scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Which part of the solar cooker is possible for greenhouse effect? 

Thermal efficiency
Payback period
Hot box
Cooker
Reflector (antenna)

Answers from top 9 papers

More filters
Papers (9)Insight
Journal Article•DOI
Low cost realisation of a high temperature solar cooker
Ian Edmonds
01 Jun 2018-Renewable Energy
22 Citations
The solar cooker is inexpensive to fabricate and simple and safe to use.
Journal Article•DOI
Performance studies of a large size nontracking solar cooker
N.M. Nahar
01 Aug 1992-Renewable Energy
9 Citations
The performance of this solar cooker is comparable with that of a solar oven.
Journal Article•DOI
Performance evaluation on solar box cooker with reflector tracking at optimal angle under Bahir Dar climate
Amanuel Weldu, Li Zhao, Shuai Deng, Nigussie Mulugeta, Ying Zhang, Xianhua Nie, Weicong Xu 
01 Mar 2019-Solar Energy
33 Citations
It can be concluded from the experiments that effective utilization of all solar radiation intercepted on the reflector, and the use of cooking vessel having a reasonably good thermal diffusivity contribute significant roles to improve the cooking performance of the cooker.
Journal Article•DOI
Modeling of energy distribution inside greenhouse using concept of solar fraction with and without reflecting surface on north wall
Ravi Dutt Gupta, G.N. Tiwari 
01 Jan 2005-Building and Environment
26 Citations
The proposed model can also be used to determine the distribution of solar radiation for any other place and shape of the greenhouse.
Journal Article•DOI
Box type solar cookers with sensible thermal energy storage medium: A comparative experimental investigation and thermodynamic analysis
Pinar Mert Cuce
15 May 2018-Solar Energy
51 Citations
The results clearly indicate that absorber plate temperature in conventional solar cooker has a notable decreasing tendency toward sunset, which totally affects the overall thermal performance of the system.
Journal Article•DOI
Design, development and testing of a double reflector hot box solar cooker with a transparent insulation material
N.M. Nahar
01 Jun 2001-Renewable Energy
93 Citations
Therefore, the use of a solar cooker is economical.
Journal Article•DOI
Design and development of a solar cooker for maximum energy capture in stationary mode
P.C. Pande, K.P. Thanvi 
01 Jan 1987-Energy Conversion and Management
23 Citations
This new cooker has been found to be more practical in comparison to the simple hot-box type solar cooker, where one needs to direct it to follow the sun.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI
Low cost solar cooker: Promising solution towards reducing indoor air pollution from solid fuel use
Namrata Sengar, Prabha Dashora, Sunita Mahavar 
01 Sep 2010-Indian journal of science and technology
26 Citations
The study reveals that the temperature profiles of the developed solar cooker are slightly better than the commercially available fibre body solar cooker.
Journal Article•DOI
The oven receiver: An approach toward the revival of concentrating solar cookers
M.B. Habeebullah, A.M.A. Khalifa, Ibrahim A. Olwi 
01 Apr 1995-Solar Energy
41 Citations
Introducing the oven type concept as an alternative approach for collecting the concentrated solar energy would drastically boost the overall cooker efficiency.

