Search or ask a question

Why is comorbidity so common?

Anxiety disorder

Answers from top 6 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (6)	Insight
Journal Article•DOI Social factors and comorbidity of depressive and anxiety disorders George W. Brown, T. O. Harris, M. J. Eales - Show less +2 more 01 Jun 1996-The British journal of psychiatry. Supplement 96 Citations	Such findings have important implications for comorbidity.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI A new generation of comorbidity research in the era of neuroscience and Research Domain Criteria Theodore P. Beauchaine, Dante Cicchetti - Show less +1 more 01 Nov 2016-Development and Psychopathology 26 Citations	It is perhaps not surprising that diagnostic hierarchies curtailed rates of comorbidity.
Journal Article•DOI Comorbidity and Psychological Science: Does One Size Fit All? Nancy A. Piotrowski 01 Mar 2007-Clinical Psychology-science and Practice 18 Citations	As such, there is a need to examine the concept of comorbidity more methodically.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Comorbidity in juvenile obsessive-compulsive disorder: a report from India. Reddy Yc, Prasuna Reddy, Shoba Srinath, Sumant Khanna, Sheshadri Sp, Satish Chandra Girimaji - Show less +5 more 01 Apr 2000-The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 41 Citations	Patterns of comorbidity in this study differed from those previously reported.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Patterns and Impact of Comorbidity and Multimorbidity Among Community-Resident American Indian Elders Robert John, Dave S. Kerby, Catherine Hagan Hennessy - Show less +2 more 01 Oct 2003-Gerontologist 113 Citations	IMPLICATIONS Our study improves understanding of comorbidity within an understudied and underserved population by characterizing comorbidity in conventional and novel ways.
Journal Article•DOI The complexity of psychiatric comorbidity: a conceptual and methodological discussion. Gaspare Vella, Massimiliano Aragona, Daniela Alliani - Show less +2 more 01 Jan 2000-Psychopathology 37 Citations	Biological and psychological hypotheses that investigate the complexity of comorbidity findings are here presented; it is underlined that comorbidity should be the epidemiological descriptive starting point to build hypotheses that must be clear and rigorously defined, with specified usefulness and limits.

My columns

Related Questions

Why is comorbidity considered as disease?5 answersComorbidity is considered as a disease due to its association with the onset of chronic noncommunicative diseases. The presence of two or more chronic diseases simultaneously, known as multimorbidity, can significantly impact a patient's health. Elevated oxidative stress caused by various factors like pollutant chemicals, genetics, and aging is a common thread in comorbid disease pairs. The challenges in managing patients with comorbidities include conflicting treatment guidelines, polypharmacy risks, and lack of evidence on optimal treatment strategies. Comorbidities can worsen the course of primary diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, leading to limitations in therapeutic options and increased mortality rates. Therefore, the interconnected nature of comorbidities with chronic diseases and their impact on patient health justifies considering comorbidity as a disease entity.

What are comorbidities in clinical diagnosis?4 answersComorbidities in clinical diagnosis refer to the coexistence of two or more distinct illnesses, disorders, or conditions in a single individual. It is the association of diseases in a patient at a higher rate than expected by chance. Comorbidities are common and can have significant implications for patient care, including increased morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. They are not limited to a specific field of medicine and can occur in various medical conditions. Understanding comorbidities is important for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning, as some disorders tend to occur together more frequently than they occur alone. The presence of comorbidities can complicate the diagnostic process, as symptoms may overlap and require careful consideration to determine the most appropriate diagnosis. Overall, comorbidities play a significant role in clinical medicine and require a comprehensive and integrated approach to patient care.

What is the prevalence of comorbidities in cancer patients?5 answersThe prevalence of comorbidities in cancer patients is high, with most patients having at least one comorbidity and nearly half having two or more comorbid conditions. Hypertension is the most common comorbidity, while physical disability is the least common. The prevalence and impact of comorbidities vary by cancer type, with liver and stomach cancer patients tending to have higher comorbidity rates, and breast cancer patients having lower rates. Comorbidity is associated with higher all-cause mortality, but the impact varies depending on the specific condition and cancer site. The presence of comorbidities affects the treatment, therapy outcomes, and survival of cancer patients, particularly in the elderly population. There is a need to consider specific comorbidity and cancer-site combinations when examining associations between comorbidity and cancer outcomes.

How many comorbidities does the average person have?5 answers

How many people have comorbidities?4 answers

Is comorbidity rare?3 answers

See what other people are reading

What interventions are in dual process model in grief counselling?

