Search or ask a question

When did noise Colorfit Pro 3 release?

Equivalent circuit

Noise (electronics)

Answers from top 7 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (7)	Insight
Journal Article•DOI Input impedance conditions for minimizing the noise figure of an analog optical link Edward I. Ackerman, Iii. C. Cox, Gary E. Betts, H. Roussell, Frederick J. O'Donnell, K.G. Ray - Show less +5 more 01 Dec 1998-IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 53 Citations	We believe this is the first demonstration of amplifierless link noise figure of less than 3 dB.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI The effect of a hearing conservation program on adolescents' attitudes towards noise. Shawna M Dell, Alice E. Holmes - Show less +1 more 01 Jan 2012-Noise & Health 22 Citations	It was established that an HCP facilitated a change in pro-noise attitudes among adolescents.
Journal Article•DOI Equivalent Sheet Resistance of Intrinsic Noise in Sub-100-nm MOSFETs Chih-Hung Chen, Ryan Lee, Ge Tan, D.C. Chen, Peiming Lei, Chune-Sin Yeh - Show less +5 more 08 Jun 2012-IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 6 Citations	This newly defined noise sheet resistance is particularly helpful when comparing the noise performance of devices in different technology nodes for low-noise applications.
Journal Article•DOI Encoding and decoding target locations with waves in the turtle visual cortex Xiuxia Du, Bijoy K. Ghosh, Philip S. Ulinski - Show less +2 more 21 Mar 2005-IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 26 Citations	Assuming that the noise is colored provided a more reliable estimate than did the assumption of a white noise in the cortical output.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Calculation of the Performance of Communication Systems From Measured Oscillator Phase Noise M. Reza Khanzadi, Dan Kuylenstierna, Ashkan Panahi, Thomas Eriksson, Herbert Zirath - Show less +4 more 06 Jan 2014-IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems 122 Citations	Our results also show that 1/f 3 noise is more predictable compared to 1/f 2 noise and in a fair comparison it affects the performance less.
Proceedings Article•DOI Acoustics Measurements of Scale Models of Military Style Supersonic Beveled Nozzle Jets with Interior Corrugations Russell W. Powers, Dennis K. McLaughlin - Show less +1 more 04 Jun 2012 21 Citations	The results show that significant noise reductions of over 3 dB of both the mixing noise and the broad band shock associated noise can be achieved.
Journal Article•DOI Synthetic turbulence methods for computational aeroacoustic simulations of leading edge noise Fernando Gea-Aguilera, James Gill, Xin Zhang - Show less +2 more 03 Nov 2017-Computers & Fluids 35 Citations	Tests show that this approach is capable of reproducing experimental noise measurements to within an accuracy of 3 dB, and predicts similar noise levels to fully three-dimensional simulations.

My columns

Related Questions

Is Noise Colorfit pro good?9 answers

When did noise Colorfit Pro 2 come out?6 answers

When is noise Colorfit Pro 3 launch date?10 answers

When was noise Colorfit launched?7 answers

Where is the serial number of noise Colorfit Pro 3?8 answers

Where to find serial number of noise Colorfit Pro 3?8 answers

See what other people are reading

Why traffic density affect the surrounding housing price?

Traffic density affects surrounding housing prices due to the negative impact of traffic nuisances on property values. Studies show that increased traffic intensity leads to a substantial decrease in housing prices, with a doubling of traffic density resulting in a 2% reduction in property values. Additionally, the presence of traffic noise, which tends to increase disproportionately to the noise produced, has a significant negative relationship with housing values, leading to an average devaluation of 1,900 ITL per percentage point of people disturbed by noise per square meter of surface area. Urban projects like highways can also influence housing prices, with areas closer to highways experiencing less growth in land and housing prices compared to areas further away from the project site.What are the negative impact of Drones in terms of Noise Pollution for Emergency services?

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) utilized in emergency services can have negative impacts in terms of noise pollution. Studies have shown that as UAVs operate at low altitudes, their noise impact on human health becomes more pronounced, especially with the development of advanced technologies. Noise measurements of different UAVs revealed that parameters for hexarotors were higher than quadrotors, with participants distinguishing between the noise of UAVs and having a more negative experience with hexarotors. Despite the noise perception, over 80% of respondents believed that the pros of UAV integration into everyday life outweigh the cons. Therefore, while UAVs offer significant benefits in emergency response, their noise pollution can pose challenges that need to be addressed for effective and sustainable deployment.What are the negative impact of Supersonic Jets in terms of Training for Ground staff?

Supersonic jets can have negative impacts on ground staff training due to the high noise levels they produce. The intense noise generated by supersonic jet engines, especially during take-off and landing, can lead to severe hearing damage for ground personnel. Additionally, the screech tones produced by these jets can reach sound pressure levels of up to 160 dB, causing immense noise pollution and potential structural fatigue. Therefore, training programs for ground staff working in close proximity to supersonic jets need to address the risks associated with exposure to high noise levels and implement measures to protect the hearing and overall well-being of the personnel.What are the negative impact of Supersonic Jets in terms of Safety Concerns for Ground staff?

