Topic
Cataloging
About: Cataloging is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 4770 publications have been published within this topic receiving 32489 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: This paper demonstrates the benefits of the MARC formats, the importance of the integration of information resources, and the guarantee of public access as the major reasons for using the traditional cataloguing approach to organise Internet resources.
Abstract: Many approaches have been taken by different groups to collect, organise, archive, disseminate and preserve electronic resources on Internet. Some projects, such as WebCrawler, Lycos, etc., purport to index or organise the electronic resources automatically. Another approach, led by the Clearinghouse for Subject‐Oriented Internet Resource Guides, involves human intelligence to identify and compile Internet resources by subjects for public access. The third category is the traditional library cataloguing approach. This paper demonstrates the benefits of the MARC formats, the importance of the integration of information resources, and the guarantee of public access as the major reasons for using the traditional cataloguing approach to organise Internet resources. Since cataloguing the Internet is a huge project, and various groups are involved in this process, the roles of each related group are discussed.
26 citations
••
TL;DR: The Claremont University Consortium's libraries finds the tool to be a helpful overlay of user‐generated tags and suggested readings based on tags over the current bibliographic information provided in the traditional library catalog.
Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to share the experience of implementing LibraryThing for Libraries (LTFL) at the Claremont University Consortium's libraries, the first US academic library to try LTFL.Design/methodology/approach – The objectives are to share CUC's experience with LTFL, sharing a list of pros and cons about the tool, implementation of the tool, experiences with the tool, and future steps planned by LTFL.Findings – Claremont University Consortium finds the tool to be a helpful overlay of user‐generated tags and suggested readings based on tags over the current bibliographic information provided in the traditional library catalog. Implementation of LTFL is easy, LTFL provides significant and immediate support, and is useful for finding items for research as well as for browsing.Originality/value – The paper is valuable for libraries considering LTFL as a catalog overlay, as well as for libraries interested in learning about next generation cataloging concepts.
26 citations
•
01 Jul 2002
TL;DR: This book presents a presentation of the research project and discusses different views on the process of Subject Cataloging, as well as suggesting personal approaches to subject cataloging.
Abstract: Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 Different Views on the Process of Subject Cataloging Chapter 3 Presentation of the Research Project Chapter 4 Twelve Personal Approaches to Subject Cataloging Chapter 5 Summarized Approach to Subject Cataloging Chapter 6 A Hypothetical Example of Subject Cataloging Chapter 7 Subject Cataloging: Application, Education, and the Future
26 citations
•
TL;DR: In reviewing the definition of quality at the Library of Congress, the relationship of quality cataloging to copy cataloging, minimal level Cataloging, the core bibliographic record, and outsourcing, the author concludes that the definition is dynamic and dependent on the values and needs of catalog users.
Abstract: The quality of cataloging is an issue that has engendered much discussion over decades of bibliographic control. Juxtaposed against the standard of full, accurate, and timely bibliographic records is the pressure to produce reliable access in a cost-effective manner. In reviewing the definition of quality at the Library of Congress (LC), the relationship of quality cataloging to copy cataloging, minimal level cataloging, the core bibliographic record, and outsourcing, the author concludes that the definition of quality is dynamic and dependent on the values and needs of catalog users.
26 citations