In which year does the National Strategic Plan for Tuberculosis expects to eliminate TB from India?
Answers from top 2 papers
More filters
| Papers (2) | Insight |
|---|---|
| The results of such studies will be vital for the accurate monitoring of tuberculosis control efforts in India and globally. | |
25 Citations | Our findings also highlight the need to assess the pulmonary TB burden in India. |
My columns
Related Questions
How many people die due to tuberculosis in India?12 answers
In which year National Tuberculosis Programme NTP for TB control in India was initiated?5 answers
When was the National Tuberculosis Control Programme launched?4 answers
Which agency has been supporting the National Tuberculosis Control Program of India?4 answers
Which year Rntcp Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program renamed as National TB Elimination Programme?1 answers
Which year is set as a target year by the government of India to end tuberculosis?4 answers
See what other people are reading
How common is the use of fixed prosthetic restorations in recent years?
5 answers
The use of fixed prosthetic restorations has become increasingly common in recent years, with advancements in materials and technologies driving this trend. Studies have shown that dental ceramics, particularly when used in indirect fixed prosthetic restorations, are considered state-of-the-art for achieving high-quality outcomes. Additionally, the adoption of digital technology, such as CAD/CAM systems, has revolutionized the field of dentistry, making the fabrication of dental prostheses more efficient and precise. Furthermore, research has highlighted the importance of assessing outcome measures and methods in clinical studies on fixed single- and multiple-unit implant restorations, emphasizing the need for standardized assessment protocols. Overall, these findings underscore the increasing prevalence and importance of fixed prosthetic restorations in modern dental practice.Why does undernutrition among adolescents occur?5 answers
Undernutrition among adolescents occurs due to various factors such as inappropriate eating behaviors, socioeconomic status, hygiene practices, and early maternal age. Adolescents often consume poor-quality diets with insufficient nutrients, influenced by individual, social, and environmental determinants of behavior and health. Factors like low dietary diversity, poor hygiene behavior compliance, and poverty contribute to undernutrition, particularly stunting and thinness, in adolescents. Adolescent pregnancy is associated with increased risk of childhood underweight and wasting, highlighting the intergenerational impact of malnutrition. Additionally, studies show that factors like pre-mensuration status, household food insecurity, and specific food choices are significantly associated with thinness among female adolescents. Addressing these multifaceted issues through improved nutrition, hygiene practices, and targeted interventions is crucial to combat undernutrition among adolescents and break the cycle of malnutrition.How does the incidence of type 1 diabetes in children vary across different regions and populations?4 answers
The incidence of type 1 diabetes in children varies significantly across regions and populations. Globally, the reported incidence rates range from 0.1 in China and Venezuela to as high as 36.8 in Sardinia and 36.5 in Finland, with a more than 350-fold difference. Higher rates are generally observed in higher-income countries, such as Sweden, Norway, Canada, the United Kingdom, and New Zealand. The prevalence of pancreatic islet autoantibodies (iAb) in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes also varies across different regions, with IA-2A being the most prevalent globally in new-onset cases, showing substantial variation across world regions. Understanding these variations is crucial for early identification, clinical management, and resource allocation to address the increasing global health challenge of childhood diabetes.What is the evidence about kinesiotape in the postpartum period?5 answers
Kinesio taping (KT) shows promising results in the postpartum period. Studies indicate that KT effectively improves rectus abdominal diastasis (RAD) above the umbilicus, reducing interrecti distance (IRD) significantly. Additionally, KT aids in alleviating postpartum low back pain (PLBP) and enhancing functional abilities in women after cesarean section. Diastasis recti, common postpartum, is effectively managed by KT, enhancing lumbo-pelvic stability. While KT may not significantly improve physical qualities or motor control in athletes, it shows short-term benefits in reducing pain and improving posture. Overall, the evidence supports the use of KT as an adjunct therapy for postpartum issues, particularly RAD, PLBP, and diastasis recti.What is gamma in camera?4 answers
