scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Answers from top 5 papers

More filters
Papers (5)Insight
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Balbir Barn, Souvik Barat, Tony Clark 
05 Feb 2017
16 Citations
Empirical approaches that include various systematic review (SR) methodologies such as systematic literature review (SLR) and systematic mapping study (SMS) are found to be effective in this context.
Originality/value This paper demonstrates the usefulness of the systematic literature review methodology in developing an integrated framework for analysis.
As far as we know, it is the first attempt of including a complex topic like systematic review in a university course on empirical software engineering.
It might help in choosing a method that best fits the concept to analyze, thus enhancing quality of concept analysis research.
We conclude that thoughtful use of the systematic review methodology may be of benefit to the sector.

Related Questions

What is the systematic review?5 answersA systematic review is a method used to search, select, appraise, and summarize all relevant studies that fit pre-specified criteria to answer a research question. It plays a crucial role in evidence-based research by evaluating and synthesizing existing literature, identifying patterns across multiple studies, and addressing complex questions. Systematic reviews are transparent, reproducible, and credible, and they contribute to the current understanding of complex issues, inform clinical practice and policy, and impact medical practices and policies. In healthcare, systematic reviews are used to address therapeutic research questions and assess the level of evidence for specific interventions. In other fields such as land planning and environmental management, systematic reviews are used to study the methods used in prospective studies and scenario-based approaches, and to assess soil ecosystem services and related threats. Additionally, systematic reviews are used to measure and assess abortion stigma, and to develop tools and methods for valid and reliable measurement.
What is a systematic review?4 answersA systematic review is a rigorous method of synthesizing all available research on a specific topic. It involves conducting a comprehensive search for relevant literature, evaluating the quality of included studies, and summarizing the findings in a systematic and reproducible manner. Systematic reviews are considered the highest level of evidence in the hierarchy of evidence pyramid. They are used to establish the state of existing knowledge, guide clinical practice, and inform guideline development. Unlike narrative reviews, systematic reviews have clearly stated objectives, predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria, and an explicit methodology. They involve exhaustive searches to identify all sources of evidence and assess the validity of each included study. However, systematic reviews have limitations, such as the quality of included evidence and the presence of biases. Overall, systematic reviews are a valuable tool for evidence-based practice and decision-making in various fields, including nursing and medicine.
What is a systematic review?5 answersA systematic review is a rigorous and meticulous summary of all available primary research on a specific topic. It is considered the most reliable source of evidence for guiding clinical practice. Systematic reviews aim to consolidate existing knowledge, identify unresolved problems, and provide a deeper insight into a specific phenomenon. They are conducted following a predefined search strategy to minimize bias and appraise all available published literature. Systematic reviews provide an objective answer to a defined question and contribute to evidence-based decision-making. By adhering to a prospectively defined protocol, systematic reviews reduce bias and provide a comprehensive overview of the evidence. They are increasingly common in published research and are important for infection control professionals and hospital epidemiologists in determining changes in clinical practice.
What are the steps involved in conducting a descriptive analysis in a systematic review paper?5 answersThe steps involved in conducting a descriptive analysis in a systematic review paper include: formulating the research question and developing a research protocol, designing and executing a search strategy to find relevant studies, screening the evidence for relevant studies, extracting relevant data from the selected studies, critically appraising each study for potential biases, assessing and analyzing the evidence, and formulating a report to document the findings. These steps ensure that the systematic review is conducted in a rigorous and comprehensive manner, allowing for the synthesis of the best available evidence on the topic of interest.
Are systematic reviews considered research articles?7 answers
Is systematic review clinical research?4 answers

