scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

What are the state-of-the-art review papers on causal inference? 


Best insight from top research papers

State-of-the-art review papers on causal inference encompass various domains like software engineering and AI models. In software engineering, recent work has focused on applying statistical causal inference methods to estimate causal effects from observational data, with a review of 32 papers highlighting the fragmented research community . On the other hand, in the realm of AI models, causal modeling and inference methods have emerged as powerful tools to enhance trustworthiness, addressing issues like generalization, fairness, and interpretability. A review paper aims to provide an overview of causal methods developed to improve the trustworthiness of AI models, encouraging further research in causality-based solutions for trustworthy AI .

Answers from top 5 papers

More filters
Papers (5)Insight
"A Review of the Role of Causality in Developing Trustworthy AI Systems" discusses state-of-the-art causal methods for improving trustworthy AI, serving as a valuable review paper on causal inference.
Not addressed in the paper.
State-of-the-art review papers on causal inference in Image Captioning are surveyed, categorizing models based on adjustment methods to address dataset bias in training for advanced performance.
Not addressed in the paper.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Jungeun Kim, Junyeong Kim 
05 Feb 2023
Not addressed in the paper.

Related Questions

What is the cutting edge research on causal inference?5 answersCutting-edge research on causal inference spans various domains. Recent advancements include the development of causal estimands in recurrent event settings, clarifying interpretations of classical statistical estimands in the presence of competing events. Additionally, the introduction of a method utilizing genetic data from parents and offspring allows for causal inferences immune to confounding, enhancing power and localization compared to traditional tests. In cognitive neuroscience, emphasis is placed on the importance of causal knowledge for interventions, connecting inference methods with scientific goals and challenges. Furthermore, a novel framework combining deep learning and double machine learning enables the estimation of causal effects for unobserved treatment combinations, showcasing superior performance in identifying optimal treatment combinations. These advancements highlight the ongoing progress in enhancing causal inference methodologies across diverse fields.
How to do causal inference with machine learning models?4 answersCausal inference with machine learning models can be done by combining predictive machine learning models with analytical estimations of average treatment effects. This approach allows for the utilization of any predictive model for causal inference, making it adaptable to existing systems. The process involves estimating the average treatment effect of an intervention on predictors, determining the causal relationship between the intervention and a wide range of variables. Artificial samples are then created and evaluated using the predictive model to link interventions and outcomes, providing measurements of uncertainty. Simulations are performed using the predictive model to compute measurements of confidence and compare the effects of specific treatments. This approach can also be adapted to privacy-preserving federated learning environments, where training data is distributed across multiple datasets.
How is causal inference used in deep learning?4 answersCausal inference is used in deep learning to understand the causal relationships and estimate the effect size in complex systems. It helps identify risk factors, disease mechanisms, and candidate therapeutics for diseases. Deep learning models often fit undesired dataset bias in training, and causal inference can be used to uncover causalities among key factors and pursue the desired causal effect without bias. Additionally, causal inference is used in deep learning to estimate the causal effect of treatment combinations in large-scale online platforms, even when only a small subset of combinations is observed. It is also applied to develop causality-aware coverage criteria for testing the correctness and robustness of deep neural networks, considering how neurons jointly make predictions. Causal inference in deep learning is achieved through various methods, including deep neural networks, double machine learning, and structural causal models.
Is causal inference used in the field of catalytic science?5 answersCausal inference is used in various fields, including catalytic science. The move from causal to catalytic models has brought major breakthroughs in chemistry and biology. In the field of catalytic science, the use of simple cause-effect notions in psychology is recommended to be overcome, and catalytic thinking is suggested as a better approach. Additionally, the study of how actions, interventions, or treatments affect outcomes of interest, which is a key aspect of causal inference, has been applied in the context of observational studies to deliver valuable insights in data science. Therefore, causal inference plays a role in catalytic science, both in terms of theoretical models and practical applications.
What are temporal causal inference techniques?5 answersTemporal causal inference techniques involve analyzing the relationships between variables in time series data to determine cause and effect. These techniques aim to understand the temporal patterns and underlying causal mechanisms in complex dynamical systems. Time-series representations such as discrete Fourier and wavelet transforms are commonly used to study the temporal structure of these systems. Traditional methods often assume a predefined time lag between cause and effect, but this may not accurately capture the true lag in real-world applications. Recent research has focused on developing methods that can estimate the lag among different time series variables from the data itself, allowing for more accurate causal inference. These techniques have been shown to be effective in learning the temporal causal relationships and can provide valuable insights into the interactive scheme of temporal variables.
Can machine learning be used for causal inference?5 answersMachine learning can be used for causal inference. It allows researchers to estimate causal effects and uncover heterogeneity in these effects. By combining machine learning with causal inference, potential biases in estimating causal effects can be addressed, and sources of effect heterogeneity can be identified. This is particularly important for generalizing findings to populations beyond those under study. Machine learning algorithms, such as Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART), can be used to model the relationship between outcomes, covariates, and a treatment to estimate causal effects. Additionally, machine learning can be incorporated into causal inference to estimate the causal mean and address challenges such as slower convergence and complexity of the nuisance model. The use of machine learning in causal inference enables researchers to make more principled estimations of causal effects and improve the accuracy of their findings.

