Collusion

About: Collusion is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 5587 publications have been published within this topic receiving 119527 citations. The topic is also known as: Collusive agreement & Collusive pricing.

Noncooperative collusion under imperfect price information

Abstract: Recent work in game theory has shown that, in principle, it may be possible for firms in an industry to form a self-policing cartel to maximize their joint profits. This paper examines the nature of cartel self-enforcement in the presence of demand uncertainty. A model of a noncooperatively supported cartel is presented, and the aspects of industry structure which would make such a cartel viable are discussed.

Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly With Spillovers

Abstract: Contrary to the usual assumption made in most oligopoly models, relations among firms are seldom of a wholly cooperative or noncooperative type: in many situations, they compete in some fields, while they cooperate in others. An important example is the case of cooperative research efforts bringing fierce competitors together. Two types of agreement are observed. First R&D cooperation can take place at the so-called “precompetitive stage”: companies share basic information and efforts in the R&D stage but remain rivals in the market-place.1 A second type of agreement involves an extended collusion between partners, creating common policies at the product level. The usual justifications of this extension are the difficulties of protecting intellectual property. The idea is then to allow partners who have achieved inventions together, to also control together the processes and products which embody the results of their collaboration, in order to recuperate jointly their R&D investments.2 What could be expected from these types of agreement is a reduction in R&D expenditures, because of less wasteful duplication, and a reduction of total production, because of more ∗Reprinted from The American Economic Review, 78(5), 1133-1137, 1988. †Center for Operations Research & Econometrics, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. We are grateful to Jean

Measuring Market Power in the Ready-to-Eat Cereal Industry

Abstract: The ready-to-eat cereal industry is characterized by high concentration, high price-cost margins, large advertising-to-sales ratios, and numerous introductions of new products. Previous researchers have concluded that the ready-to-eat cereal industry is a classic example of an industry with nearly collusive pricing behavior and intense nonprice competition. This paper empirically examines this conclusion. In particular, I estimate price-cost margins, but more importantly I am able empirically to separate these margins into three sources: (i) that which is due to product differentiation; (ii) that which is due to multi-product firm pricing; and (iii) that due to potential price collusion. The results suggest that given the demand for different brands of cereal, the first two effects explain most of the observed price-cost margins. I conclude that prices in the industry are consistent with noncollusive pricing behavior, despite the high price-cost margins. Leading firms are able to maintain a portfolio of differentiated products and influence the perceived product quality. It is these two factors that lead to high price-cost margins.

Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools

Abstract: The "oligopoly problem"--the question of how prices are formed when the market contains only a few competitors--is one of the more persistent problems in the history of economic thought. In this book Xavier Vives applies a modern game-theoretic approach to develop a theory of oligopoly pricing. Vives begins by relating classic contributions to the field--including those of Cournot, Bertrand, Edgeworth, Chamberlin, and Robinson--to modern game theory. In his discussion of basic game-theoretic tools and equilibrium, he pays particular attention to recent developments in the theory of supermodular games. The middle section of the book, an in-depth treatment of classic static models, provides specialized existence results, characterizations of equilibria, extensions to large markets, and an analysis of comparative statics with a view toward applied work. The final chapters examine commitment issues, entry, information transmission, and collusion using a variety of tools: two-stage games, the modeling of competition under asymmetric information and mechanism design theory, and the theory of repeated and dynamic games, including Markov perfect equilibrium and differential games.

Measuring Market Power in the Ready-to-Eat Cereal Industry

Abstract: The ready-to-eat cereal industry is characterized by high concentration margins, large advertising to sales ratios, and numerous introductions of new products. Previous researchers have concluded that the ready-to-eat cereal industry is a classic example of an industry with nearly collusive pricing behavior and intense non-price competition. This paper empirically examines this conclusion. In particular, I estimate price-cost margins importantly I am able empirically to separate these margins into three parts: (1) that which is due to product differentiation; (2) that which is due to multi-product firm pricing; and (3) that due to potential price collusion. The results suggest that given the demand for different brands of cereal, the first two effects explain most of the observed price-cost markups. I conclude that prices in the industry are consistent with non-collusive pricing behavior to maintain a portfolio of differentiated products influence the perceived quality of these products, and it is these two factors that lead to high price-cost margins.