Bioaerosol

About: Bioaerosol is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 1347 publications have been published within this topic receiving 34791 citations.

Bacteria and fungi inactivation by photocatalysis under UVA irradiation: liquid and gas phase

Abstract: In the last decade, environmental risks associated with wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have become a concern in the scientific community due to the absence of specific legislation governing the occupational exposure limits (OEL) for microorganisms present in indoor air. Thus, it is necessary to develop techniques to effectively inactivate microorganisms present in the air of WWTPs facilities. In the present work, ultraviolet light A radiation was used as inactivation tool. The microbial population was not visibly reduced in the bioaerosol by ultraviolet light A (UVA) photolysis. The UVA photocatalytic process for the inactivation of microorganisms (bacteria and fungi, ATCC strains and isolates from indoor air samples of a WWTP) using titanium dioxide (TiO2 P25) and zinc oxide (ZnO) was tested in both liquid-phase and airborne conditions. In the slurry conditions at liquid phase, P25 showed a better performance in inactivation. For this reason, gas-phase assays were performed in a tubular photoreactor packed with cellulose acetate monolithic structures coated with P25. The survival rate of microorganisms under study decreased with the catalyst load and the UVA exposure time. Inactivation of fungi was slower than resistant bacteria, followed by Gram-positive bacteria and Gram-negative bacteria. Graphical abstract Inactivation of fungi and bacteria in gas phase by photocatalitic process performed in a tubular photoreactor packed with cellulose acetate monolith structures coated with TiO2.

Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.

Abstract: Bioaerosol studies aim to describe the microbial content and increase understanding of the aerosolization processes linked to diseases. Air samplers are used to collect, identify, and quantify bioaerosols. Studies comparing the performances of air samplers have typically used a culture approach or have targeted a specific microorganism in laboratory settings. The objective of this study was to use environmental field samples to compare the efficiencies of 3 high-airflow-rate samplers for describing bioaerosol diversity using a next-generation sequencing approach. Two liquid cyclonic impactors and one electrostatic filter dry sampler were used in four wastewater treatment plants to target bacterial diversity and in five dairy farms to target fungal diversity. The dry electrostatic sampler was consistently more powerful in collecting more fungal and bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Substantial differences in OTU abundances between liquid and dry sampling were revealed. The majority of the diversity revealed by dry electrostatic sampling was not identified using the cyclonic liquid impactors. The findings from this work suggest that the choice of a bioaerosol sampler should include information about the efficiency and ability of samplers to cover microbial diversity. Although these results suggest that electrostatic filters result in better coverage of the microbial diversity among the tested air samplers, further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. While it is difficult to determine a single universally optimal air sampler, this work provides an in-depth look at some of the considerations that are essential when choosing an air sampler for studying the microbial ecology of bioaerosols.IMPORTANCE Associating bioaerosol exposure and health problems is challenging, and adequate exposure monitoring is a priority for scientists in the field. Conclusions that can be drawn from bioaerosol exposure studies are highly dependent on the design of the study and the methodologies used. The air sampling strategy is the first methodological step leading to an accurate interpretation of what is present in the air. Applying new molecular approaches to evaluate the efficiencies of the different types of samplers used in the field is necessary in order to circumvent traditional approaches and the biases they introduce to such studies. The results and conclusions provided in this paper should be taken in consideration when conducting a bioaerosol study.

Sampling for Airborne Microorganisms

Abstract: Microbiologists have confronted the challenges of sampling and analysis of airborne microorganisms since the early 20th century. Today, the concentration and composition of airborne microorganisms are of interest in various areas such as agricultural and industrial settings, hospitals, home and office environments, and military installations. In all of these applications, the term "bioaerosol" is used to refer to airborne biological particles, such as bacterial cells, fungal spores, viruses, and pollen grains, and to their fragments and by-products. A wide variety of bioaerosol sampling and analysis methods have been used, and new methods are being developed. However, no single sampling method is suitable for the collection and analysis of all types of bioaerosols and no standardized protocols are currently available. Therefore, data from different studies are often difficult to compare because of differences in sampler designs, collection times, airflow rates, collection media and analysis methods. In addition, human exposure limits have not been established for bioaerosols because of the lack of exposure, dose, and response data. The purpose of this chapter is to present various bioaerosol sampling and analysis methods that would allow facilitating an intelligent selection of instrumentation and techniques. The principles of bioaerosol sampling are presented, followed by a review of traditional and emerging sampling methods and techniques, including the results of performance evaluations of the various sampler types. Equipment calibration and air sampling considerations such as collection times and the number of samples are discussed. The advantages and disadvantages of surface sampling methods are also described.

Monitoring viable fungal and bacterial bioaerosol concentrations to identify acceptable levels for common indoor environments

Abstract: Little characterization of bioaerosol concentrations between 200 and 450 cfu.m-3 has been carried out to address potential concerns about indoor air quality. The present research describes measurements of indoor bioaerosol concentrations and concludes that a level of nontoxigenic and nonpathogenic organisms ≤ 300 cfu·m -3 should be typical for environments in which nor mal, nonimmunocompromised people live. With the exception of Cladospo rium, no organism should individually contribute more than 50 cfu·m-3 to the total. The author believes that levels >300 cfu·m-3 and/or not meeting the above criteria require further investigation for: a bias from prominent outdoor bioaerosol(s), inadequate air filtration, excessive indoor humidity and micro- humidity environments, and/or potential indigenous contamination source(s). This is not to say that a level of contamination > 300 cfu·m-3 represents any threshold having medical or health significance nor necessarily that it is repre sentative of an unacceptable ind...

On the interpretation of bioaerosol exposure measurements and impacts on health

Abstract: Bioaerosols are recognized as one of the main transmission routes for infectious diseases and are responsible for other various types of health effects through inhalation and potential ingestion. Associating exposure with bioaerosol and health problems is challenging, and adequate exposure monitoring is a top priority for aerosol scientists. The multiple factors affecting bioaerosol content, the variability in the focus of each bioaerosol exposure study, and the variations in experimental design and the standardization of methods make bioaerosol exposure studies very difficult. Therefore, the health impacts of bioaerosol exposure are still poorly understood. This paper presents a brief description of a state-of-the-art development in bioaerosol exposure studies supported by studies on several related subjects. The main objective of this paper is to propose new considerations for bioaerosol exposure guidelines and the development of tools and study designs to better interpret bioaerosol data. The principal observations and findings are the discrepancy of the applicable methods in bioaerosol studies that makes result comparison impossible. Furthermore, the silo mentality helps in creating a bigger gap in the knowledge accumulated about bioaerosol exposure. Innovative and original ideas are presented for aerosol scientists and health scientists to consider and discuss. Although many examples cited herein are from occupational exposure, the discussion has relevance to any human environment. This work gives concrete suggestions for how to design a full bioaerosol study that includes all of the key elements necessary to help understand the real impacts of bioaerosol exposure in the short term. The creation of the proposed bioaerosol public database could give crucial information to control the public health. Implications: How can we move toward a bioaerosol exposure guidelines? The creation of the bioaerosol public database will help accumulate information for long-term association studies and help determine specific exposure biomarkers to bioaerosols. The implementation of such work will lead to a deeper understanding and more efficient utilization of bioaerosol studies to prevent public health hazards.