See what other people are reading

What are elements of good acting in film?
5 answers
Good acting in film involves a combination of elements that contribute to the authenticity and effectiveness of performances. Elements such as emotional truthfulness through self-expression, technique, imitation, and the use of affective memory are crucial in creating compelling on-screen portrayals. Performance details like physical and vocal expressions, as well as implicit dramatic actions, play a significant role in conveying tangible impressions about characters and stories in independent films. Understanding the essence of montage as the selection and combination of all cinematic elements, including actors' movements, gestures, and expressions, is vital in creating meaningful performances that interact with other cinematic choices. By incorporating these various elements, actors can deliver believable and emotionally resonant performances that enhance the overall impact of the film.
What are some best practices for designing and implementing effective research on maternal healthcare service delivery models?
5 answers
Effective research on maternal healthcare service delivery models can benefit from various best practices identified in the literature. These include utilizing a mixed-method approach to gather both quantitative and qualitative data for a comprehensive analysis, engaging in human-centered design to develop interventions that promote supportive and dignified maternity care, defining implementation research priorities through methods like the Delphi technique to address quality gaps and care variations, adopting international recommendations and conducting codesign workshops with stakeholders to tailor models of care to specific contexts, and conducting systematic searches and screenings of qualitative and quantitative research to understand effective strategies for integrating new models of care into existing maternity services. These practices can enhance the design and implementation of research on maternal healthcare service delivery models.
What is the significance of international collaboration among multinationals?
5 answers
International collaboration among multinationals is crucial for innovation and knowledge production. Research indicates that multinational research teams have evolved over time, showing increased collaboration with nations of varying scientific and economic standings. Studies emphasize the importance of cross-country collaboration in generating impactful ideas and patents, benefiting inventors in the long term. However, it is noted that improved individual inventor performance through international exposure may not always translate to enhanced subsidiary-level innovation capabilities. The effectiveness of policies promoting multinational research is highlighted, emphasizing the need to focus on qualitative aspects of collaborations for successful outcomes. Overall, international collaboration enhances knowledge sharing, innovation, and market performance for multinationals, making it a significant driver of global success.
What are the benefits of ginger for smoothing throat?
5 answers
Ginger has shown potential benefits for throat health due to its effects on airway smooth muscle (ASM) relaxation and inflammation modulation. Studies have demonstrated that ginger and its active components, such as [6]-gingerol, [8]-gingerol, and [6]-shogaol, induce bronchodilation by modulating intracellular calcium levels in ASM. Furthermore, these ginger constituents have been found to potentiate the effects of β-agonists in relaxing ASM, involving inhibition of phosphodiesterase 4D and cytoskeletal regulatory proteins. Additionally, ginger constituents have been shown to alleviate oxidative stress and inflammation, which could contribute to soothing the throat. Overall, the relaxation of airway smooth muscle and anti-inflammatory properties of ginger suggest potential benefits for throat comfort and health.
WHAT ARE THE FACTORS on why students like english writing?
4 answers
Students' liking towards English writing can be attributed to various factors identified in the research papers. Factors influencing students' motivation in English writing include institutional demands, linguistic needs, enthusiastic teachers, engaging activities, interesting topics, and a positive learning atmosphere. Additionally, attitudes towards writing in English are influenced by factors such as interest, motivation, writing anxiety, literacy skills, and the impact of the native language. Moreover, motivational factors affecting students in writing essays encompass teacher's performance, peers' performance, parent's involvement, and classroom ambience. Furthermore, students' motivation to write is influenced by their habitus, identity, social supports, perception of autonomy, and the exploration of complex emotions encountered in the social world. Motivation, along with vocabulary mastery, significantly impacts students' English narrative writing skills.
What are spatial-temporal distribution of mobile pastoralists in Ethiopia?
5 answers
