scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Beam (structure)

About: Beam (structure) is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 155735 publications have been published within this topic receiving 1420731 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a theory explaining the origin of ripple topography is presented, which shows that the ripple wave vector is parallel to the surface component of the beam direction, provided that longitudinal straggling of the beacon is not too large.
Abstract: When an amorphous solid is etched by an off‐normal incidence ion beam, a ripple topography often results. A theory explaining the origin of these waves is presented. For incidence angles close to the normal, we find that the ripple wave vector is parallel to the surface component of the beam direction, provided that longitudinal straggling of the beam is not too large. The ripple orientation is rotated by 90° when the beam is close to grazing incidence. The wavelength given by the theory varies as λ∼( f T)−1/2 exp(−ΔE/2kBT) for high temperatures T and low fluxes f, where ΔE is the activation energy for surface self‐diffusion. The predicted magnitude of the wavelength is in reasonable accord with experiments in this regime.

1,179 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the theoretical foundation of the Bessel beam is described and various experiments that make use of Bessel beams are discussed: these cover a wide range of fields including non-linear optics, where the intense central core of the bessel beam has attracted interest; short pulse non-diffracting fields; atom optics, and optical manipulation where the reconstruction properties of the beam enable new effects to be observed that cannot be seen with Gaussian beams.
Abstract: Diffraction is a cornerstone of optical physics and has implications for the design of all optical systems. The paper discusses the so-called 'non-diffracting' light field, commonly known as the Bessel beam. Approximations to such beams can be experimentally realized using a range of different means. The theoretical foundation of these beams is described and then various experiments that make use of Bessel beams are discussed: these cover a wide range of fields including non-linear optics, where the intense central core of the Bessel beam has attracted interest; short pulse non-diffracting fields; atom optics, where the narrow non-diffracting features of the Bessel beam are able to act as atomic guides and atomic confinement devices and optical manipulation, where the reconstruction properties of the beam enable new effects to be observed that cannot be seen with Gaussian beams. The intensity profile of the Bessel beam may offer routes to investigating statistical physics as well as new techniques for the...

1,173 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Nov 1956
TL;DR: In this paper, the superposition of two coherent beams in different states of elliptic polarisation is discussed in a general manner, and the extent of mutual interference varies from a maximum for identically polarised beams (c = 0) to zero for oppositely polarised ones (C = π ).
Abstract: The superposition of two coherent beams in different states of elliptic polarisation is discussed in a general manner. If A and B represent the states of polarisation of the given beams on the Poincare sphere, and C that of the resultant beam, the result is simply expressed in terms of the sides,a, b, c of the spherical triangle ABC. The intensity I of the resultant beam is given by: I=I1 + I2 +2√I1+I2cos½Ccosδ; the extent of mutual interference thus varies from a maximum for identically polarised beams (c = 0), to zero for oppositely polarised beams (c = π ). The state of polarisation C of the resultant beam is located by sin2 ½a = (I1/I) sin2 ½c and sin2 ½b = (I2/I) sin2 ½c. The 'phase difference' δ is equal to the supplement of half the area of the triangle C'BA (where C' is the point diametrically opposite to C). These results also apply to the converse problem of the decomposition of a polarised beam into two others. The interference of two coherent beams after resolution into the same state of elliptic polarisation by an elliptic analyser or compensator is discussed; as also the interference (direct,and after resolution by an analyser) of n coherent pencils in different states of polarisation.

1,142 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Peter A. R. Ade1, Nabila Aghanim2, C. Armitage-Caplan3, Monique Arnaud4  +273 moreInstitutions (59)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors characterized the effective beams, the effective beam window functions and the associated errors for the Planck High Frequency Instrument (HFI) detectors, including the effect of the optics, detectors, data processing and the scan strategy.
Abstract: This paper characterizes the effective beams, the effective beam window functions and the associated errors for the Planck High Frequency Instrument (HFI) detectors. The effective beam is the angular response including the effect of the optics, detectors, data processing and the scan strategy. The window function is the representation of this beam in the harmonic domain which is required to recover an unbiased measurement of the cosmic microwave background angular power spectrum. The HFI is a scanning instrument and its effective beams are the convolution of: a) the optical response of the telescope and feeds; b) the processing of the time-ordered data and deconvolution of the bolometric and electronic transfer function; and c) the merging of several surveys to produce maps. The time response transfer functions are measured using observations of Jupiter and Saturn and by minimizing survey difference residuals. The scanning beam is the post-deconvolution angular response of the instrument, and is characterized with observations of Mars. The main beam solid angles are determined to better than 0.5% at each HFI frequency band. Observations of Jupiter and Saturn limit near sidelobes (within 5 degrees) to about 0.1% of the total solid angle. Time response residuals remain as long tails in the scanning beams, but contribute less than 0.1% of the total solid angle. The bias and uncertainty in the beam products are estimated using ensembles of simulated planet observations that include the impact of instrumental noise and known systematic effects. The correlation structure of these ensembles is well-described by five errors eigenmodes that are sub-dominant to sample variance and instrumental noise in the harmonic domain. A suite of consistency tests provide confidence that the error model represents a sufficient description of the data. The total error in the effective beam window functions is below 1% at 100 GHz up to multiple l similar to 1500, below 0.5% at 143 and 217 GHz up to l similar to 2000.

1,124 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Monte Carlo method
95.9K papers, 2.1M citations
80% related
Scattering
152.3K papers, 3M citations
80% related
Nonlinear system
208.1K papers, 4M citations
80% related
Laser
353.1K papers, 4.3M citations
79% related
Finite element method
178.6K papers, 3M citations
78% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20233,627
20227,401
20214,262
20205,823
20196,661
20186,581