Is globalization good for the United States Why or why not?
Answers from top 14 papers
More filters
| Papers (14) | Insight |
|---|---|
| To understand why developing countries do not automatically benefit from financial globalization, both the need for a minimum institutional quality (the threshold hypothesis) and the possibility of varying volatility of different types of capital flows (the composition hypothesis) have been suggested. | |
| （3） The United States should be deeply criticized for going against globalization, returning to trade and investment protectionism, and moving toward unilateralism in recent years. | |
| This article shows why this might result from globalization favoring concentration. | |
15 Citations | Globalization does not undermine the legitimacy of IGOs in democratically well-attuned rich states. |
| To address the topic of this session, I feel that instead of looking at the details of why the right kind of globalization does not happen, it is more useful to have a positive approach and consider the factors which will help build the right kind of globalization. | |
| The simulation results indicate that while the direct effect of globalization has had a larger effect in the United Kingdom than in either the United States or the Euro Area, it explains only a portion of the developments and U. K. specific factors played an important role. | |
| As a potential explanation of why globalization might improve the distribution of income among Mexican households, we show that states that are more integrated to the world economy offer better work opportunities for low-skilled women relative to more educated female workers. | |
| The issue is thus not whether financial globalization is inherently good or bad, but whether it can be done right. | |
32 Citations | The benefits of NATO globalization are greatest for the United States. |
| Clearly there is truth in this, but globalization is a more complex process with its own logic and demands that are affecting the United States. | |
| The big argument for why this is so emphasizes globalization and technological change, which together have heightened international trade and investment competition. | |
29 Citations | For the key members of the Bush foreign policy team, globalization is now seen not simply in neoliberal economic terms, but also through the lenses of the national security agenda of the United States. |
178 Citations | There are specific reasons why the economistic understanding of globalization has, at least in the short run, gained widespread acceptance. |
14 Citations | This is perhaps one of the reasons why talking a lot about globalization has become an academic fashion within and without our discipline, especially in China in recent years. |
Related Questions
Is Globalization good or bad?4 answersGlobalization has both positive and negative effects. It can lead to more globally oriented strategies and benefit economies and the global economy as a whole. However, it can also result in unemployment, economic instability, and speculation in financial markets. The impact of globalization on workers is debated, with economists generally stating that it is good for workers and sociologists, anthropologists, and historians taking a more cautious approach. Overall, the question of whether globalization is good or bad does not have a clear-cut answer and depends on various factors such as the perspective, context, and specific dimensions of employment quality.
Does the US support globalization?14 answers
Has globalization hurt the US?9 answers
How has globalization affected the USA?8 answers
Is globalization good or bad for America?9 answers
Why is globalization bad for the United States?5 answers