The Dual Process Model (DPM) in grief counseling incorporates interventions such as the "Be Together Program" (BTP), Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Compassion Focused Therapy (CFT). These interventions focus on oscillating between Loss-Orientation and Restoration-Orientation, which involve experiencing and accepting emotional pain while adapting to a new world without the deceased person. The DPM emphasizes coping flexibility, cultural integration, and the importance of therapeutic presence to facilitate acceptance and personal development. Studies suggest that interventions based on the DPM may be more effective than traditional grief therapy, especially for individuals with high levels of grief reaction. Further research is recommended to validate the model and intervention designs, ensuring consistent measures are used across studies.What is climate change anxiety?

Climate change anxiety refers to a state of heightened distress and worry about the current and future impacts of climate change. It is characterized by feelings of fear, helplessness, and impairment in everyday life functioning due to climate-related concerns. Individuals experiencing climate anxiety may exhibit symptoms such as sleep problems, depressed mood, and engagement in anxiety-maintaining coping behaviors. Studies have shown that climate anxiety is prevalent among various populations, including adolescents and young adults. Climate anxiety can lead individuals to consider climate change in various decision-making domains, such as family planning, career choices, and financial decisions. Addressing climate anxiety and providing psychological support to those affected is crucial to help individuals cope with their feelings and promote pro-environmental actions.How does the theory of academic struggle differ between GAS and other types of students?

The theory of academic struggle differs between General Academic Students (GAS) and other types of students in various ways. GAS construal heavily relies on comparisons with criterion-based and social standards, which are dominant drivers of learning-related anxiety. In contrast, non-traditional students often face additional barriers and struggles in higher education due to inequalities related to class, ethnicity, gender, and age, leading to a characterization of their university experience by "struggle". However, some low-income, high-achieving African-American adolescents who were familiar with struggle did not let it curtail their academic success; instead, their knowledge of struggle may have contributed to their sense of human agency and academic motivation. These insights highlight the complex interplay between academic struggle, student backgrounds, and motivational factors in educational settings.How do various resilience-building techniques compare to mental toughness training methods?

Resilience-building techniques and mental toughness training methods are both aimed at enhancing psychological resilience, yet they differ in focus and outcomes. Resilience-building techniques often incorporate a combination of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and mindfulness strategies, which have been shown to have a moderate positive effect on individual resilience. These techniques are not only applicable to specific populations, such as first responders, where mindfulness training (MT) has been found to significantly increase psychological resilience, but also in broader contexts, including workplace settings where resilience-building programs have demonstrated modest effectiveness. Furthermore, resilience training has been shown to have a small to moderate effect on improving resilience and other mental health outcomes across diverse adult populations and persons with chronic diseases. On the other hand, mental toughness training methods, often utilized in sports, focus on developing a person's ability to persevere through challenges and maintain performance under pressure. These methods have been associated with fewer mental health complaints and have been suggested as a stress resilience resource among university students. Mental toughness training in sports has shown a large effect in developing mental toughness among athletes, and it has been found to mitigate the relationship between stress and depressive symptoms in both adolescent and young adult populations. Additionally, mental toughness training can positively influence mental toughness through mechanisms such as self-compassion, which increases resilience and positive affect. However, the effectiveness of mental toughness training outside of sports and its comparison to resilience-building techniques in broader populations remains less clear. For instance, a study on police officers found limited practical relevance of a Mental Strength Training (MST) aimed at enhancing psychological resilience, with officers largely appraising the training benefits negatively. Similarly, a unique resilience-strengthening intervention based on self-reflection was found to be effective in preventing the onset of depression symptoms and promoting stable levels of perceived stress, indicating the potential for alternative approaches to resilience and mental toughness training. In summary, while both resilience-building techniques and mental toughness training methods aim to enhance psychological resilience, they employ different strategies and have been found to be effective in varying contexts. Resilience-building techniques, incorporating CBT and mindfulness, show moderate positive effects across diverse populations, including workplace settings. In contrast, mental toughness training, often focused on sports, demonstrates significant benefits in stress resilience and mental health outcomes, with its applicability and effectiveness in broader populations requiring further exploration.What are specific gender risk factors that contribute to severe covid19?

Gender-specific risk factors contributing to severe COVID-19 include differences in hyper-inflammatory conditions (HICs) such as macrophage activation, hematological dysfunction, cytokinaemia, coagulopathy, and liver inflammation, with males showing higher elevation in markers like serum ferritin and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio. Additionally, males have been found to have a higher risk of death, intubation, and ICU care due to COVID-19 compared to females, with interactions between hypoxia and obesity affecting outcomes differently between the genders. Despite early assumptions of males being more impacted, recent data suggests a more disproportionately severe impact of COVID-19 on females, indicating a need for further investigation into country-specific factors contributing to this differential impact.How does can affect the academic mental health of student?