Supersonic jets pose safety concerns for ground staff due to high noise levels and potential structural damage. The noise generated by supersonic jet operations can lead to severe hearing damage for personnel working near the aircraft. Additionally, the interaction between the jet exhaust shock structure and fluidic injection methods affects the total noise radiation, impacting the health and safety of ground staff. Furthermore, when supersonic jets interact with obstacles or the ground, the behavior of the jet can change significantly, influencing factors like flammability limits and cloud extent of substances released, which are crucial in safety assessments. These factors highlight the importance of considering the proximity of supersonic jets to the ground and implementing appropriate safety measures to protect ground staff from potential hazards.What are the negative impact of Supersonic Jets in terms of Infrastructure for Cargo companies?

Supersonic jets, due to their complex shock patterns and imperfect expansion, can lead to immense noise pollution and structural fatigue, impacting infrastructure for cargo companies. The shocks interacting with turbulent mixing layers can generate screech tones reaching sound pressure levels of up to 160 dB, causing significant noise issues. Additionally, sonic booms from supersonic transports can reach the ground after refraction, resulting in low-frequency "rumbles" that may affect infrastructure due to their attenuation and dispersion effects. These environmental impacts, combined with the emissions primarily in the stratosphere, can pose challenges for cargo companies operating in areas affected by supersonic aircraft operations.What are the negative impact of Supersonic Jets in terms of for Suppliers of aircraft parts?

Supersonic jets, due to their unique shock patterns and noise characteristics, pose challenges for suppliers of aircraft parts. The complex shock-cell structures in supersonic jets lead to the generation of broadband shock-associated noise (BBSAN) and screech tones, reaching sound pressure levels of up to 160 dB, causing immense noise pollution and structural fatigue. Additionally, supersonic impinging jets result in high-pressure and acoustic loads on nearby structures, leading to lift loss, ground erosion, and hot gas ingestion issues. These adverse effects necessitate specialized components to withstand the high unsteady loads and noise levels associated with supersonic aircraft, impacting suppliers in terms of design complexity, material requirements, and performance standards.What are the negative impact of Supersonic Jets in terms of Increased Competition for Suppliers of aircraft parts?

Supersonic jets, due to their unique characteristics, can pose challenges in terms of increased competition for suppliers of aircraft parts. The design and operation of supersonic aircraft involve addressing issues such as supersonic jet noise reduction, complex shock patterns leading to noise pollution and structural fatigue, and the presence of screech tones with sound pressure levels exceeding 160 dB. These factors necessitate specialized components and technologies, potentially creating a higher demand for specific parts and systems. The development and maintenance of supersonic jets may require suppliers to meet stringent requirements for noise reduction, shock pattern mitigation, and structural integrity, leading to a competitive environment among suppliers to provide these specialized components efficiently and effectively.How to connect wind turbine to heater?

To connect a wind turbine to a heater, various methods and technologies can be employed based on the specific requirements and conditions. One approach involves utilizing a cross-flow wind turbine to generate mechanical energy, which can then be converted into electrical energy for heating purposes. Additionally, direct heating of wind turbines can be achieved by using a voltage limiting unit interconnected with the wind turbine's DC link, which dissipates electrical energy into heat to warm the air inside the facility when the voltage exceeds a threshold level. Experimental studies have also explored the use of wind energy to supply heat, with mathematical models developed to determine the operational parameters of electric pulse heaters based on random wind speeds, showcasing the potential for utilizing wind power for heating applications.What is the effectiveness of noise mapping using ArcGIS in identifying areas with high levels of noise pollution?

Noise mapping using ArcGIS has proven effective in identifying areas with high levels of noise pollution in urban settings. Studies conducted in cities like Gazipur, Antalya, Baghdad, and India have utilized ArcGIS for noise mapping, allowing for the measurement, classification, and visualization of noise levels across different zones. The use of interpolation techniques like IDW in ArcGIS aids in creating detailed noise maps that highlight noise hotspots and areas exceeding standard noise levels. By integrating spatial data with noise measurements, ArcGIS facilitates the identification of sources contributing to noise pollution, enabling the development of targeted solutions and policies for noise control in urban environments. Overall, ArcGIS-based noise mapping emerges as a valuable tool for understanding, managing, and mitigating noise pollution in various cities.What is bootstrap t-test?

The bootstrap t-test is a statistical method that has shown superior performance compared to the traditional Student's t-test, especially in medical research and experimental particle physics. It involves resampling data to create multiple samples, allowing for more robust inference even when assumptions like normality are violated. The bootstrap t-test has been proven to outperform the Student's t-test in terms of accuracy, true-negative rates, and diagnostic abilities, as demonstrated in studies analyzing COVID-19 serial interval data. Additionally, it has been proposed as a technique to efficiently determine extreme tails of the T-distribution, enabling quick evaluation of confidence intervals and improving computational efficiency in various testing scenarios. The method has also been successfully applied in testing regression time series and handling serial correlation in biological studies.How is a cut-off value determined on frequency tables?

A cut-off value on frequency tables can be determined using various methods discussed in the provided contexts. These methods include the Mean±2SD method, Logistic Regression Analysis, Receivers Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, Discriminant Analysis (DA). Additionally, a cutoff frequency determination method involves quantizing the distribution of signals before and after filtering, then determining the cutoff frequency based on the Shannon entropy trajectory. Cut-off sampling methods are also utilized, such as the LH algorithm and a new cost function minimization approach, to optimize cut-off points in business surveys. Furthermore, the determination of epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) for antimicrobial susceptibility testing requires a systematic approach based on quality-controlled minimum inhibitory concentration series. These methods collectively contribute to accurately determining cut-off values on frequency tables for various analytical purposes.