A gamma camera is a crucial tool in nuclear medicine that utilizes gamma or x-ray radiation to create diagnostic images of metabolically active areas, organ function, blood flow in the heart muscle, bone growth, tumor detection, and various medical studies. It consists of a detector array with pixels generating signals from incident radiation, collimators to focus radiation onto detector pixels, an actuator for precise movement, and a processor for image data generation with sub-pixel resolution. In autoimmune diseases, nuclear medicine techniques play a significant role in evaluating disease activity, offering sensitive modalities for diagnosis and therapy decision-making, using specific radiopharmaceuticals to understand immune processes and aid in therapy selection. Advanced gamma cameras based on dual-detector technology integrate visible light and radiation images for accurate registration and fusion, enabling high-resolution energy spectrum analysis and nuclide identification.What cost-benefit analyses have been done evaluating the COVID-19 pandemic?10 answers
Cost-benefit analyses evaluating the COVID-19 pandemic have covered a wide range of interventions, from healthcare services to public health measures and economic policies. Sara Waring's study highlights the economic value of partnership work between fire and rescue services and the NHS during the pandemic, demonstrating that benefits outweighed costs for all activities, with total benefits ranging between £171.46 million and £1.10 billion against costs of £93.26 million. Kathryn Antioch discusses the broader scope of health economics literature during the pandemic, emphasizing the importance of evaluating government policies, health system innovations, and care models through various economic methodologies, including cost-utility analysis (CUA) and cost-benefit analysis (CBA).
Mesa Sukmadani Rusdi and colleagues evaluated the cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 treatments for hospitalized patients, finding that certain treatment combinations were dominant in terms of cost-effectiveness, saving significant amounts per recovered patient. Li-Hua Zhou et al. conducted a meta-analysis on the economic and health benefits of COVID-19 interventions, finding that non-pharmacological interventions, vaccinations, and treatments were all cost-effective, with pooled incremental net benefits indicating substantial economic value. Reyhane Izadi and team systematically reviewed economic evaluations of preventive, control, and treatment strategies against COVID-19, concluding that vaccination was the most cost-effective strategy.
Maja Kjær Rasmussen et al. suggested that economic evaluations of pandemic interventions should adopt a broader perspective, including productivity costs, to fully capture their economic impact. Jaideep J. Pandit discussed the economic justification of intensive care for COVID-19 patients, indicating a favorable cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Constandine Vardavas and colleagues assessed the direct and indirect costs of the pandemic and the cost-effectiveness of various public health measures, finding substantial economic burdens but also cost-effective interventions. Brandon Wen Bing Chua et al. aimed to identify the most cost-effective combination of COVID-19 response policies, emphasizing the importance of considering both direct and indirect costs in their analysis. Finally, David Cook and colleagues compared the benefits of a suppression policy to a herd immunity approach in Western Australia, finding the suppression policy to be slightly more beneficial in terms of preventing hospitalizations and deaths.
These studies collectively underscore the complexity and necessity of conducting cost-benefit analyses across different sectors and interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic, providing valuable insights for policymakers and healthcare providers.What cost-benefit analyses have been done evaluating the COVID-19 pandemic response policies?10 answers
Cost-benefit analyses (CBA) evaluating COVID-19 pandemic response policies have been diverse, focusing on various aspects of public health and economic impacts. Kathryn Antioch's study highlights the use of CBA and cost utility analysis (CUA) to evaluate government policies aimed at suppressing or mitigating COVID-19 transmission, emphasizing the importance of considering mortality, morbidity, quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains, and national income loss. Yi Wu's research applies the Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the impact of public health policies, balancing the value of lives saved against economic output decline, thereby addressing the dilemma of preserving lives versus economic concerns.
Jing Lou and colleagues' case study on Singapore examines the economic and health system impacts of varying quarantine lengths and testing strategies, using incremental net monetary benefit (INB) to quantify the trade-offs between health benefits and economic costs. Li-Hua Zhou et al. conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the health economic evaluation evidence globally, finding that non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs), vaccinations, and treatments are cost-effective in combating the pandemic.