Related Questions

What is the efficiency of a solar cooker?5 answersThe efficiency of a solar cooker varies depending on the design and materials used. Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the efficiency of different solar cookers. One study found that the overall energy efficiency of a solar cooker was 10.3%. Another study compared the performance of different solar cookers and found that the exergy efficiency ranged from 13.47% to 48.51%. A different research paper reported an energy efficiency of 29.91% and an exergetic efficiency of 28.13% for a box-type solar cooker. Additionally, a study on a new design of solar cooker equipped with internal reflectors and a tracking-type bottom parabolic reflector reported an overall cooker efficiency of 10.7% to 12.5%. These findings demonstrate that the efficiency of a solar cooker can vary depending on factors such as design, materials, and cooking process.
What is the efficiency of an "solar pressure cooker"?5 answersThe efficiency of a solar pressure cooker varies depending on the design and materials used. Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the efficiency of different solar cookers. Tawfik et al. proposed a solar cooker equipped with internal reflectors and a tracking-type bottom parabolic reflector, which achieved an overall cooker efficiency of 10.7% to 12.5%. Thamizharasu et al. developed a solar cooker with a bar plate coated with nanolayer materials, which increased the efficiency by 37.69% to 49.21% using different volume fractions of nanoparticles. Khallaf et al. designed a Quonset solar cooker with dual cooking compartments and internal reflectors, achieving efficiencies ranging from 6% to 35% for water and 9% to 92% for glycerin as cooking fluids. The specific efficiency of a solar pressure cooker was not mentioned in the provided abstracts.
How can we make greenhouse effect for plants?8 answers
Which part of solar cooker is responsible for greenhouse gas effect?10 answers
Which part of solar cooker is responsible for the greenhouse effect?8 answers
Which part of the solar cooker is responsible for greenhouse gas?10 answers

