How to remediate TLS robot vulnerability?
Answers from top 14 papers
More filters
Papers (14) | Insight |
---|---|
Thus, we believe that the current TLS system is not fit for purpose and must be revisited as a whole. | |
01 Aug 2017 24 Citations | Unauthorized access to a robot, or a multi-robot network, may seriously compromise the system, potentially leading to unacceptable consequences, such as putting in danger humans that share the environment with the robot(s). |
06 Dec 2017 | The results affirm the addition of new security benefits to the existing TLS-based authentication mechanisms. |
Thus, with this tool we can make an automatic verification of TLS. | |
01 Jan 2018 42 Citations | In this work, we present TLS-N, the first TLS extension that provides secure non-repudiation and solves both of the mentioned challenges. |
01 Jan 2016 | Several of these tools also mislead browsers into believing that a TLS connection is more secure than it actually is, by e. g., artificially upgrading a server’s TLS version at the client. |
Our analysis reveals the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, demonstrating that the path to improving TLS security in the mobile platform is not straightforward. | |
13 Mar 2018 | Our result revealed that 5 (33.3%) of the applications examined are vulnerable to man-in-the-middle (MITM) and/or TLS renegotiation attacks. |
20 Jun 2005 | Overall, our mechanisms unlock the potential of TLS for the toughest applications. |
It turns out that the effect on the security of TLS-ECDH is devastating. | |
01 May 2017 | Taken together, our results demonstrate that complete TLS/SSL revocation checking is within reach for all clients. |
30 Aug 2015 | We believe that mucert is practical and effective for helping improve the robustness of SSL/TLS implementations. |
Our results confirm the soundness of TLS 1.3 security protection design. | |
We show generically that the proposed fixes (RFC 7627) for TLS 1.2 offer good protection against multiple handshakes attacks. |
Related Questions
What are the current security threats and vulnerabilities in the Internet of Things (IoT) devices?5 answersCurrent security threats and vulnerabilities in IoT devices include a wide range of issues such as outdated components, exposed sensitive information like NAT-PMP details, remote access through telnet, Heartbleed and Ticketbleed vulnerabilities, expired SSL certificates, insecure default settings, default SNMP agent community names, non-standard ports usage, and generic or default passwords on Cisco devices. Additionally, IoT devices are susceptible to being compromised for launching DDoS attacks, providing entry points to private networks, and facing evolving threat vectors like brute force attacks and remote code execution exploits. The interconnection between IoT devices also creates an interdependence that can lead to uncontrollable cascades of effects during systematic risk events, emphasizing the importance of considering such factors in risk evaluations. These vulnerabilities highlight the critical need for robust security measures in IoT systems.
What are the most recent papers on the topic of vulnerability?5 answersThe most recent papers on the topic of vulnerability include a paper by Alyson Cole, which raises concerns about the use of vulnerability as a language to conceptualize injustice and its attendant injuries. Another paper by James D. Ford et al. evaluates concerns over the use of vulnerability approaches in the climate change field and suggests revitalizing vulnerability research. Kenneth McLaughlin discusses the proliferation of the concept of vulnerability in various domains, including psychology, social work, politics, and law, and highlights both progressive and problematic aspects of its use. Kate Brown and Helen Stinson provide an overview of the literature on vulnerability, including critiques of its application in policy and practice, as well as theoretical perspectives that deepen understanding of vulnerability. Radhika Gorur notes the widespread use of the term "vulnerable" in various academic disciplines and policy fields.
What are the different defensive techniques that can be used to mitigate data poisoning and backdoor attacks?4 answersStrong data augmentations such as mixup and CutMix can be used as defensive techniques to mitigate data poisoning and backdoor attacks without sacrificing performance. Another defensive technique is the use of robust covariance estimation to amplify the spectral signature of corrupted data, which can completely remove the backdoor even in scenarios where previous methods fail. Rotation-based image transformation can also be used to insert highly effective backdoors, and existing data augmentation techniques and backdoor defenses are not consistently effective against this attack. Leveraging timestamps and defining temporal robustness metrics can provide protection against data poisoning attacks, and temporal aggregation is a baseline defense that offers provable temporal robustness. Finally, a new approach based on extracting information from the training data can reliably identify poisoned instances in Denial-of-Service (DoS) data poisoning attacks.
What are the security threats and vulnerabilities of the AI?5 answersAI systems face security threats and vulnerabilities. Adversaries can query AI systems to learn internal decision logic, knowledge bases, or training data, leading to surveillance vulnerabilities. The identification of vulnerabilities, threats, and risks of AI technologies requires consideration of each technology separately or in aggregate when used together. In the context of medical and public health, the use of AI support in decision-making processes amplifies the security and privacy risks of individual medical and life data. Connectionist AI applications, particularly in computer vision, are vulnerable to threats to integrity, such as adversarial attacks and poisoning attacks. To ensure IT security for AI applications, multiple protective measures on different levels, including the AI system itself, the AI life cycle, and the larger IT infrastructure, need to be combined.
Is one that does not pose a danger as there is no vulnerability to exploit?3 answersThere is a paper that discusses the vulnerability and danger of contamination in a specific area, but it does not mention any areas that do not pose a danger or have no vulnerability to exploit. Another paper focuses on assessing threats to networks using attack graphs, but it does not mention any scenarios where there is no vulnerability to exploit. A third paper analyzes vulnerabilities in the Android Framework and its potential for exploitation, but it does not mention any instances where there is no vulnerability to exploit. A fourth paper explores the interaction of microwave radiation and human beings, but it does not mention any situations where there is no vulnerability to exploit. Lastly, a fifth paper discusses the weaknesses of open source software and the need for secure code checking systems, but it does not mention any cases where there is no vulnerability to exploit.
How can network vulnerabilities be mitigated?5 answersLes vulnérabilités du réseau peuvent être atténuées au moyen de diverses stratégies. L'une des approches consiste à effectuer des tests de pénétration afin de cerner les vulnérabilités du système et de les corriger en conséquence]. Une autre stratégie consiste à déployer des mesures de sécurité avancées et persistantes, comme l'analytique informatique, les mécanismes de sécurité du réseau et les mesures de sécurité des extrémités. De plus, l'application des contraintes de sécurité au réseau peut aider à prévenir l'accès non autorisé aux biens en divisant le réseau en sous-réseaux restrictifs et en exigeant des justificatifs de sécurité pour l'accès. De plus, l'analyse des données de sécurité du réseau provenant de diverses sources et l'application de modèles d'apprentissage automatique peuvent aider à prévoir et à corriger les vulnérabilités du réseau. En mettant en œuvre ces stratégies d'atténuation, les organisations peuvent améliorer la sécurité de leurs réseaux et se protéger contre les attaques potentielles.