scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Contrast (vision)

About: Contrast (vision) is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 10379 publications have been published within this topic receiving 221480 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Chung et al. as mentioned in this paper compared the shape of contrast sensitivity functions for normal and low vision using a Bayesian adaptive procedure to select the spatial frequency and contrast of each trial to maximize the expected information gain.
Abstract: Low Vision Comparing the Shape of Contrast Sensitivity Functions for Normal and Low Vision Susana T. L. Chung 1 and Gordon E. Legge 2 School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States Correspondence: Susana T. L. Chung, 360 Minor Hall, School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-2020, USA; s.chung@berkeley.edu. Submitted: August 31, 2015 Accepted: December 9, 2015 Citation: Chung STL, Legge GE. Com- paring the shape of contrast sensitivity functions for normal and low vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:198–207. DOI:10.1167/ iovs.15-18084 P URPOSE . The contrast sensitivity function (CSF) provides a detailed description of an individual’s spatial-pattern detection capability. We tested the hypothesis that the CSFs of people with low vision differ from a ‘‘normal’’ CSF only in their horizontal and vertical positions along the spatial frequency (SF) and contrast sensitivity (CS) axes. M ETHODS . Contrast sensitivity for detecting horizontal sinewave gratings was measured with a two temporal-interval forced-choice staircase procedure, for a range of SFs spanning 5 to 6 octaves, for 20 low-vision observers and five adults with normal vision. An asymmetric parabolic function was used to fit the aggregate data of the normal-vision observers, yielding the ‘‘normal template.’’ Each of the 20 low-vision CSFs was fit in two ways, by using a shape- invariant version of the normal template (with the width parameters fixed) that was shifted along the log-SF and log-CS axes, and by an unconstrained asymmetric parabolic function (‘‘free-fit’’). R ESULTS . The two fitting methods yielded values of the peak CS, the SF corresponding to peak CS, and the high cut-off SF that were highly correlated and in good agreement with each other. In addition, the width parameters of the low-vision CSFs were comparable with those of the normal template, implying that low-vision CSFs are similar in shape to the normal CSF. C ONCLUSIONS . The excellent agreement of parameters estimated by the two fitting methods suggests that low-vision CSFs can be approximated by a normal CSF shifted along the log-SF and log-CS axes to account for the impaired acuity and contrast sensitivity. Keywords: contrast sensitivity function, low vision, psychophysics, spatial vision ur ability to detect the presence of an object depends on the size of the object (larger is generally easier to detect), and also on the presence of any differences, such as a luminance difference, between the object and its background. The sensitivity to the relative difference in luminance of an object from its background is referred to as contrast sensitivity. Contrast sensitivity depends on object size. A complete representation of how contrast sensitivity depends on object size is referred to as the contrast sensitivity function (CSF), where the object size is usually specified in spatial frequency (c/deg) of a sinewave pattern. As such, the CSF provides a rich description of an individual’s spatial-pattern detection capabil- ity. Knowing the CSF of a person with low vision is often informative about their ability to see shapes and recognize objects in their daily lives. The gold standard for determining a CSF is to measure contrast thresholds for detecting sinusoidal gratings across a range of spatial frequencies using robust psychophysical techniques. 1,2 However, this method is time consuming, technically demanding, and requires a carefully calibrated display, and thus is not amenable for the determination of CSF for clinical patients. Recently, a method that uses a Bayesian adaptive procedure to select the spatial frequency and contrast of each trial to maximize the expected information gain has been developed for measuring CSFs. 3,4 The efficiency of this quick CSF method relies on its assumptions about the shape of the CSF and requires 100 trials to achieve good O agreement with a CSF measured with the conventional method. 4 The determination of CSF could be made more efficient if we could reduce the number of measurements required to estimate the full CSF, and link those measurements to standard clinical measures. In fact, an important simplifica- tion would exist if low-vision CSFs are similar in shape to normal CSFs, differing only in their positions on the spatial frequency (SF) and contrast sensitivity (CS) axes. In this paper, we test this hypothesis. There are several ways in which low-vision CSFs could differ in shape from normal-vision CSFs. For example, if contrast sensitivity loss occurs primarily at high spatial frequencies, then the fall-off of contrast sensitivity with high spatial frequencies would be steeper than observed in a normal-vision CSF (Fig. 1A). In the case that contrast sensitivity is equally affected across all spatial frequencies, the resulting CSF would appear as a vertical shift of a normal-vision CSF (Fig. 1B). Alternatively, if the reduction is not uniform across frequencies, then the resulting CSF may look like the one shown in Figure 1C. In addition, notches, representing CS loss only at SFs between the peak SF and the high SF cutoff (Fig. 1D), have been reported for patients with neurologic diseases such as multiple sclerosis. 5 Notches can also be due to uncorrected refractive errors 6 or imprecision of measurements 7 ; but because they are not the etiologies of low vision, they will not be considered for the purpose of this paper. Despite the fact that some low-vision CSFs may differ in shape from normal-vision CSFs, a previous iovs.arvojournals.org j ISSN: 1552-5783 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/Journals/IOVS/934840/ on 01/21/2016

