Showing papers on "Coal published in 2014"

Recycling of carbon dioxide to methanol and derived products – closing the loop

Abstract: Starting with coal, followed by petroleum oil and natural gas, the utilization of fossil fuels has allowed the fast and unprecedented development of human society. However, the burning of these resources in ever increasing pace is accompanied by large amounts of anthropogenic CO2 emissions, which are outpacing the natural carbon cycle, causing adverse global environmental changes, the full extent of which is still unclear. Even through fossil fuels are still abundant, they are nevertheless limited and will, in time, be depleted. Chemical recycling of CO2 to renewable fuels and materials, primarily methanol, offers a powerful alternative to tackle both issues, that is, global climate change and fossil fuel depletion. The energy needed for the reduction of CO2 can come from any renewable energy source such as solar and wind. Methanol, the simplest C1 liquid product that can be easily obtained from any carbon source, including biomass and CO2, has been proposed as a key component of such an anthropogenic carbon cycle in the framework of a “Methanol Economy”. Methanol itself is an excellent fuel for internal combustion engines, fuel cells, stoves, etc. It's dehydration product, dimethyl ether, is a diesel fuel and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) substitute. Furthermore, methanol can be transformed to ethylene, propylene and most of the petrochemical products currently obtained from fossil fuels. The conversion of CO2 to methanol is discussed in detail in this review.

Methane leaks from North American natural gas systems

Abstract: Natural gas (NG) is a potential “bridge fuel” during transition to a decarbonized energy system: It emits less carbon dioxide during combustion than other fossil fuels and can be used in many industries. However, because of the high global warming potential of methane (CH4, the major component of NG), climate benefits from NG use depend on system leakage rates. Some recent estimates of leakage have challenged the benefits of switching from coal to NG, a large near-term greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction opportunity ( 1 – 3 ). Also, global atmospheric CH4 concentrations are on the rise, with the causes still poorly understood ( 4 ).

Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010

Abstract: This paper presents a quantitative analysis of the historic fossil fuel and cement production records of the 50 leading investor-owned, 31 state-owned, and 9 nation-state producers of oil, natural gas, coal, and cement from as early as 1854 to 2010. This analysis traces emissions totaling 914 GtCO2e—63 % of cumulative worldwide emissions of industrial CO2 and methane between 1751 and 2010—to the 90 “carbon major” entities based on the carbon content of marketed hydrocarbon fuels (subtracting for non-energy uses), process CO2 from cement manufacture, CO2 from flaring, venting, and own fuel use, and fugitive or vented methane. Cumulatively, emissions of 315 GtCO2e have been traced to investor-owned entities, 288 GtCO2e to state-owned enterprises, and 312 GtCO2e to nation-states. Of these emissions, half has been emitted since 1986. The carbon major entities possess fossil fuel reserves that will, if produced and emitted, intensify anthropogenic climate change. The purpose of the analysis is to understand the historic emissions as a factual matter, and to invite consideration of their possible relevance to public policy.

Erratum to “Experimental Analyses of the Major Parameters Affecting the Intensity of Outbursts of Coal and Gas”

Abstract: Here, we correct the errors made in Table 3 and equation (5) in the paper titled “Experimental Analyses of the Major Parameters Affecting the Intensity of Outbursts of Coal and Gas.” The purpose of this paper is to correct both the data input and the mathematical errors in Table 3 and equation (5). The data input (Gas pressure (Mpa)) in Column 5, Table 3, should be as in the table mentioned in this paper. The coefficients in equation (5) should be changed to RI=−1.5874x1+2.866x2−0.3791x3+19.567x4,x4≥0.72. (5)

The Environmental Costs and Benefits of Fracking

Abstract: Unconventional oil and natural gas extraction enabled by horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing (fracking) is driving an economic boom, with consequences described from “revolutionary” to “disastrous.” Reality lies somewhere in between. Unconventional energy generates income and, done well, can reduce air pollution and even water use compared with other fossil fuels. Alternatively, it could slow the adoption of renewables and, done poorly, release toxic chemicals into water and air. Primary threats to water resources include surface spills, wastewater disposal, and drinking-water contamination through poor well integrity. An increase in volatile organic compounds and air toxics locally are potential health threats, but the switch from coal to natural gas for electricity generation will reduce sulfur, nitrogen, mercury, and particulate air pollution. Data gaps are particularly evident for human health studies, for the question of whether natural gas will displace coal compared with renewables, and fo...

