政治自由主义 = Political liberalism
Citations
13 citations
13 citations
Cites background from "政治自由主义 = Political liberalism"
...(Rawls 1993, 5–6) The second principle of justice enforces and promotes impartiality and equality of opportunity, while the first principle assigns rights and duties equally (Rawls 1958, 7)....
[...]
13 citations
Cites background from "政治自由主义 = Political liberalism"
...…according to, religious traditions and organisations (in a weak or strong sense), is a fundamental human right in an open, liberal society – justifiable given the nature and reasonableness of religious beliefs and of religious upbringing (Popper, 1945; UN, 1948; Rawls, 1993; Habermas, 2006)....
[...]
...My approach rests on the premise that voluntary adherence to, and familial affiliation or upbringing according to, religious traditions and organisations (in a weak or strong sense), is a fundamental human right in an open, liberal society – justifiable given the nature and reasonableness of religious beliefs and of religious upbringing (Popper, 1945; UN, 1948; Rawls, 1993; Habermas, 2006)....
[...]
...This project was founded on the assumption that, given the ‘fact of reasonable pluralism’ (Rawls, 1993), in an open, liberal society, individuals, families and communities have the right to adhere to, practise, and believe in a religion (Popper, 1945; UN, 1948)....
[...]
...‘fact of reasonable pluralism’ in contemporary western societies (Rawls, 1993)....
[...]
...…that the secularisation thesis has only been partly realised, use terms such as ‘desecularisation’ (Berger, 1999) or ‘post-secular’ (Habermas, 2006) to describe the resurgence or continued presence of religions as a ‘fact of reasonable pluralism’ in contemporary western societies (Rawls, 1993)....
[...]
13 citations
13 citations
Cites background from "政治自由主义 = Political liberalism"
...…that, by hindering the political speech of partisans, the constraints of public reason seriously undermine the contribution that parties and partisans can provide to the change and the varieties of public reason that Rawls himself advocates as a response to social change (Rawls 2005b, p. 452)....
[...]
...Second, Rawls’s analysis suggests that public reason (e.g. during electoral campaigns) applies to all partisans, i.e. not only to elected partisans and party candidates but also to ‘other groups who support them’ (Rawls 2005a, p. 215)....
[...]
...…in public political discussion at any time, provided that in due course proper political reasons – and not reasons given solely by comprehensive doctrines – are presented that are sufficient to support whatever the comprehensive doctrines introduced are said to support’ (Rawls 2005a, p. 462)....
[...]
...In ‘The idea of public reason revisited’, Rawls (2005b) reinforces this claim and argues that ‘it is not a legal duty, for in that case it would be incompatible with freedom of speech’ (Rawls 2005a, p. 445)....
[...]
...Fundamental versus non-fundamental matters Rawls, it is well-known, argues that public reason does not apply to all political matters but solely ‘to those involving what we may call “constitutional essentials” and questions of basic justice’ (Rawls 2005a, p. 214)....
[...]
References
1,108 citations
726 citations
635 citations
595 citations
570 citations