scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Betweenness centrality

About: Betweenness centrality is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 4114 publications have been published within this topic receiving 147091 citations.


Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
20 Aug 2006
TL;DR: The best performing methods are the ones based on random-walks and "forest fire"; they match very accurately both static as well as evolutionary graph patterns, with sample sizes down to about 15% of the original graph.
Abstract: Given a huge real graph, how can we derive a representative sample? There are many known algorithms to compute interesting measures (shortest paths, centrality, betweenness, etc.), but several of them become impractical for large graphs. Thus graph sampling is essential.The natural questions to ask are (a) which sampling method to use, (b) how small can the sample size be, and (c) how to scale up the measurements of the sample (e.g., the diameter), to get estimates for the large graph. The deeper, underlying question is subtle: how do we measure success?.We answer the above questions, and test our answers by thorough experiments on several, diverse datasets, spanning thousands nodes and edges. We consider several sampling methods, propose novel methods to check the goodness of sampling, and develop a set of scaling laws that describe relations between the properties of the original and the sample.In addition to the theoretical contributions, the practical conclusions from our work are: Sampling strategies based on edge selection do not perform well; simple uniform random node selection performs surprisingly well. Overall, best performing methods are the ones based on random-walks and "forest fire"; they match very accurately both static as well as evolutionary graph patterns, with sample sizes down to about 15% of the original graph.

1,290 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is conjecture that the load exponent is a universal quantity to characterize scale-free networks and valid for both undirected and directed cases.
Abstract: We study a problem of data packet transport in scale-free networks whose degree distribution follows a power law with the exponent $\ensuremath{\gamma}$. Load, or ``betweenness centrality,'' of a vertex is the accumulated total number of data packets passing through that vertex when every pair of vertices sends and receives a data packet along the shortest path connecting the pair. It is found that the load distribution follows a power law with the exponent $\ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\approx}2.2(1)$, insensitive to different values of $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ in the range, $2l\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\le}3$, and different mean degrees, which is valid for both undirected and directed cases. Thus, we conjecture that the load exponent is a universal quantity to characterize scale-free networks.

1,133 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Eigenvectors, and the related centrality measure Bonacich's c(β), have advantages over graph-theoretic measures like degree, betweenness, and closeness centrality: they can be used in signed and valued graphs and the beta parameter in c( β) permits the calculation of power measures for a wider variety of types of exchange.

1,122 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A new centrality measure that characterizes the participation of each node in all subgraphs in a network, C(S)(i), which is better able to discriminate the nodes of a network than alternate measures such as degree, closeness, betweenness, and eigenvector centralities.
Abstract: We introduce a new centrality measure that characterizes the participation of each node in all subgraphs in a network. Smaller subgraphs are given more weight than larger ones, which makes this measure appropriate for characterizing network motifs. We show that the subgraph centrality [C(S)(i)] can be obtained mathematically from the spectra of the adjacency matrix of the network. This measure is better able to discriminate the nodes of a network than alternate measures such as degree, closeness, betweenness, and eigenvector centralities. We study eight real-world networks for which C(S)(i) displays useful and desirable properties, such as clear ranking of nodes and scale-free characteristics. Compared with the number of links per node, the ranking introduced by C(S)(i) (for the nodes in the protein interaction network of S. cereviciae) is more highly correlated with the lethality of individual proteins removed from the proteome.

1,102 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
17 Oct 2007-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: This study presents an approach to the identification and classification of putative hub regions in brain networks on the basis of multiple network attributes and charts potential links between the structural embedding of such regions and their functional roles.
Abstract: Brain regions in the mammalian cerebral cortex are linked by a complex network of fiber bundles. These inter-regional networks have previously been analyzed in terms of their node degree, structural motif, path length and clustering coefficient distributions. In this paper we focus on the identification and classification of hub regions, which are thought to play pivotal roles in the coordination of information flow. We identify hubs and characterize their network contributions by examining motif fingerprints and centrality indices for all regions within the cerebral cortices of both the cat and the macaque. Motif fingerprints capture the statistics of local connection patterns, while measures of centrality identify regions that lie on many of the shortest paths between parts of the network. Within both cat and macaque networks, we find that a combination of degree, motif participation, betweenness centrality and closeness centrality allows for reliable identification of hub regions, many of which have previously been functionally classified as polysensory or multimodal. We then classify hubs as either provincial (intra-cluster) hubs or connector (inter-cluster) hubs, and proceed to show that lesioning hubs of each type from the network produces opposite effects on the small-world index. Our study presents an approach to the identification and classification of putative hub regions in brain networks on the basis of multiple network attributes and charts potential links between the structural embedding of such regions and their functional roles.

1,094 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Cluster analysis
146.5K papers, 2.9M citations
80% related
Node (networking)
158.3K papers, 1.7M citations
80% related
The Internet
213.2K papers, 3.8M citations
77% related
Optimization problem
96.4K papers, 2.1M citations
76% related
Empirical research
51.3K papers, 1.9M citations
75% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023345
2022698
2021277
2020313
2019338
2018317