A review on microwave assisted pyrolysis of coal and biomass for fuel production

Abstract: The energy insecurity from oil and natural gas and increased CO2 emission from fossil fuels is driving societies to look for sustainable and renewable energy supply. The huge coal resources can serve as a potential source for fuels. Bio-energy from biomass has been recognized as renewable energy to reduce CO2 emission. Although fast pyrolysis has emerged as the most promising technology to convert organic materials to liquid fuels at shorter duration but it still faces some technical challenges in improving product yield, its quality and process energy efficiency. Microwave assisted pyrolysis of coal and biomass in the presence of microwave absorber provides distinctive environment to resolve these challenges. The microwave absorber can indirectly heat coal and biomass particles which are relatively microwave transparent and influence product yield and its quality by contributing as a catalytic precursor. The microwave heating of coal or biomass particles with microwave absorber shows efficient heating and sufficient contact of volatile or gas phase species with specific microwave absorber can improve fuel quality.

Coal–biomass co-combustion: An overview

Abstract: The energy sector in the global scenario faces a major challenge of providing energy at an affordable cost and simultaneously protecting the environment. The energy mix globally is primarily dominated by fossil fuels, coal being the major contributor. Increasing concerns on the adverse effect of the emissions arising from coal conversion technologies on the environment and the gradual depletion of the fossil fuel reserves had led to global initiatives on using renewables and other opportunity resources to meet the future energy demands in a sustainable manner. Use of coal with biomass as a supplementary fuel in the combustion or gasification based processes is a viable technological option for reducing the harmful emissions. Co-combustion of coal with biomass for electricity generation is gradually gaining ground in spite of the fact that their combustion behavior differ widely due to wide variations in their physical and chemical properties. This article deals with the technical aspects of co-combustion with emphasis on the fundamentals of devolatilization, ignition, burnout and ash deposition behavior along with the constraints and uncertainties associated with the use of different types of biomass of diverse characteristics and the likely impact of partial replacement of coal by biomass on the emission of CO2, SOx, NOx. Other issues of no less importance like sustained availability of biomass, transportation and storage, effect on biodiversity, etc., are left out in the study. The investigations reported in the study reflect the potential of biomass as co-fuel, and the scope of maximizing its proportion in the blend in the coal based power plants and the derived benefits.

Reduced emissions of CO2, NOx, and SO2 from U.S. power plants owing to switch from coal to natural gas with combined cycle technology

Abstract: Since 1997, an increasing fraction of electric power has been generated from natural gas in the United States. Here we use data from continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS), which measure emissions at the stack of most U.S. electric power generation units, to investigate how this switch affected the emissions of CO2, NOx, and SO2. Per unit of energy produced, natural gas power plants equipped with combined cycle technology emit on an average 44% of the CO2 compared with coal power plants. As a result of the increased use of natural gas, CO2 emissions from U.S. fossil-fuel power plants were 23% lower in 2012 than they would have been if coal had continued to provide the same fraction of electric power as in 1997. In addition, natural gas power plants with combined cycle technology emit less NOx and far less SO2 per unit of energy produced than coal power plants. Therefore, the increased use of natural gas has led to emission reductions of NOx (40%) and SO2 (44%), in addition to those obtained from the implementation of emission control systems on coal power plants. These benefits to air quality and climate should be weighed against the increase in emissions of methane, volatile organic compounds, and other trace gases that are associated with the production, processing, storage, and transport of natural gas.

The energy and water nexus in Chinese electricity production: A hybrid life cycle analysis

Abstract: Between 2000 and 2010, China׳s electricity production had increased threefold and accounted for 50% of domestic and 12% of global CO 2 emissions in 2010. Substantial changes in the electricity fuel mix are urgently required to meet China׳s carbon intensity target of reducing CO 2 emissions by 40–45% by 2020. Moreover, electricity production is the second largest consumer of water in China, but water requirements vary significantly between different electricity generation technologies. By integrating process-based life-cycle analysis (LCA) and input–output analysis (IOA) and through tracking national supply chains, we have provided a detailed account of total life-cycle carbon emissions (g/kWh) and water consumption (l/kWh) for eight electricity generation technologies – (pulverized) coal, gas, oil, hydro, nuclear, wind, solar photovoltaic, and biomass. We have demonstrated that a shift to low carbon renewable electricity generation technologies, i.e. wind, could potentially save more than 79% of total life-cycle CO 2 emissions and more than 50% water consumption per kWh electricity generation compared to the current fuel mix and technology for electricity generation. If the projected wind farms are built by 2020, Inner Mongolia, one of the water scarce northern provinces, would annually save 179 MT CO 2 (i.e. 44% of Inner Mongolia׳s total CO 2 emissions in 2008) and 418 million m 3 (Mm 3 ) water (18% of its industrial water use in 2008) compared with the same amount of electricity produced from coal.

