scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Antecedent (grammar)

About: Antecedent (grammar) is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 1392 publications have been published within this topic receiving 41824 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal Article
TL;DR: Whether indirect evidence leveraged from a broader input set could lead children to the correct knowledge for anaphoric one is considered, and whether it is domain-specific or domain- general, and how this impacts the larger debate about Universal Grammar is discussed.

10 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Hiroshi Nagata1
TL;DR: The authors examined the temporal course of the activation of an antecedent triggered by a reflexive, jibun, in syntactically ambiguous sentences in Japanese and found that the response times were faster when the probe was for subject (S-probe) than when it was for indirect object (IO)-probe irrespective of the probe position.
Abstract: Three experiments examined the temporal course of the activation of an antecedent triggered by a reflexive,jibun, in syntactically ambiguous sentences in Japanese. Twenty-two students in Experiment 1 were tested for sentences where a subject word occupied the first position and an indirect object word the second, with the probe given for each word either immediately after the reflexive or at the end of the sentence. Reaction times (RTs) were faster when the probe was for subject (S-probe) than when it was for indirect object (IO-probe) irrespective of the probe position. Experiment 2 tested 22 students to determine the effect of order of mention of participant on the probe recognition time. RTs were faster for the S-probe than for the IO-probe, although the difference between the two probes was smaller when the probe was given immediately after the reflexive. Experiment 3 tested 22 students to examine the effect of context on an activation pattern. RTs were lower for the S-probe than for the IO-probe, though no difference was found between them for the probe given at the end of the sentence. Findings were interpreted as supporting the single-interpretation model for on-line analysis of syntactically ambiguous sentences and also the immediate-activation model in an assignment of the reflexive to its antecedent.

10 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Anaphora is defined by Lust as the relationship between a "proform," called anaphor, and another term called an "antecedent" or "coreferent" (e.g., "John", "the little girl", or "the old books").
Abstract: In the most basic sense, comprehension requires the integration of successive discourse elements within a text into a coherent conceptual representation. Garrod and Sanford note that integrating textual information accurately involves "appreciating relationships between various objects, people, or events mentioned in the text" (77). Discourse features that clarify or obscure such relationships within texts must be interpreted correctly if comprehension is to be successful. One such discourse feature is anaphora, a common referencing device employed in both spoken and written texts. Anaphora is technically defined by Lust as the relationship between a "proform," called an "anaphor" (e.g., "he," "she," or "they"), and another term called an "antecedent" or "coreferent" (e.g., "John," "the little girl," or "the old books"). Lust states that "the interpretation of the anaphor is in some way determined by the interpretation of the antecedent" (9). In other words, anaphoric forms are coreferential; they make reference to something else for their interpretation and can not be interpreted semantically in their own right (Halliday and Hasan). Bloom and Hays claim that in addition to being coreferential, anaphora also allows authors to employ semantic variation when referencing previously introduced concepts within a discourse. For example, in the sentence "John came home late and he was very tired," the author uses "he" as an anaphoric alternative for "John." In German, anaphoric structures serve essentially the same reference variation function as they do in English, as Drosdowski demonstrates:

10 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed the effect of entrepreneurial orientation on learning orientation (LO), the relationship between them and their effect on organisational learning (OL) and innovation performance in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
Abstract: This paper analyses the effect of entrepreneurial orientation (EO) on learning orientation (LO), the relationship between them and their effect on organisational learning (OL) and innovation performance (IP) in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). A cross-sectional research design, drawing on a questionnaire survey, was employed to collect data from a sample of Iranian SMEs. The results obtained from structural equation modelling analyses revealed that EO positively affects the LO and OL levels in SMEs. In addition, OL was found to be a significant antecedent of innovation performance. These findings have important implications for academies, practitioners, and economic policy makers.

10 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 1996
TL;DR: This chapter describes the representations formed before movements are carried out and that are vital for the successful realization of the actor's intentions, called plans or motor programs.
Abstract: Publisher Summary In seeking to understand the control of motor behavior, it is natural to inquire into the antecedents of action. This chapter describes the representations formed before movements are carried out and that are vital for the successful realization of the actor's intentions. Such representations have been called “plans” or “motor programs.” The chapter discusses discrete movements involving more than one mechanical degree of freedom. The chapter discusses the entire series of motor acts involving many degrees of freedom. It also considers those factors that can be taken to suggest antecedent representations and that seem not to admit of purely physical determinations of action selection or control.

10 citations


Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20222
202159
202052
201957
201863
201762