scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Who is responsible for setting up rules and regulations for technical education in the country? 

Answers from top 21 papers

More filters
Papers (21)Insight
It is therefore important to design interventions that focus on capacity building in, for example, aligning curricula with specific needs of ministries, andequip professionals with the necessary technical skills. In addition, the results indicate that policies and regulations exist in theory, but in practice, there are inadequate implementation strategies to encourage adherence and enforcement of the regulations and policies.
Using instrumental variables estimation to correct for the potential endogeneity of technical regulations, the analysis suggests that technical regulations substantially impinge on poor countries' exports: their weaker capacities to satisfy technical regulations lead them to specialize away from industries with heavier regulatory burdens.
Regulations need to accommodate technical change at different levels in the production process, including new product development and systems integration.
Laws and regulations of a country, in addition to being directly protective, often give administrators wide leeway for interpretation which results in restrictive trade flows.
and most of them are technical, related competent authorities should be authorized to set administrative regulations to form the standards for institution-founding and personnel training and evaluation.
The paper also shows that such activities should be of systemic character, based on the policy of institutions responsible for the labour market, as well as for education – especially in the area of technical education on middle level.
The higher the quality of government institutions in a country, the more stringent the implementation of environmental regulations.
The system of rules of the GATS pushes for the progressive liberalization of education all over the world and for the constitution of a new international regime on trade in education.
Rules set the standard of professional conduct; just following those rules, in a relatively robust but not unusual sense of "following those rules," just is acting as a responsible professional.
It draws from this the key developments and places these in the recent contemporary policy setting with the new skills agenda. Findings – The findings are that the government has substituted technical education with “the skills agenda” and is applying it relentlessly across the whole education system, including schools, which in turn is leading to confusion, overlaps and needless competition.
It can also be argued that for successful joint work of technical regulation and industrial safety it is necessary to learn how to accurately apply technical regulation tools, namely, to pay particular attention to the development of technical regulations that will satisfy both areas.
They include ensuring that courses and administrative activity conform to nationally established regulations and that management is up to standard, as well as evaluation of the education system and advisory functions.
Thus there is a great necessity for reforming Indian technical education system in line with the needs and expectations of the community and business sector.
The extent to which they do this is better explained by institutional aspects of regulations: how rules are made.
The results indicate a degree of conflict among staff regarding the role of Technical education, coupled with limited recognition for Technical subjects among employers.
In part the deployment of technologies, technical services, and techniques enables education to be co-opted as an institutional means for production and control.
When regulations are transparent and appropriately applied, they can provide information for parents and students in enabling them to make rational decisions on education choice.
Controlling for country-level governance regulations together with CSR requirements, leads to the irrelevance of most board composition indicators.
These rules may be useful for efficient safety control and education.
It places the monitoring and adaptation of rules central to its management process and emphasises the need for participation of the intended rule followers in the processes of rule-making, but more importantly in keeping those rules alive and up to date in a process of regular and explicit dialogue with first-line supervision, and through them with the technical, safety and legal experts on the system functioning.
The fact that rules are issued for very different purposes and within different technical and political environments has profound implications for both descriptive and prescriptive analysis.