scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Biofilm

About: Biofilm is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 23010 publications have been published within this topic receiving 906812 citations. The topic is also known as: biofilms.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Minimal biofilm eradication concentrations, derived by using the Calgary Biofilm Device, demonstrated that for biofilms of the same organisms, 100 to 1,000 times the concentration of a certain antibiotic were often required for the antibiotic to be effective, while other antibiotics were found to beeffective at the MICs.
Abstract: Determination of the MIC, based on the activities of antibiotics against planktonic bacteria, is the standard assay for antibiotic susceptibility testing. Adherent bacterial populations (biofilms) present with an innate lack of antibiotic susceptibility not seen in the same bacteria grown as planktonic populations. The Calgary Biofilm Device (CBD) is described as a new technology for the rapid and reproducible assay of biofilm susceptibilities to antibiotics. The CBD produces 96 equivalent biofilms for the assay of antibiotic susceptibilities by the standard 96-well technology. Biofilm formation was followed by quantitative microbiology and scanning electron microscopy. Susceptibility to a standard group of antibiotics was determined for National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) reference strains: Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213. Growth curves demonstrated that biofilms of a predetermined size could be formed on the CBD at specific time points and, furthermore, that no significant difference (P > 0.1) was seen between biofilms formed on each of the 96 pegs. The antibiotic susceptibilities for planktonic populations obtained by the NCCLS method or from the CBD were similar. Minimal biofilm eradication concentrations, derived by using the CBD, demonstrated that for biofilms of the same organisms, 100 to 1,000 times the concentration of a certain antibiotic were often required for the antibiotic to be effective, while other antibiotics were found to be effective at the MICs. The CBD offers a new technology for the rational selection of antibiotics effective against microbial biofilms and for the screening of new effective antibiotic compounds.

1,880 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Kim Lewis1
TL;DR: The nature of bacterial biofilm resistance to antimicrobials is the subject of the present minireview and describes an increased resistance of cells to killing.
Abstract: A biofilm is a population of cells growing on a surface and enclosed in an exopolysaccharide matrix. Biofilms are notoriously difficult to eradicate and are a source of many recalcitrant infections. The nature of bacterial biofilm resistance to antimicrobials is the subject of the present minireview. Pathogenic yeast such as Candida albicans also form recalcitrant biofilms, and this topic has recently been reviewed (5). Resistance is an ability of a microorganism to grow in the presence of an elevated level of an antimicrobial. In short, a strain for which the MIC is increased is resistant. By this conventional criterion, biofilm cells do not necessarily show increased resistance. With some exceptions, biofilm cells do not grow better than planktonic cells in the presence of a broad range of antimicrobials. This is evident from examination of susceptibility data in the biofilm literature (33). However, in most biofilm susceptibility studies, only survival of cells in a preformed biofilm rather than the ability of a biofilm to grow is recorded. Accordingly, the reported “resistance” describes an increased resistance of cells to killing. This is indeed what biofilms are good at: they are not easily eradicated by cidal antimicrobials. The ability of antimicrobials to inhibit biofilm growth indicates that they are able to diffuse through the biofilm and act normally against their targets. Why, then, do biofilm cells not die? This is the crux of the problem and the riddle that needs to be solved.

1,830 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The extracellular matrix is a complex and extremely important component of all biofilms, providing architectural structure and mechanical stability to the attached population, and these intrinsic and extrinsic factors combine to produce a dynamic, heterogeneous microenvironment for the attached and enveloped cells.
Abstract: The extracellular matrix is a complex and extremely important component of all biofilms, providing architectural structure and mechanical stability to the attached population. The matrix is composed of cells, water and secreted/released extracellular macromolecules. In addition, a range of enzymic and regulatory activities can be found within the matrix. Together, these different components and activities are likely to interact and in so doing create a series of local environments within the matrix which co-exist as a functional consortium. The matrix architecture is also subject to a number of extrinsic factors, including fluctuations in nutrient and gaseous levels and fluid shear. Together, these intrinsic and extrinsic factors combine to produce a dynamic, heterogeneous microenvironment for the attached and enveloped cells.

1,810 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Current concepts of biofilm tolerance are reviewed with special emphasis on the role of the biofilm matrix and the physiology ofBiofilm-embedded cells, and the heterogeneity in metabolic and reproductive activity within a biofilm correlates with a non-uniform susceptibility of enclosed bacteria.

1,730 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Wimpenny & Colasanti (1997) have suggested that biofilm structure is largely determined by the concentration of substrate, and postulated that such differences also validate at least three conceptual models of biofilms – heterogeneous mosaics, structures penetrated by water channels, and dense confluent bioFilms.
Abstract: Biofilms probably comprise the normal environment for most microbial cells in many natural and artificial habitats, and as such are complex associations of cells, extracellular products and detritus either trapped within the biofilm or released from cells which have lysed as the biofilm ages (Christensen, 1989). The main ‘cement ’ for all these cells and products is the mixture of polysaccharides secreted by the cells established within the biofilm. Probably the nearest analogy is processed food, in which a mixture of macromolecules of all types interact in variousways to form a recognizable structure. Within such a structure, cells, water, ions and soluble low-and high-molecular-mass products are trapped. In many biofilms, as in food, the hydrated polysaccharides may be in a semi-solid state. The major component in the biofilm matrix is water – up to 97% (Zhang et al., 1998), and the characteristics of the solvent are determined by the solutes dissolved in it. The exact structure of any biofilm is probably a unique feature of the environment in which it develops. As pointed out by Stoodley et al. (1999a), nutritional and physical conditions greatly affect the nature of laboratory biofilms and this is equally true for other types. Wimpenny & Colasanti (1997) have also suggested that biofilm structure is largely determined by the concentration of substrate. They further postulated that such differences also validate at least three conceptual models of biofilms – heterogeneous mosaics, structures penetrated by water channels, and dense confluent biofilms.

1,702 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Escherichia coli
59K papers, 2M citations
86% related
Antimicrobial
45.4K papers, 1M citations
84% related
Virulence
35.9K papers, 1.3M citations
83% related
Hydrogen peroxide
42.5K papers, 1M citations
82% related
Plasmid
44.3K papers, 1.9M citations
82% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20241
20233,430
20226,827
20212,025
20202,079
20191,885