New and improved system for processing various chemicals and materials

Abstract: Eco-friendly systems, methods and processes/processing (EFSMP) or an integrated Matrix encompasses stand-alone and/or interconnected modules for completely self-sustained, closed-loop, emission-free processing of mutiple source feedstock that can include pretreatment, with poisoning materials isolated during pretreatment being further recycled to provide useful materials such as, for example, separated metals, carbon and fullerenes for production of nano materials, sulfur, water, sulfuric acid, gas, heat and carbon dioxide for energy production, and production of refined petroleum, at a highly-reduced cost over the best state-of-the-art refining methods/systems that meets new emissions standards as well as optimizes production output with new ultra-speed cycle times. By-products from the petroleum refining process which were previously discarded also now are recycled as renewable sources of energy (water, waste oil and rubber/coal derived pyrolyic (pyro lysis) oil, carbon gases and process gases), or recyclable resources, such as metals and precious metals, oxides, minerals, etc., can be obtained.

A Review of Thermal Co-Conversion of Coal and Biomass/Waste

Abstract: Biomass is relatively cleaner than coal and is the only renewable carbon resource that can be directly converted into fuel. Biomass can significantly contribute to the world’s energy needs if harnessed sustainably. However, there are also problems associated with the thermal conversion of biomass. This paper investigates and discusses issues associated with the thermal conversion of coal and biomass as a blend. Most notable topics reviewed are slagging and fouling caused by the relatively reactive alkali and alkaline earth compounds (K2O, Na2O and CaO) found in biomass ash. The alkali and alkaline earth metals (AAEM) present and dispersed in biomass fuels induce catalytic activity during co-conversion with coal. The catalytic activity is most noticeable when blended with high rank coals. The synergy during co-conversion is still controversial although it has been theorized that biomass acts like a hydrogen donor in liquefaction. Published literature also shows that coal and biomass exhibit different mechanisms, depending on the operating conditions, for the formation of nitrogen (N) and sulfur species. Utilization aspects of fly ash from blending coal and biomass are discussed. Recommendations are made on pretreatment options to increase the energy density of biomass fuels through pelletization, torrefaction and flash pyrolysis to reduce transportation costs.

Pyrolysis of Liulin Coal Simulated by GPU-Based ReaxFF MD with Cheminformatics Analysis

Abstract: In this study, the first GPU-enabled ReaxFF MD program with significantly improved performance, surpassing CPU implementations, was employed to explore the initial chemical mechanisms and product distributions in pyrolysis of Liulin coal, a bituminous coal from Shanxi, PRC. The largest coal model ever used in simulation via ReaxFF MD, the Liulin coal molecular model consisting of 28 351 atoms was constructed based on a combination of experiments and classical coal models. The ReaxFF MD simulations at temperatures of 1000-2600 K were performed for 250 Ps to investigate the temperature effects on the product profile and the initial chemical reactions of the Liulin coal model pyrolysis. The generation rates of C-14-C-40 compounds and gas tend to equilibrate within 150-250 ps, indicating that the simulation should allow most of the thermal decomposition reactions complete and the simulated product profiles are reasonable for understanding the chemical reactions of the Liulin coal pyrolysis. The product (gas, tar, and char) evolution tendencies with time and temperature observed in the simulations are fairly in agreement with the experimental tendency reported in the literature. In particular, the evolution trends of three representative products (naphthalene, methyl-naphthalene and dimethyl-naphthalene) with temperature are very consistent with Py-GC/MS experiments. The detailed chemical reactions of the pyrolysis simulation have been generated using VARMD (Visualization and Analysis of Reactive Molecular Dynamics), which was newly created to examine the complexity of the chemical reaction network in ReaxFF MD simulation. The generation and consumption of HO center dot and H3C. radicals with time and temperature are reasonable and consistent both with the evolution of H2O and CH4, and with the detailed chemical reactions obtained as well. The amount of six-membered ring structures was observed to decrease with time and temperature, because of their conversion into 5-membered rings or 7-9-membered rings or even-larger-membered ring structures that will further open and decompose into small fragments. This work demonstrates a new methodology for investigating coal pyrolysis mechanism by combining GPU-enabled high-performance computing with cheminformatics analysis in ReaxFF MD.

Review of fly ash inertisation treatments and recycling

Abstract: Fly ash (FA) is a by-product of power, and incineration plants operated either on coal and biomass, or on municipal solid waste. FA can be divided into coal fly ash, obtained from power plant burning coal, flue gas desulphurisation FA, that is, the by-product generated by the air pollution control equipment in coal-fired power plants to reduce the release of SO2, biomass FA produced in the plants for thermal conversion of biomass and municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) FA, that is, the finest residue obtained from the scrubber system in a MSWI plant. Because of the large amount produced in the world, fly ash is now considered the world’s fifth largest material resource. The composition of FA is very variable, depending on its origins; then, also pollutants can be very different. In this frame, it is fundamental to exploit the chemical or physical potentials of FA constituents, thus rendering them second-life functionality. This review paper is addressed to FA typology, composition, treatment, recycling, functional reuse and metal and organic pollutants abatement. Because of the general growing of environmental awareness and increasing energy and material demand, it is expected that increasing recycling rates will reduce the pressure on demand for primary raw materials, help to reuse valuable materials which would otherwise be wasted and reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from extraction and processing.