Contrast (vision)

About: Contrast (vision) is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 10379 publications have been published within this topic receiving 221480 citations.

Direction identification thresholds for second-order motion in central and peripheral vision

Abstract: Evidence bearing on the question of whether first-order and second-order motion are detected by use of the same or different principles has been sought. This question was approached by measuring thresholds for correctly identifying the direction of motion of various second-order motion patterns. The patterns used were contrast-modulated noise patterns in which the contrast of a carrier was modulated sinusoidally in one dimension, and the modulating waveform drifted smoothly while the carrier itself remained stationary. The carrier used was in most cases static two-dimensional noise; other carriers gave similar results. Thresholds were measured in terms of amplitude of contrast modulation (modulation depth) for each of a range of envelope drift speeds and spatial frequencies in the fovea and at several viewing eccentricities. Along with direction-identification thresholds, thresholds for either simple detection of the modulation or for correctly identifying the orientation of the modulation were simultaneously measured. Thresholds for direction identification were generally somewhat higher than those for simple detection. However, they were in most cases very similar to thresholds for identification of orientation, as found for conventional luminance gratings. Contrary to some reports, sensitivity to contrast-modulated patterns declines with eccentricity at a similar rate to that found with luminance gratings. The results suggest that first-order and second-order motion are either detected by a common motion-detection mechanism or are detected by different mechanisms that use a common principle of motion detection.

Effect of levodopa on contrast sensitivity and scotomas in human amblyopia.

Abstract: The neurotransmitter dopamine (DA) is involved in several visual functions. Visual deprivation decreases retinal DA concentration in chickens and monkeys. In animals with deprivation amblyopia, several studies suggest that neurotransmitters are involved in visual-cortical plasticity and can restore partial visual acuity in adult cats. We investigated in a cross-over, double-masked study the influence of levodopa on contrast sensitivity and binocular suppression in human adult strabismic and amblyopic patients. After one single administration of levodopa, a significant increase in contrast sensitivity and decrease of the size of the fixation point scotoma was found. No changes could be detected after placebo administration. Levodopa did not induce changes in contrast sensitivity in the dominant eyes of the patients or in normal subjects. In conclusion, we found a short-term effect of levodopa on contrast sensitivity and fixation point scotomas in amblyopic eyes of adult patients.

Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis. one-year follow-up.

Abstract: Purpose To determine whether contrast sensitivity measurement, a more sensitive test of visual function than visual acuity, better characterizes visual outcomes after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Setting Hong Kong Laser Eye Centre, Hong Kong, China. Methods Contrast sensitivity was monitored in 41 LASIK patients for 1 year. Seven spatial frequencies (0.3, 0.8, 1.5, 3.4, 6.9, 10.3, and 20.5 cpd) were tested with 15 sequences per spatial frequency, and a staircase technique was used for target presentation. Results There was a general depression in the contrast sensitivity function after LASIK; 1.5 cpd and 3.4 cpd were the most affected frequencies. Recovery took at least 6 months. The reduction in contrast sensitivity was greater for higher amounts of myopia. Conclusion The post-LASIK nonpermanent depression in contrast sensitivity was probably due to optical factors.

Cortical Magnification Theory Fails to Predict Visual Recognition

Abstract: The sense of form is poor in indirect view. Yet the cortical magnification theory asserts that the disadvantage can be made up by scaling the image size according to the spatial variation in the mapping of the retina onto the cortex. It is thus assumed that all visual information passes through a functionally homogeneous neural circuitry, with the spatial sampling of input signals varying across the visual field. We challenge this notion by showing that character recognition in the visual field cannot be accommodated by any concept of sole size scaling but requires increasing both size and contrast of the target being viewed. This finding is formalized into a hyperbolic law which states that target size multiplied by log contrast is constant across the visual field. We conclude that the scalar cortical magnification theory fails for character recognition since the latter depends on multidimensional pattern representations in higher, i.e. striate and prestriate, cortical areas.