Academic stress significantly impacts the mental health of college students. Factors such as high self-positioning, pressure from various aspects, and improper handling of psychological problems contribute to mental health issues among students. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated mental health problems among university students, with stress, anxiety, and depression being prevalent. Medical students, in particular, frequently experience mental health issues like stress and burnout, affecting their academic achievement and professionalism. Understanding these factors, including personal traits, social support, and environmental influences, is crucial in providing necessary support to students. Implementing comprehensive mental health support systems that address personal and environmental factors, along with proactive approaches focusing on self-care and systemic burdens, is essential for enhancing students' mental well-being and academic success.How has the prevalence of obesity affected the outcomes of COVID-19 patients?

Obesity has been shown to impact the outcomes of COVID-19 patients significantly. Studies have indicated that obese patients with COVID-19 are more likely to require intensive care treatment and have a higher risk of mortality compared to non-obese individuals. While some research suggests that obesity does not increase the odds of mortality in certain BMI classes, severe obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) is associated with a higher risk of death and the need for mechanical ventilation. Additionally, abdominal obesity, as indicated by waist circumference, has been linked to a more severe course of COVID-19 infection and an increased risk of death. These findings emphasize the importance of considering obesity as a critical independent prognostic factor in the management and care of COVID-19 patients.Canada working poor cause

The working poor in Canada face various challenges leading to their situation. Factors contributing to working poverty include high rates of post-secondary education, full-time employment, immigration status, being a single-earner (e.g., unattached individual, lone-parent family, single-earning household), and self-employment. Additionally, family situations play a significant role, with about one-fifth to one-third of the working poor experiencing poverty due to their family circumstances. Child poverty in Canada is a pressing issue, with over 1.3 million children living in poverty, attributed to high unemployment, inadequate social policies, and low wages. Furthermore, globalization and economic transformations since the 1980s have polarized the job market, leaving less-qualified individuals in low-paying jobs, contributing to the rise of poverty in specific groups like the elderly, ethnic minorities, and children.How many businesses are affected by customer online disinhibition behavior?

Customer online disinhibition behavior affects a significant number of businesses due to the phenomenon where individuals feel less restrained in online environments, leading to increased self-disclosure and intense interactions compared to face-to-face interactions. This behavior is part of the Online Disinhibition Effect (ODE), which manifests differently in various online mediums, including online video games where it can have both positive and negative impacts. Factors contributing to ODE include dissociative anonymity, invisibility, asynchronicity, solipsistic introjection, dissociative imagination, and minimization of authority, all of which influence the extent of disinhibition in online interactions. Businesses across different sectors need to be aware of and manage the implications of customer online disinhibition behavior to maintain positive customer relationships and ensure a conducive online environment for all users.How do these self-efficacy issues impact the academic performance of English language learners in mathematics?

Self-efficacy plays a crucial role in the academic performance of English language learners (ELs) in mathematics. Research indicates that teachers' self-efficacy in supporting ELs positively impacts their mathematical learning. Additionally, students' self-efficacy influences their academic performance in mathematics. However, when it comes to instructional practices, teachers tend to adjust their clarity of instruction based on the percentage of ELs in their classrooms, potentially affecting ELs' learning outcomes. Moreover, students' mathematics self-efficacy levels and anxiety levels are inversely related, with higher self-efficacy and lower anxiety correlating with better academic performance. Therefore, addressing self-efficacy issues among both teachers and students is crucial for enhancing the academic performance of ELs in mathematics.What role does the framework proposed by Chen and Wang (2018) play in promoting open discussion in FGDs?

The framework proposed by Chen and Wang (2018) plays a crucial role in promoting open discussion in Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). Open-minded discussion is essential in FGDs, and the proposed theoretical framework draws on cooperation and competition theory to enhance the quality of dialogue within these group settings. Additionally, the critical dialectical pluralist FGD approach introduced by Onwuegbuzie and Frels empowers participants to make decisions at every stage of the research process, promoting inclusivity and participant-directed discussions. Furthermore, the Open Dialogue approach, as discussed by Skourteli et al., emphasizes the importance of dialogue and inclusion of social networks in mental health services, fostering open discussions among professionals and team members to address challenges and promote growth. These frameworks collectively contribute to creating environments conducive to open and meaningful discussions in FGDs.