See what other people are reading

What are the measurements used to measure startup success as a dependent variable?
5 answers
Startup success can be measured using various indicators. These include achieving significant revenue, obtaining financing, innovativeness of products, past success records of promoters, financial factors like profits, non-financial factors such as self-efficacy and risk-taking propensity, and networking efficiency within the startup community. Factors influencing startup success include the location of the startup, dedication of promoting partners, age of the company, existence of non-promoting partners. Financial success can be measured through discounted cash flow (DCF), internal rate of return (IRR), and payback period methods. Additionally, the success of startups can be predicted by analyzing their social network structures and connections within the startup community.How does the use of leidingwater for water purification compare to other methods in terms of cost and efficiency?
4 answers
The cost and efficiency of water purification methods vary based on the technique employed. Research suggests that incorporating water purification efforts in efficiency evaluation is crucial for accurate benchmarking and cost assessment. Among different methods, the Pressure Cooker method stands out for its cost-effectiveness and versatility, especially in underdeveloped regions like rural India. Additionally, the development of efficient water purification medicaments using specific raw materials has shown promising results in treating various types of wastewater at low costs and without secondary environmental pollution concerns. Overall, while traditional methods like filtration and chlorination are commonly used for water purification, innovative approaches like the Pressure Cooker method and specialized medicaments offer cost-effective and efficient alternatives for achieving safe and clean water.How do stakeholders view economic incentives for urban rainwater harvesting in relation to sustainable development goals?
5 answers
Stakeholders perceive economic incentives for urban rainwater harvesting as crucial for achieving sustainable development goals. Policies and regulations, such as national and municipal fee discounts and subsidy programs, play a significant role in motivating property owners to invest in rainwater management. The economic viability of rainwater harvesting systems depends on initial costs, maintenance expenses, and water fees, highlighting the importance of clear policies and government subsidies. While rainwater harvesting offers a green solution to urban water problems, systematic planning and optimization tools are essential for its successful implementation. Studies emphasize the positive impact of rainwater harvesting on economic benefits, suggesting the integration of such systems as tools for poverty reduction and sustainable development goals, alongside providing incentives for both commercial and non-commercial buildings. Additionally, research shows that rainwater harvesting contributes significantly to meeting water-related sustainable development goals, particularly in enhancing agricultural yields and promoting clean water and sanitation.How do stakeholders view economic incentives for rainwater harvesting in relation to sustainable development goals?
5 answers
Stakeholders perceive economic incentives for rainwater harvesting as crucial for achieving sustainable development goals. Studies highlight that existing economic instruments, such as discounts on rainwater drainage fees and municipal subsidies, motivate property owners to invest in rainwater management. Economic benefits of rainwater harvesting, including income, storage capacity, and water price, positively impact households, emphasizing the importance of financial incentives. Research on rainwater harvesting systems demonstrates their potential to contribute to sustainable development goals like zero hunger, good health, and clean water. Additionally, combined rainwater storage systems can significantly increase agricultural yields, supporting household nutrition and supplementing income, aligning with various Sustainable Development Goals. Stakeholders recognize the value of economic incentives in promoting rainwater harvesting for sustainable development.What is Techno-economic analysis in evaluating energy conversion?
4 answers
Techno-economic analysis (TEA) plays a crucial role in evaluating energy conversion processes by assessing both the technological and economic feasibility of different conversion technologies. It involves analyzing factors such as production costs, revenue generation, payback periods, net present value, and internal rate of return to determine the viability and profitability of energy conversion methods. TEA helps in comparing various technologies like liquefaction, gasification, and pyrolysis, considering their efficiency, costs, and environmental impact. By utilizing models, simulations, and sensitivity analyses, TEA aids in decision-making for selecting the most suitable energy conversion technology based on optimal conditions and economic performance. Overall, TEA serves as a valuable tool in guiding the development and commercialization of sustainable energy solutions.How do various methods for enhancing power output differ in terms of safety considerations?
5 answers
Various methods for enhancing power output differ in terms of safety considerations. For instance, a power safety system involving MOSFETs and a body controller is designed to prevent reverse current flow. On the other hand, a steam reheat process in a thermal power cycle aims to increase power output without atmospheric emissions by utilizing oxyfuel combustion and carbon dioxide capture. Additionally, the use of a thyristor with a controller can enhance power output by manipulating current flow between the anode, gate, and cathode, ultimately providing an enhanced voltage to the cathode. In contrast, the load raising process in gas turbines involves replacing air-cooled components with steam-cooled components to withstand high temperatures, ensuring operational safety. Each method addresses power enhancement while considering specific safety aspects relevant to its application.What is the role of anaerobic digestion in the treatment of cheese whey?
5 answers
Anaerobic digestion plays a crucial role in the treatment of cheese whey by converting it into valuable products like methane gas. Studies have shown that anaerobic digestion of cheese whey, either alone or in co-digestion with other agro-industrial wastewaters, can effectively mitigate environmental pollution while recovering energy-rich methane gas. The process can be optimized by controlling pH levels, as demonstrated by experiments where pH adjustment significantly improved methane production levels and overall process efficiency. Additionally, innovative systems like two-stage anaerobic digesters have been shown to enhance energy output and reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with cheese whey treatment, making them economically viable options for dairy industries. Anaerobic co-digestion with suitable co-substrates like coffee pulp residues further enhances the treatment efficiency of raw cheese whey, offering a sustainable solution to reduce environmental impact and potentially lower energy consumption costs in cheese production processes.What is the purpose of Memorandum No. 392 issued by the Department of Education?
