Topic
Capecitabine
About: Capecitabine is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 6191 publications have been published within this topic receiving 153845 citations. The topic is also known as: Ro-09-1978-000 & Ro-091978000.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: Lapatinib plus capecitabine is superior to cape citabine alone in women with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer that has progressed after treatment with regimens that included an anthracycline, a taxane, and trastuzumab.
Abstract: A b s t r ac t The interim analysis of time to progression met specified criteria for early reporting on the basis of superiority in the combination-therapy group. The hazard ratio for the independently assessed time to progression was 0.49 (95% confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.71; P<0.001), with 49 events in the combination-therapy group and 72 events in the monotherapy group. The median time to progression was 8.4 months in the combination-therapy group as compared with 4.4 months in the monotherapy group. This improvement was achieved without an increase in serious toxic effects or symptomatic cardiac events. Conclusions Lapatinib plus capecitabine is superior to capecitabine alone in women with HER2- positive advanced breast cancer that has progressed after treatment with regimens that included an anthracycline, a taxane, and trastuzumab. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00078572.)
3,149 citations
TL;DR: The addition of bevacizumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly improved PFS in this first-line trial in patients with MCRC.
Abstract: Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab when added to first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (either capecitabine plus oxaliplatin [XELOX] or fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin [FOLFOX-4]) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).
2,767 citations
TL;DR: Capecitabine and oxaliplatin are as effective as fluorouracil and cisplatin, respectively, in patients with previously untreated esophagogastric cancer, in a two-by-two design.
Abstract: For the capecitabine–fluorouracil comparison, the hazard ratio for death in the capecitabine group was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 0.99); for the oxaliplatin–cisplatin comparison, the hazard ratio for the oxaliplatin group was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.80 to 1.10). The upper limit of the confidence intervals for both hazard ratios excluded the predefined noninferiority margin of 1.23. Median survival times in the ECF, ECX, EOF, and EOX groups were 9.9 months, 9.9 months, 9.3 months, and 11.2 months, respectively; survival rates at 1 year were 37.7%, 40.8%, 40.4%, and 46.8%, respectively. In the secondary analysis, overall survival was longer with EOX than with ECF, with a hazard ratio for death of 0.80 in the EOX group (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.97; P = 0.02). Progression-free survival and response rates did not differ significantly among the regimens. Toxic effects of capecitabine and fluorouracil were similar. As compared with cisplatin, oxaliplatin was associated with lower incidences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, alopecia, renal toxicity, and thromboembolism but with slightly higher incidences of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea and neuropathy. Conclusions Capecitabine and oxaliplatin are as effective as fluorouracil and cisplatin, respectively, in patients with previously untreated esophagogastric cancer. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN51678883.)
1,987 citations
TL;DR: Among patients with HER2‐negative metastatic breast cancer and a germline BRCA mutation, Olaparib monotherapy provided a significant benefit over standard therapy; median progression‐free survival was 2.8 months longer and the risk of disease progression or death was 42% lower with olaparIB monotherapy than with standard therapy.
Abstract: BackgroundOlaparib is an oral poly(adenosine diphosphate–ribose) polymerase inhibitor that has promising antitumor activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer and a germline BRCA mutation. MethodsWe conducted a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial in which olaparib monotherapy was compared with standard therapy in patients with a germline BRCA mutation and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)–negative metastatic breast cancer who had received no more than two previous chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily) or standard therapy with single-agent chemotherapy of the physician’s choice (capecitabine, eribulin, or vinorelbine in 21-day cycles). The primary end point was progression-free survival, which was assessed by blinded independent central review and was analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. ResultsOf the 302 patients who underwent randomization, 205 were assigned to receive...
1,927 citations
Royal Liverpool University Hospital1, University of Liverpool2, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust3, University of Manchester4, Manchester Royal Infirmary5, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust6, Weston Park Hospital7, Royal Free Hospital8, St James's University Hospital9, Karolinska Institutet10, Uppsala University11, University of Hamburg12, Royal Surrey County Hospital13, Guy's Hospital14, Hammersmith Hospital15, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre16, Cardiff University17, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham18, Churchill Hospital19, Derriford Hospital20, University Hospital Coventry21, Heidelberg University22
TL;DR: The adjuvant combination of gem citabine and capecitabine should be the new standard of care following resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
1,378 citations