Maja Kjær Rasmussen's review suggests that economic evaluations of pandemic interventions should adopt a broader perspective, including productivity costs, to fully understand their economic impact. Reyhane Izadi's systematic review indicates that all strategies, especially vaccination, are likely to be cost-effective against COVID-19 compared to no intervention. Ajaree Rayanakorn's systematic review emphasizes the cost-effectiveness of a combination approach in public health interventions (PHIs) over single interventions.
Brandon Wen Bing Chua's study proposes using a cost-utility analysis to identify the most cost-effective combination of COVID-19 response policies, considering both direct healthcare costs and indirect societal costs. The critique by Context_9 argues against the appropriateness of CBA for COVID policy-making due to its inability to capture incommensurable values and its problematic distributional implications. Lastly, Giorgio Mannarini's research introduces a deep learning approach to simulate pandemic scenarios, offering a data-driven method to evaluate the efficacy and economic damage of mitigation policies. Together, these studies provide a comprehensive overview of the cost-benefit analyses conducted to evaluate COVID-19 pandemic response policies, highlighting the complexity and multifaceted nature of such evaluations.What is the correlation between certain neurological disorders and urinary tract infections?5 answers
Neurological disorders, such as Parkinson's disease (PD) and neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (nLUTD), are closely linked to urinary tract infections (UTIs) due to factors like altered urodynamics, catheterization, and neurogenic bladder dysfunction. These conditions often lead to increased UTI risk, which can result in severe consequences like sepsis and morbidity in affected individuals. In neuro-patients, UTIs are considered complicated, requiring specialized management and potentially different microbiology compared to the general population. Recurrent UTIs in these patients may necessitate investigation for underlying urological causes. Strategies to prevent UTIs in neurological patients include various interventions like topical estrogen, prophylactic supplements, and antibiotic bladder irrigation, with ongoing research exploring new approaches like bacterial interference and immunostimulants.What is walkability Guidelines?5 answers
Walkability guidelines encompass various factors essential for creating pedestrian-friendly environments in urban areas. These guidelines emphasize the importance of well-planned pedestrian paths in terms of width, paving, landscaping, signing, and lighting to ensure safety, security, and comfort for city dwellers. Additionally, features such as liveliness, high-quality façades, and low buildings have been identified as key elements that can enhance walkability and promote walking activities in urban spaces. Modifying the built environment to be more conducive to walking has been linked to better health outcomes, including reduced risks of developing diabetes, lower BMI, and decreased incidence of hypertension, highlighting the significance of walkable neighborhoods in promoting physical activity and overall well-being.What is the effect of hyaluronic acid on reducing the adverse effects of inhaled saline in cystic fibrosis?5 answers
In cystic fibrosis (CF), hyaluronic acid (HA) has been shown to play a beneficial role in reducing the adverse effects of inhaled saline treatments. Studies suggest that inhaled HA can improve the tolerability of nebulized hypertonic saline (HS) in CF patients, even at higher concentrations of 6% or 7%. Additionally, combining HS with HA has been found to enhance the antioxidant and membrane-stabilizing effects of the treatment, leading to a decrease in lipid peroxidation byproducts and improved activity balance in the system of antiradical protection. These findings indicate that the use of HA in conjunction with inhaled saline therapies may offer a promising approach to mitigate adverse effects and enhance the therapeutic outcomes in CF patients.What are prevalance of low back pain?5 answers
The prevalence of low back pain (LBP) is a significant health concern globally, affecting various populations. Studies indicate that approximately 80% of individuals experience low back pain at least once in their lifetime, with a higher prevalence observed among working-age individuals, athletes, and emergency medical services personnel. Factors contributing to the prevalence of LBP include improper spine preparation, weak muscles, sedentary lifestyles, mental exhaustion, uncomfortable sleeping conditions, and gender differences. Research among students, athletes, and emergency medical services personnel revealed varying prevalence rates, with percentages ranging from 35.09% to 50.30%. Understanding the epidemiology of LBP is crucial for implementing preventive strategies and evidence-based interventions to alleviate the burden of this condition on individuals and society.