Is blood doping permanent?
Answers from top 6 papers
More filters
Papers (6) | Insight |
---|---|
12 Citations | The conclusion is that blood doping, properly performed, works in the laboratory, but there is insufficient evidence to show conclusively that it works in the field. |
112 Citations | Changes in blood volume and 2,3-diphosphoglycerate following blood doping are transient and, other than during the first 24 h post infusion, appear to be inconsequential. |
18 Citations | The implementation of indirect markers of blood doping stored in an Athlete's Biological Passport provides a powerful means to deter any form of blood transfusion. |
18 Citations | From this preliminary in vitro investigation it emerges that Prdx2 and RBC populations might be further tested as candidate biomarkers of blood doping through autologous transfusion, though it is yet to be assessed whether the kinetics in vivo of Prdx2 exposure in the membrane of transfused RBCs will endow a sufficient time-window to allow reliable anti-doping testing. |
42 Citations | Since the donor and recipient blood are identical in autologous blood doping, this is less risky, though much more challenging to detect. |
69 Citations | Secondly, the same model can be applied to evaluate the evidence of blood doping from a full sequence of individual test results, and not just from a single test result as a function of previous results. |
Related Questions
Do you feel that blood doping should be legalized?5 answers
Should blood doping be banned?5 answers
What are the short and long term health risks associated with blood doping?4 answers
What is the principle behind blood doping?4 answers
Where is blood doping illegal?6 answers
Which athletes use blood doping?6 answers