Search or ask a question

How many neurons does a monkey brain have?

Receptive field

Cortex (anatomy)

Superior colliculus

Temporal cortex

Answers from top 6 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (6)	Insight
Journal Article•DOI Discharge characteristics of vestibular saccade neurons in alert monkeys Chris R. S. Kaneko, Kikuro Fukushima - Show less +1 more 01 Feb 1998-Journal of Neurophysiology 30 Citations	As we could not identify analogous neurons in the region of the monkey ponto-medullary junction, we conclude that horizontal on-direction VSNs do not exist in the monkey.
Book Chapter•DOI Sensory organization of the superior colliculus in cat and monkey. Mark T. Wallace, Barry E. Stein - Show less +1 more 01 Jan 1996-Progress in Brain Research 72 Citations	These findings suggest that, despite differences in the ontogeny and behavioral repertoires of cat and monkey, there is a substantial conservation in the organization and functional properties of SC neurons.
Journal Article•DOI Electrical activity of the isolated macaque brain. L.C. Massopust, Robert J. White, L.R. Wolin, Maurice S. Albin, Yashon D, N. Taslitz - Show less +5 more 01 Oct 1968-Experimental Neurology 31 Citations	It appears that the isolated primate brain shows a range of electrophysiological activity including states characteristic of the aroused brain of an intact monkey.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI A parieto-frontal network for visual numerical information in the monkey Andreas Nieder, Earl K. Miller - Show less +1 more 11 May 2004-Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 482 Citations	This finding suggests a parieto-frontal network for numerosity in monkeys and establishes homologies between the monkey and human brain.
Journal Article•DOI Single-cell recording from the brain of freely moving monkeys. Nandor Ludvig, Juan M. Botero, Hai M Tang, Baiju C. Gohil, John G. Kral - Show less +4 more 30 Apr 2001-Journal of Neuroscience Methods 23 Citations	Using this model, new insights can be obtained into the unique firing repertoire of the neurons of the primate brain.
Journal Article•DOI A comparison of somatostatin and neuropeptide Y distribution in monkey brain M. Flint Beal, Michael F. Mazurek, Joseph B. Martin - Show less +2 more 10 Mar 1987-Brain Research 47 Citations	The distribution of both neuropeptides in monkey brain closely resembles that in human brain.

My columns

Related Questions

How many brain neurons does a human have?4 answers

How many neurons are in a monkeys brain?6 answers

How many neurons are in the monkey brain?6 answers

How many neurons do the human brain have?2 answers

How many neurons does a gorilla brain have?5 answers

How many neurons exist in the brain?2 answers

See what other people are reading

How does rotating enrichment items affect habituation in captive animals?

Rotating enrichment items is a critical strategy in preventing habituation and maintaining the effectiveness of enrichment programs for captive animals. Habituation to enrichment items can lead to a decrease in the items' ability to stimulate and engage animals, potentially negating the benefits of enrichment efforts. The contexts provided offer insights into various aspects of this issue. Research on captive animals, ranging from primates to laboratory mice, has shown that introducing variety through rotation of enrichment items can significantly enhance the welfare and behavioral health of these animals. For instance, studies on chimpanzees have highlighted individual preferences for enrichment objects, suggesting that rotating items could cater to varying needs and prevent boredom. Similarly, in laboratory settings, mice showed preferences for different types of enrichment, indicating that rotation could sustain engagement and welfare benefits. In the case of captive sun bears, environmental enrichments that were rotated effectively reduced stereotypic behaviors and cortisol levels, demonstrating a decrease in stress. This suggests that rotating enrichment items can mitigate the risk of habituation and maintain the enrichment's effectiveness in reducing stress. For avian species, like red-tailed black cockatoos, foraging-based enrichments that were varied helped decrease the expression of oral repetitive behaviors, further supporting the importance of rotation in enrichment programs. Moreover, a study on New World primates showed that different olfactory enrichments elicited varied responses, indicating that rotating these items could maintain interest and activity levels without significant habituation over the study period. This is echoed in the management of Asiatic lions, where rotating feeding, sensory, and manipulable enrichment interventions led to improved welfare indices, including reduced stress levels and aberrant behaviors. Lastly, in the context of intensive pig farming, rotating enrichment items like pine and scented wood in confinement stalls was shown to alleviate chronic stress and stereotypical behaviors in sows. Collectively, these studies underscore the importance of rotating enrichment items to prevent habituation, thereby ensuring the continued effectiveness of enrichment programs in enhancing the welfare of captive animals across a variety of species.Does the presence of a goalkeeper have a significant impact on the accuracy of penalty kicks in soccer?

