Which network is inherently more robust about link failure or node failure due to redundancy in the network?
Answers from top 7 papers
More filters
| Papers (7) | Insight |
|---|---|
| In this paper we propose the use of multi-topology (MT) routing for network resilience against link and node failures. | |
14 Citations | In practice, different networks may be interdependent such that the failure in one network may result in the failure in another network. |
22 May 2005 | Link redundancy may be critical to cope with faults such as node failures and link disruptions. |
70 Citations | Furthermore link failures in the network can be s-dependent. |
63 Citations | In addition, the paper illustrates the significance of the knowledge of failure location by illustrating that network with higher connectivity may require lesser capacity than one with a lower connectivity to recover from dual-link failures. |
| Resilience against single link failures can be built into the network by providing backup paths, which are used when an edge failure occurs on a primary path. | |
01 Dec 2011 | The main results of this paper provide, for the first time, analytical conditions for the maximum tolerable link failure uncertainty to maintain mean square synchronization among the network components. |
Related Questions
What are the key factors that influence the accuracy of Graph Neural Networks in failure prediction?5 answersThe accuracy of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) in failure prediction is influenced by several key factors. Firstly, the instability of trained models, where individual node predictions vary due to random factors, can impact the reliability of predictions. Additionally, the size of the training set, model hyperparameters, and node properties play crucial roles in determining the stability of predictions, with larger training sets and optimized hyperparameters contributing to improved model performance and reduced instability. Moreover, the use of physics-informed loss functions in GNN-based models can enhance accuracy by directly following physical equations, leading to more interpretable results and efficient simulations of cascading failures in power systems.
What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of implementing link failure rerouting based on SDN?5 answersImplementing link failure rerouting based on SDN offers several potential benefits. It allows for the quick recovery of network links in the event of failures, reducing packet loss and improving network performance. SDN-based rerouting mechanisms can also optimize network bandwidth by efficiently sharing traffic among different providers. Additionally, SDN enables the decoupling of control and data planes, providing better network management and flexibility. However, there are also drawbacks to consider. Implementing SDN-based link failure rerouting may require additional memory demand per switch, which can impact network speed and processing efficiency. Furthermore, the selection of backup paths and rerouting strategies must consider factors such as path criticality and residual path capacity to avoid post-recovery congestion and ensure service availability.
Are neural networks robust againts noise?5 answersNeural networks have been shown to be robust against noise in various applications. For example, a proposed neural network architecture achieved decent noise robustness when faced with input data with white noise, even outperforming humans in recognizing very noisy images. Another study applied the localized stochastic sensitivity (LSS) approach to improve the robustness of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) in time series forecasting tasks, reducing the impact of input noises on the network's performance. Additionally, incorporating noisy and noise-free images in the training set of a convolutional neural network (CNN) has been shown to increase the network's generalization and classification accuracy when processing noisy data. These findings suggest that neural networks can exhibit robustness against noise, making them suitable for real-world applications.
What is the network effect? node and link?5 answersThe network effect refers to the increase in value or benefits that a product or service provides as more people use it. It can be categorized into direct and indirect network effects. Direct network effects occur when the consumption benefits of a product increase for everyone on the same network as the number of consumers on that network increases. Indirect network effects arise when an increase in the number of users of a particular hardware product leads to an increased demand for compatible software, resulting in more software varieties being supplied. In the context of social networks, the network effect can also refer to the prediction of undiscovered links in the network based on node similarity. Node similarity-based algorithms, such as the LP and Katz indexes, have been found to have high prediction accuracy in social network link prediction.
Why network breakage happened?5 answersNetwork breakage can occur due to various reasons. In the case of the power blackout on the east side of North America, it was caused by a computer error that led to the shutdown of a generating plant, which in turn put a strain on high-voltage power lines that failed when they came in contact with overgrown trees. In the context of multicast routing in wireless networks, link breakage can limit performance, but network coding can help alleviate this issue by encoding data packets and using a disjoint-path tree for routing, which improves packet delivery ratio and multicast capacity. In the study of isopropanol crystallization, a breakage of the hydrogen-bond network was found to be a precursor step for crystallization. In micro drilling processes, the breakage of drill bits can occur due to the small drill diameter, and on-line detection methods based on neural networks have been developed to effectively detect drill breakage. In the case of major telephone network crashes in the US, poorly designed "local rules" governing network response to unexpected events partially caused the crashes.
How can we design a network that is resilient to failure?5 answersRobust network design, which aims to guarantee network availability under various failure scenarios while optimizing performance/cost objectives, has received significant attention. Existing approaches often rely on model-based mixed-integer optimization that is hard to scale or employ deep learning to solve specific engineering problems yet with limited generalizability. In this paper, we show that failure evaluation provides a common kernel to improve the tractability and scalability of existing solutions. By providing a neural network function approximation of this common kernel using graph attention networks, we develop a unified learning-based framework, FERN, for scalable Failure Evaluation and Robust Network design. Many real-world systems interact with one another through dependency links, which reduces the system robustness. In this work, we develop a theoretical framework for analyzing the robustness of interdependent directed networks under localized attacks. In this paper, we present algorithms for designing networks that are robust to node failures with minimal or limited number of links. The interdependence between communication networks and power grids is a critical issue to take into account when designing and operating both systems. Failures in one network may cause further failures in the other network and vice versa. Therefore, a robust "interdependency network" is needed.