Topic
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale
About: Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 2308 publications have been published within this topic receiving 165219 citations. The topic is also known as: Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: The CES-D scale as discussed by the authors is a short self-report scale designed to measure depressive symptomatology in the general population, which has been used in household interview surveys and in psychiatric settings.
Abstract: The CES-D scale is a short self-report scale designed to measure depressive symptomatology in the general population. The items of the scale are symptoms associated with depression which have been used in previously validated longer scales. The new scale was tested in household interview surveys and in psychiatric settings. It was found to have very high internal consistency and adequate test- retest repeatability. Validity was established by pat terns of correlations with other self-report measures, by correlations with clinical ratings of depression, and by relationships with other variables which support its construct validity. Reliability, validity, and factor structure were similar across a wide variety of demographic characteristics in the general population samples tested. The scale should be a useful tool for epidemiologic studies of de pression.
48,339 citations
TL;DR: A short form of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), derived and tested for reliability and validity among a sample of well older adults in a large Health Maintenance Organization, showed good predictive accuracy when compared to the full-length 20-item version.
4,021 citations
TL;DR: The CES-D Scale is acceptable and reliable in all the groups studied, and the scores of the junior high school group may be inflated by an excess of transient symptoms and should be interpreted with caution, but the scale seems to be very suitable for the high school and older groups.
Abstract: The existence of depression in children and adolescents is well established, but debate remains about the phenomenology of the depressive syndrome in the young. In order to discover possible age differences in rates and etiology, the definition and measurement of depression must be comparable across the ages to be studied. A widely used self-report depression symptom scale, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale, was administered to convenient (and not necessarily representative) samples of high school and college students. The scores and patterns of responses to the 20 symptom items of the scale were compared with already existing data from junior high school students, from depressed patients, and from a representative community sample of adults and young adults. The results of the analyses suggest that the CES-D Scale is acceptable and reliable in all the groups studied. The scores of the junior high school group may be inflated by an excess of transient symptoms and should be interpreted with caution, but the scale seems to be very suitable for the high school and older groups.
1,821 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an approach for treatment planning and outcome assessment in mental health disorders, which is based on the QOLA Satisfaction and CKF Client Satisfaction.
Abstract: Contents: Preface. L.R. Derogatis, M. Fitzpatrick, The SCL-90-R, the Brief System Inventory(BSI), and the BSI-18. M. Maruish, Symptom Assessment--45 Questionnaire (SA-45). S.V. Eisen, S-L.T. Normand, A.J. Belanger, S. Gevorkian, E.A. Irvin, BASIS-32(R) and the Revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-R). L.A. Rescorla, T.M. Achenbach, The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) for Ages 18 to 90+ Years. D. Lachar, A. Espadas, S.E. Bailley, The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: Contemporary Applications. M.J. Lambert, A.T. Gregersen, G.M. Burlingame, The Outcome Questionnaire--45. S.R. Hahn, E. Sydney, K. Kroenke, J.B.W. Williams, R.L. Spitzer, Evaluation of Mental Disorders With the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders and Patient Health Questionnaire. T.L. Kramer, G.R. Smith, Major Depressive Disorder: Assessing the Spectrum of Symptoms and Functional Impairment at Treatment Entry and Follow-Up. P.J. Brantley, G.R. Dutton, K.B. Wood, The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and the Beck Depression Inventory--Primary Care (BDI-PC). K.A. Kobak, W.M. Reynolds, The Hamilton Depression Inventory. W.W. Eaton, C. Smith, M. Ybarra, C. Muntaner, A. Tien, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: Review and Revision (CESD and CESD-R). A.E. Hanson, F.R. Scogins, D.L. Welsh, J.M. Karpe, Geriatric Depression Scale. K.A. Wilson, D.L. Chambless, E. de Beurs, Beck Anxiety Inventory. C.D. Spielberger, E.C. Reheiser, A.E. Owen, S.J. Sydeman, Measuring the Psychological Vital Signs of Anxiety, Anger, Depression, and Curiosity in Treatment Planning and Outcomes Assessment. R.L. Greene, J.R. Clopton, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). S.E. Meagher, S.D. Grossman, T. Millon, Treatment Planning and Outcome Assessment in Adults: The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III). L.C. Morey, The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). I.B. Weiner, Rorschach Inkblot Method. J.N. Perry, J.N. Butcher, The Butcher Treatment Planning Inventory (BTPI): An Objective Guide to Treatment Planning. D.K. Snyder, A. Cepeda-Benito, B.V. Abbott, D.H. Gleaves, C. Negy, K. Hahlweg, J-P. Laurenceau, Cross-Cultural Applications of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory--Revised. L.R. Derogatis, L.E. Evision, Assessment of Sexual Function and Dysfunction via Psychological Instruments. G.R. Grissom, S. Sangsland, G. Jeager, T. Beers, PsyberCare-CD: An Outcomes Assessment and Clinical Decision Support System for Chemical Dependency Treatment. S.E. Krug, The Adult Personality Inventory. J.E. Ware, Jr., SF-36 Health Survey Update. J.R. Clopton, R.L. Greene, The Katz Adjustment Scales. M.B. Frisch, Use of the QOLI(R) or Quality of Life Inventory in Quality of Life Therapy and Assessment. C.C. Attkisson, T.K. Greenfield, The UCSF Client Satisfaction Scales: I. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8. T.K. Greenfield, C.C. Attkisson, The UCSF Client Satisfaction Scales: II. Service Satisfaction Scale-30. A.S. Daniels, J.A. Shaul, P. Greenberg, P.D. Cleary, The Experience of Care and Health Outcomes Survey (ECHO): A Consumer Survey to Collect Ratings of Behavioral Health Care Treatment, Outcomes, and Plans.
1,609 citations
TL;DR: There was no significant degradation in the ability of the CES-D to screen for depression among community-residing elderly adults, and the sample did not include participants with the more disabling forms of cognitive or functional impairment and physical illness.
Abstract: The efficacy of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as a screener for clinical depression was examined in a sample of 1,005 community-residing adults (age range = 50-96). Presence of a depressive disorder was determined by diagnostic interview. Analyses revealed that neither age, gender, cognitive impairment, functional impairment, physical disease, nor social desirability had a significant negative effect on the psychometric properties or screening efficacy of the CES-D. These results indicate that there was no significant degradation in the ability of the CES-D to screen for depression among community-residing elderly adults. This conclusion must be tempered by the fact that the sample did not include participants with the more disabling forms of cognitive or functional impairment and physical illness.
1,320 citations