See what other people are reading

What is cross-sectional study?
5 answers
A cross-sectional study is an observational research method where exposure and outcome are assessed simultaneously. It is commonly used to determine prevalence, analyze health characteristics, and test associations without implying causation. These studies are cost-effective, quick to conduct, and provide preliminary evidence for future research. While they may not establish causality due to limitations like sampling biases and the inability to establish temporal relationships between exposure and outcome in all cases, cross-sectional studies can still offer valuable insights into associations between variables and disease incidence. Despite concerns about reverse causality and limitations in assessing disease incidence or past exposures, a nuanced evaluation of cross-sectional study data can provide valuable information for understanding causal relationships.
How climate change impact to Filipino farmers?
4 answers
Climate change impacts Filipino farmers by increasing their vulnerability to natural disasters like typhoons, droughts, and pest infestations. Studies show that climate change significantly affects agricultural production in the Philippines, with variables like agricultural employment, temperature, and La Nina playing crucial roles in agricultural output. Furthermore, farmers in the Philippines face direct stressors such as bureaucratic hurdles and poverty, as well as distal stressors like infrastructure development, which hinder their ability to adapt to climate change effectively. Assessments in Agusan del Norte reveal that flooding and drought pose significant hazards to farmlands, highlighting the urgent need for strengthened adaptive capacity and climate-resilient agriculture practices among Filipino farmers. Overall, addressing these challenges requires government support, research and development in agriculture, and policy interventions to enhance resilience and sustainability in the agricultural sector.
How is machine learning can be used with causal inference to optimize HIV treatment using time varying covariates?
4 answers
Machine learning can enhance causal inference for optimizing HIV treatment with time-varying covariates. By combining predictive models with analytical estimations of treatment effects, a causal machine learning pipeline can determine the impact of interventions on various predictors, enabling a broad understanding of causal relationships. This approach allows for the creation of artificial samples to link interventions with outcomes, providing insights into uncertainty and confidence measurements. Techniques like propensity matching and conditional average treatment effect estimation can be utilized to measure the impact of new treatment strategies, especially in scenarios where traditional methods like A-B testing are limited. Leveraging Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART) in modeling relationships between outcomes, covariates, and treatments can further aid in estimating causal effects in observational data.
Is there any warp drive solution that does not need negative energy density?
5 answers
Various studies have explored warp drive solutions without requiring negative energy density. By considering matter content in the form of anisotropic fluids, it has been demonstrated that the energy density in warp metrics can depend on fluid variables, even for dust or isotropic fluids where densities are zero, thus eliminating the need for negative energies. The inclusion of a cosmological constant type term in the metric calculations has shown a trade-off between weak and strong energy conditions, allowing for solutions where energy conditions are partially satisfied without resorting to negative energy densities. These findings challenge the prevailing notion that warp drives inherently demand negative mass-energy densities, highlighting the potential for warp solutions that do not rely on negative energy requirements.
Which studies show that financial development has no impact economic growth?
5 answers
Studies by Hasan. Aydın Okuyanand Edmunds Čižo et al.provide insights into the relationship between financial development and economic growth, suggesting that there may not always be a direct impact. Okuyan's study on developing countries found that causality relationships varied among countries, with no clear consensus on the impact of financial development on economic growth. Similarly, Čižo et al. highlighted the aftermath of the 2008-2010 financial crises, leading to a reevaluation of the positive impact of financial sector growth on economic growth rates. These studies indicate that the relationship between financial development and economic growth is complex and context-dependent, with some cases showing no significant impact of financial development on economic growth.
How can peer pressure be reduced?
5 answers
Peer pressure can be reduced through various mechanisms. One effective way is by introducing neutral peers into the environment, as seen in studies on umpiring bias in cricket matches. This presence of neutral colleagues can temporarily debias individuals due to the social pressure to be impartial. Additionally, firms can invest in internal controls to mitigate peer pressure for manipulation, as evidenced by research on firms' investment decisions. Such investments create positive externalities by reducing manipulation pressure on managers in peer firms. Moreover, promoting individual reflection and awareness, as highlighted in a personal anecdote about a child's experience with peer pressure, can also help individuals resist negative influences. Overall, a combination of neutral peer presence, internal control investments, and individual reflection can effectively reduce peer pressure.
What are the factors that influence the optimization of long duration medical surgeries for maximum duration?
4 answers
Factors influencing the optimization of long-duration medical surgeries for maximum duration include patient parameters, hospital factors, and surgical scheduling methods. Patient factors such as age and sex can impact surgery duration. Hospital factors like the type of hospital and surgeon experience also play a role in surgery duration. Efficient surgery scheduling, based on accurate estimation of surgery durations, is crucial for maximizing resource utilization and minimizing delays. Utilizing regression models and simulation policies can aid in estimating surgery durations and improving scheduling practices for enhanced efficiency in surgical operations. Optimization strategies focusing on blood flow, oxygen delivery, and tissue oxygenation are essential for reducing morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay length in high-risk surgical patients.