The presence of a goalkeeper significantly impacts the accuracy of penalty kicks in soccer. Research has shown that the interaction between kickers and goalkeepers plays a crucial role in predicting the direction of the kick, affecting the zone or sector of the goal aimed at. Studies utilizing functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) have revealed that players experience different brain activations based on the presence and type of goalkeeper, with anxiety levels affecting performance. Moreover, experiments focusing on shooting performance have demonstrated that providing specific attentional and motivational instructions, especially in combination with an external focus and autonomy support, can enhance the number of goals scored and kicking accuracy when facing a goalkeeper.What are the current techniques used in in vivo electrophysiology to study the hippocampus?

Current techniques in in vivo electrophysiology for hippocampal studies include the use of penetrating polymer probe arrays, glass pipettes with integrated microelectrodes for multimodal data acquisition, and implantable microelectrode arrays (MEA) for dual-mode detection of neurotransmitter release and electrophysiological signals. These techniques enable researchers to record neural activity, including spikes and field potentials, from deep brain structures like the hippocampus. The integration of multiple physiological modalities in microdevices allows for comprehensive data collection, validation of spike-sorting algorithms, and advancements in brain-machine interfaces. Additionally, MEAs with selective electrochemical detection of neurotransmitters provide real-time monitoring of glutamate levels in the hippocampus, crucial for understanding neurological and mental disorders.How fast synaptogenesis occur?

Synaptogenesis occurs at varying speeds depending on the brain region and developmental stage. In the macaque monkey neocortex, the most rapid phase of synaptogenesis lasts around 40 days, centered on birth, with phase 3 being particularly modifiable by stimulation or deprivation. In the hippocampus, synaptogenesis in CA1 occurs within 30 minutes after long-term potentiation induction, with subsequent changes in presynaptic vesicles and axonal boutons observed at 2 hours. Human fetal cortical synaptogenesis initiates between the 6th and 7th gestational week, with a rapid increase in synaptic density by 12-14 weeks. The adult dentate gyrus displays asynchrony in synapse formation, with GABAergic inputs developing early but slowly, while glutamatergic inputs have a late onset and rapid maturation. These findings collectively highlight the dynamic and region-specific nature of synaptogenesis timelines.What is the difference between fovea centralis and peripheral retina?

The fovea centralis and peripheral retina exhibit distinct characteristics. The fovea, with its high-acuity central vision, contains cone photoreceptors densely packed in a unique array, leading to slower cone signals compared to the peripheral retina. In contrast, the peripheral retina shows asymmetries in visual discrimination, with better sensitivity along the horizontal meridian and lower visual field. Moreover, the foveal optic radiations demonstrate higher fractional anisotropy and mean kurtosis, indicating denser nerve fiber populations compared to the peripheral optic radiations. Additionally, hue-scaling data reveals that peripheral stimuli appear more saturated than foveal stimuli, especially in the green-yellow region, suggesting shifts in unique hue loci with retinal location. These differences highlight the specialized functions and adaptations of the fovea centralis and peripheral retina in visual processing.How does the brain differentiate aromas?