The spatial-temporal distribution of mobile pastoralists in Ethiopia is influenced by factors such as seasonal climatic conditions, the spread of mechanized farming, and insecurity events, leading to diverse types of mobility patterns. Pastoralist communities in Ethiopia, particularly mobile pastoralists, face challenges in accessing healthcare services due to their high degree of mobility, remote terrain, and cultural barriers. Studies highlight that TB control activities in pastoralist regions of Ethiopia are significantly fewer compared to other areas, indicating a lack of alignment with the pastoralist lifestyle. To prevent desertification in extensively grazed rangelands, explicit management of the spatial distribution of animals is crucial, as the distribution of grazing pressure significantly impacts desertification. Implementing geospatial sampling methods can provide cost-affordable strategies for sampling mobile populations like pastoralists, aiding in reaching these underserved groups with essential health services.
What Are best Coaching Styles among the following?• Positive Psychology Coaching• Narrative Coaching• Existential Coaching• Solution-Focused Coaching?
4 answers
Positive Psychology Coaching and Narrative Coaching are two prominent coaching styles discussed in the provided contexts. Positive Psychology Coaching focuses on developing positive leadership outcomes by incorporating evidence-based coaching and positive psychology techniques. On the other hand, Narrative Coaching emphasizes the use of narrative techniques like externalizing conversation, re-authoring, and remembering to facilitate positive change and transformation in coachees. Both coaching styles offer unique approaches to fostering personal and professional growth. While Positive Psychology Coaching centers on enhancing well-being and performance through a focus on positive emotions and relationships, Narrative Coaching delves into storytelling and reframing techniques to empower individuals to rewrite their narratives for positive outcomes. These coaching styles provide valuable tools for coaches to support individuals in achieving their goals and personal development.
Are fandoms productive?
5 answers
Fandoms exhibit productivity through various fan activities like fan talk, fanvideos, and fan-created videos. Fans engage in rewriting media texts, creating memes, and producing new narratives based on their favorite franchises, showcasing their creative and critical abilities. These activities not only deepen fan engagement but also contribute to the promotion of cultural commodities beyond the fan community, highlighting the fans' role as productive consumers. The internet and digital media have significantly enhanced fan participation and expression, allowing for the rapid sharing of meanings and signifiers related to fandoms, fostering a sense of community and enabling the construction of new cultural meanings. Overall, fandoms demonstrate productivity through their creative reinterpretation and dissemination of media content.
How does performance analysis contribute to the success of professional athletes?
5 answers
Performance analysis plays a crucial role in enhancing the success of professional athletes by providing valuable insights and support to coaches and players. Through the collection, filtering, and delivery of information, performance analysts assist in optimizing training practices, match preparation, and game strategies. By utilizing advanced technologies and analyzing various contextual factors, performance analysis helps coaches understand athlete behaviors, design effective practice tasks, and make informed decisions. Additionally, the close relationship between coaches and analysts is essential for effective communication and the delivery of complex information in meaningful ways. This collaborative approach enables the identification of areas for improvement, leading to enhanced performance outcomes and competitive advantages for professional athletes.
Why bother replicating a study and field that has had consistent insignificant findings?
4 answers
Replicating studies with consistent insignificant findings is crucial despite the lack of statistical significance. Non-significant results do not necessarily indicate the absence of an effect and can provide valuable insights into the validity of theories. Replication helps in assessing the robustness and generalizability of findings, ensuring the reliability of scientific knowledge. The Reproducibility Project highlighted the importance of replication by revealing discrepancies between original and repeated studies, emphasizing the need for rigorous replication to validate research outcomes. Utilizing methods like equivalence testing and Bayes factors can aid in quantifying evidence for the absence of an effect, enhancing the interpretability of non-significant results. Therefore, replicating studies, even with consistent non-significant findings, is essential for advancing scientific understanding and maintaining the integrity of research.
Is there evidence that cannabis use is linked to pyschosis?
4 answers
There is substantial evidence linking cannabis use to psychosis. Studies conducted in both Global North and Global South regions have consistently shown associations between cannabis use and the occurrence and age of onset of psychoses, emphasizing the need for preventive strategies. Additionally, systematic reviews and meta-analyses have highlighted the relationship between cannabis use and adverse mental health outcomes, such as the development of psychosis, especially in young individuals. Furthermore, research indicates that cannabis use may lead to an increased risk of pseudarthrosis, surgical complications, and medical complications in patients undergoing lumbar fusion procedures, emphasizing the broader health implications of cannabis consumption. Overall, the data strongly supports the notion that cannabis use is indeed linked to psychosis and other adverse health outcomes.