What are the main challenges to identification of causal effects to watch for in spatial difference in difference?
4 answers
Identifying causal effects in spatial difference-in-difference (DiD) analyses presents several unique challenges, primarily due to the inherent characteristics of spatial data and the complexity of spatial relationships. One of the main challenges is the nonrandom, nonrepeatability, and synchronism of spatial data, which complicates causal inference in spatial statistics. Spatial settings often involve units whose outcomes may be influenced by exposures at multiple locations, and confounders that are spatially structured, adding layers of complexity to causal analysis. Another significant challenge is spatial confounding and interference, which can manifest as each other. This duality means that efforts to investigate one can lead to incorrect conclusions in the presence of the other, complicating the identification of true causal relationships. Moreover, statistical dependencies in the exposure can invalidate standard analyses, necessitating sophisticated methods that account for these dependencies to avoid biased conclusions. The spatial first differences (SFD) approach has been developed to address some of these challenges by regressing the SFD of the outcome on the treatment and omitting all covariates. This method is robust to unobservable heterogeneity and does not require instruments, but it relies on the assumption that local changes in the treatment and unobservable confounders are not systematically correlated between immediately adjacent neighbors. However, this approach, while innovative, does not fully mitigate the issues of spatial confounding and interference. Recent methods aim to infer causal effects across space by eliminating nuisance functions and mitigating errors-in-variables, offering a robust and accurate inference method for spatially varying heterogeneous causal effects. Additionally, the development of spatially aware machine learning models, such as the “causal” forest, represents an advance in addressing the unique issues presented by geographically referenced data, though challenges in accurately fracturing the spatial fabric of geographic data for test and training sets remain. In summary, the main challenges in identifying causal effects in spatial DiD analyses include dealing with the nonrandomness and complex spatial dependencies of data, spatial confounding and interference, and the need for sophisticated analytical methods that can accurately account for spatially structured unmeasured predictors and dependencies in exposure.
What are the causes and consequences of affective polarization in society?
10 answers
Affective polarization, characterized by intense negative feelings between partisan groups, has been identified as a significant societal risk, threatening democratic institutions and reducing our capacity to respond to pressing societal challenges such as climate change, pandemics, or rising inequality. The causes of affective polarization are multifaceted. One primary driver is the identification with opinion-based groups, such as those formed during Britain's 2016 referendum on European Union membership, which generate polarization as intense as traditional partisanship. Digital media also plays a crucial role by facilitating a sorting of differences and a breakdown of social cohesion, suggesting a causal link between digital media usage and rising affective polarization. Furthermore, new media technology fosters extreme views and political conflict by enabling self-segregation into echo chambers, exacerbating this polarization through social psychological mechanisms of social identity. The consequences of affective polarization extend beyond the erosion of mutual respect and willingness to engage in cross-political dialogue. It has been linked to hampered policymaking, weakened trust in democratic institutions, and a growing dislike among voters towards their political opponents, known as affective polarisation. Despite the negative implications, some studies suggest that affective polarization might encourage political participation, raising the stakes of politics. However, efforts to reduce affective polarization through depolarization interventions have shown limited success in reducing anti-democratic attitudes, questioning the assumed causal effect of affective polarization on such attitudes. The model of affective polarization via quasi‐Bayesian inference further explains the growth in hostility over time between parties, highlighting cognitive biases as a significant cause of the devolution of relationships in politics and beyond. This complex interplay of causes and consequences underscores the challenges in addressing affective polarization in society.
What is a cross sectional study design in mental health in a conflict setting??
5 answers
A cross-sectional study design in mental health within a conflict setting involves assessing mental health outcomes, such as anxiety, PTSD, depression, and comorbid mental disorders, at a single point in time. These studies are crucial for understanding the prevalence of mental health conditions, identifying associated factors like trauma exposure and social determinants, and evaluating access to mental health services. They provide valuable insights into the impact of conflict on mental well-being, highlighting the need for community-based mental health programs. However, limitations such as biases due to sampling and the inability to establish causal relationships should be considered when interpreting the results of cross-sectional studies in conflict settings.
How the use of a cross-sectional design in a research hinders the ability to demonstrate a casual relationship?
4 answers
The use of a cross-sectional design in research can hinder the ability to demonstrate a causal relationship due to several limitations. Cross-sectional studies, while useful for assessing factors associated with health at a specific moment, often lack a clear temporal association between exposure and outcome, leading to difficulties in establishing causality. These studies may be limited to assessing disease prevalence rather than incidence, providing estimates of current rather than past exposures, and being susceptible to reverse causality. However, not all cross-sectional studies suffer from these limitations, and assuming these constraints exist in all cases overlooks the potential insights they can offer into causal relationships. Despite these challenges, cross-sectional studies can still provide valuable information on generalized relationships between elements and conditions, contributing to the development and testing of theories about these relationships.