The brain distinguishes aromas through a complex interplay of neural processes involving various brain regions. Studies have shown that odorants evoke correlated activity in the olfactory epithelium and olfactory bulb, but the encoding of chemical attributes in the cortex is crucial for discrimination and generalization. Mitral cells in the olfactory bulb reliably transmit information about the ortho versus retronasal modality of odors to downstream brain regions, affecting how odors are processed and perceived. Human olfactory cortex exhibits characteristic oscillatory responses to odors, with distinct theta, beta, and gamma frequency bands playing roles in odor identification. Frontal theta rhythm reflects neural processing of odors, suggesting its potential incorporation in olfactory-based Brain-Computer Interfaces for conditions like anosmia. Additionally, emotional olfactory stimuli influence EEG effective connectivity among the piriform, orbitofrontal, and entorhinal cortices, with gender differences affecting odor discrimination abilities.What is the role of the reticular ascending system in processing negative thoughts?

The ascending reticular activating system (ARAS) plays a crucial role in processing negative thoughts by regulating consciousness. It comprises the reticular formation, thalamus, and thalamo-cortical system, governing wakefulness, vigilance, and essential functions of consciousness. Additionally, the ARAS is involved in generating aversive emotional states and alarming vocalizations through the activation of the mesolimbic cholinergic system, which induces aversive arousal. The discovery of the ARAS marked a significant shift in understanding the neural basis of awareness, moving away from earlier beliefs attributing consciousness to various anatomical structures. Understanding the thalamocortical projections within the ARAS is crucial for clinicians managing patients with impaired consciousness. Therefore, the ARAS is intricately involved in both positive and negative emotional processing and consciousness regulation.Do monkeys recognize credit ?

Monkeys demonstrate various cognitive abilities related to recognition. They possess a highly developed capacity for face recognition, similar to humans, as shown in studies with capuchin monkeys. Additionally, research on rhesus macaques indicates that neuronal activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex reflects information necessary for credit assignment, linking causes and effects during learning tasks. While monkeys may not recognize credit in the same complex way as humans, they exhibit the ability to recognize token validity and engage in exchanges, resembling some features of human monetary systems. Therefore, monkeys showcase recognition abilities in different contexts, from identifying familiar individuals in pictures to understanding the outcomes of their choices in tasks, indicating a level of cognitive recognition akin to credit assignment.What is the impact of exercise intensity on cortical activity?

Different exercise intensities have varying impacts on cortical activity. Moderate to high-intensity exercises have been shown to increase prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation during cognitive tasks, indicating improved neural processing. Specifically, high-intensity aerobic exercise has been linked to increased cortical activation in the frontal lobe, without affecting temporal lobe activity. Additionally, high-intensity interval training has demonstrated increased corticospinal excitability and reduced inhibition, potentially enhancing motor learning through cortical neuroplasticity. Furthermore, high-intensity exercise training programs have shown to enhance PFC functioning, cognitive performance, cardiac autonomic control, and psychosocial aspects in individuals with a history of drug abuse. Overall, exercise intensity plays a crucial role in modulating cortical activity, with higher intensities often leading to more pronounced effects on neural processing.What specific brain areas induce rhythmic activity in v1?

Rhythmic activity in the primary visual cortex (V1) is induced by feedback projections from higher visual areas, such as mid- to high-level cortical association areas. This feedback plays a crucial role in modulating neural oscillations, including gamma rhythms (30-80 Hz), which are synchronized with action potentials of nearby neurons in V1. The interaction between V1 and higher visual areas is essential for generating and maintaining these rhythmic activities, as demonstrated by the significant decrease in gamma rhythms and visually evoked potentials in V1 when feedback projections are inactivated. Therefore, while V1 itself is involved in processing visual information, the rhythmic activities within V1 are strongly influenced by feedback from other brain regions, highlighting the complex network dynamics involved in visual perception and processing.Is there some paper that has used the 5CSRTT in monkey?

Yes, a study by Gancz et al. utilized the 5-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT) in rodents to study visuospatial attention and impulsiveness. Additionally, Cope and Young discussed the development of the rodent five-choice continuous performance task (5C-CPT) as a tool for assessing attention and response inhibition in animals, which can be directly translated to clinical continuous performance tests (CPTs) used in humans. Although the 5CSRTT was specifically mentioned in the context of rodents, the principles and methodologies of this task can be adapted for use in other animals like monkeys.