4 answers
Memorandum No. 392 issued by the Department of Education aims to strengthen the management of physical education teachers and enhance students' learning outcomes in Physical Education (PE). This memorandum focuses on ensuring that higher education institutions comply with the requirements outlined in the memorandum to improve the quality of instruction in physical education and elevate student learning achievements. The implementation process of Memorandum No. 392 is crucial for teachers to understand the competencies necessary for student development and success in PE courses. By investigating the impact of this memorandum on the educational process, particularly in terms of student motivation, class orientation, participation, and the application of physical activity programs like PATHFIT, the Department of Education aims to enhance the overall quality of physical education and student outcomes.What are the current study on economic potential of solar irrigation system?
10 answers
Current studies on the economic potential of solar irrigation systems (SIS) highlight their viability and benefits across various regions and scenarios. Biberci's research in Konya, Turkiye, demonstrates that solar photovoltaic (PV) systems for agricultural irrigation are technically and economically appropriate, with a significant return on investment and a depreciation period of 8.7 years, alongside environmental benefits such as reduced CO2 emissions. Similarly, an assessment of off-grid solar energy systems for irrigation revealed the economic feasibility of photovoltaic projects, showing profitability across different power scenarios and sensitivity analyses. Kyeyune Isaac and Wanyama Joshua's study emphasizes the advantages of communal solar-powered irrigation systems, which, despite higher initial costs compared to conventional diesel systems, offer lower operation, maintenance, and lifecycle costs, making them feasible for projects exceeding three years. Guno and Agaton's analysis in the Philippines points out the socio-economic and environmental benefits for small-scale farmers, including significant GHG emission reductions and high returns on investment, although the high initial costs pose a barrier to adoption. In Bangladesh, Akter and Bari found solar pumps to be more cost-effective and environmentally friendly compared to diesel-run pumps, with profitability analysis and determinants identified for their use. Tuninetti and Falchetta's work supports the economic feasibility of solar irrigation in sub-Saharan Africa, highlighting its potential to improve food security and contribute to sustainable development goals. Hussain et al. discuss the challenges and opportunities in Pakistan, noting the cost-effectiveness and sustainability of solar-powered drip irrigation systems despite barriers to adoption. Kamruzzaman and Haque's study in Bangladesh indicates a longer payback period for solar pumps with batteries, suggesting policy implications for rural implementation. Lastly, two studies in Bangladesh by Islam and Hossain explore the financial feasibility and environmental benefits of solar irrigation pumps, recommending additional uses of solar energy to improve profitability and advocating for government support to enhance adoption rates. These studies collectively underscore the economic potential of solar irrigation systems, pointing to their feasibility, profitability, and environmental benefits across different global contexts, while also acknowledging the challenges related to initial costs and system implementation.What factors influence the cost recovery and payback period of stormwater management systems?
4 answers
The cost recovery and payback period of stormwater management systems are influenced by various factors. Factors affecting cost recovery include land prices, input prices, differences in biophysical regions, and design variations of the systems. The payback period for rainwater tanks is influenced by roof area, initial cost, and rate of return, with a power relationship observed between initial cost and payback period. Additionally, the size of the storage tank, cost savings, and the chosen tank size impact the feasibility and payback period of rainwater harvesting systems in different types of buildings. The design of stormwater management systems, such as the arrangement of cells and interconnectors, also plays a role in determining the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of these systems.What are methods to obtain stable income by introducing a Solar Water Pump system?
10 answers
Introducing a Solar Water Pump (SWP) system offers several methods to obtain a stable income, primarily through enhanced agricultural productivity, cost savings, and potential revenue generation from excess energy. Firstly, SWP systems, by providing a reliable water supply, directly support agricultural activities, enabling farmers to increase crop yields and thereby boost their income. The use of efficient motors, such as the four-phase switched reluctance motor drive and Brushless DC (BLDC) motors, ensures the reliability and cost-effectiveness of these systems under harsh environments, which is crucial for uninterrupted agricultural operations. Moreover, the reduction in the use of fossil fuels for water pumping, due to the adoption of solar energy, leads to significant cost savings. Traditional fossil fuel-based systems not only incur high operational costs but also have environmental implications. By switching to SWP systems, communities can save on electricity and reduce pollution, contributing to a healthier environment and lower running costs. Additionally, the economic feasibility of SWP systems is highlighted by their short payback period, estimated at around 4-4 years, after which the cost savings on electricity bills become a steady source of income for the system owner. Furthermore, the integration of SWP systems with the grid allows for the sale of surplus energy back to the grid, offering an additional revenue stream. This not only helps in earning revenue but also in contributing to the generation of clean energy. Lastly, innovative storage solutions, such as battery storage and water tank storage, ensure the continuous operation of SWP systems, even under varying climatic conditions. This reliability translates to consistent agricultural productivity and the possibility of a stable income, despite environmental challenges. In summary, SWP systems provide a multifaceted approach to achieving stable income through enhanced agricultural productivity, savings on operational costs, and the potential for earning revenue from excess energy production.