57 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a much shorter perceptual training regime, in association with high-frequency transcranial electrical stimulation (hf-tRNS), was used to improve visual functions in a group of adult participants with amblyopia.
Abstract: Amblyopia is a visual disorder due to an abnormal pattern of functional connectivity of the visual cortex and characterized by several visual deficits of spatial vision including impairments of visual acuity (VA) and of the contrast sensitivity function (CSF). Despite being a developmental disorder caused by reduced visual stimulation during early life (critical period), several studies have shown that extensive visual perceptual training can improve VA and CSF in people with amblyopia even in adulthood. With the present study we assessed whether a much shorter perceptual training regime, in association with high-frequency transcranial electrical stimulation (hf-tRNS), was able to improve visual functions in a group of adult participants with amblyopia. Results show that, in comparison with previous studies where a large number sessions with a similar training regime were used (Polat et al., 2004), here just eight sessions of training in contrast detection under lateral masking conditions combined with hf-tRNS, were able to substantially improve VA and CSF in adults with amblyopia.

57 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Under some circumstances, a small (1 dB, about 26%) increment in size could make a previously invisible optotype clearly visible, or vice versa, and the term vanishing optotype is suggested for acuity targets with this peculiar property.
Abstract: Acuity test letters generated on a television monitor were studied with regard to detection and resolution thresholds, both for the native configurations and after high-pass spatial frequency filtering. Comparisons were made with printed acuity charts of different contrast. Filtering diminished the interval between detection and resolution thresholds. Under some circumstances, a small (1 dB, about 26%) increment in size could make a previously invisible optotype clearly visible, or vice versa. The term vanishing optotype is suggested for acuity targets with this peculiar property. Vanishing optotypes do not seem useful for routine clinical acuity testing, but they may be advantageous, for example, in preferential looking-acuity tests for infants and visual field examinations. Like the present tests, such novel applications can be generated relatively easily on personal computers.

57 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results support models of grouping in which brightness and edge information are processed separately and models of visual search in which complex relations between stimuli can be computed in parallel across the display.
Abstract: Preattentive grouping is supported by 2 systems, a brightness system that is contrast polarity sensitive and an edge system that is relatively insensitive to contrast polarity. Search was spatially parallel for pairs of same contrast polarity vertically aligned circles, among horizontal pairs, and serial for pairs of circles that had the opposite contrast polarity (Experiments 1-3). By replacing the circles with squares, the authors investigated the effect of adding collinear edge information. When collinear edges were present, the polarity difference between paired items did not disrupt grouping (Experiments 4-6). These results support models of grouping in which brightness and edge information are processed separately (e.g., S. Grossberg & E. Mingolla, 1985) and models of visual search in which complex relations between stimuli can be computed in parallel across the display.

56 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is concluded that early cone-specific regulation of sensitivity cannot be responsible for the change in perceived colour, and chromatic induction takes place after contrast gain control, and the more colourful surroundings had considerably less influence on subjects' colour judgments.
Abstract: Judgments of the colour of a surface are influenced by the colour of the surrounding. To determine whether only the average colour of the surrounding matters, or also the chromatic variability, judgments in colourful scenes are often compared with ones in which a target is surrounded by a plain background that provides the same average physical illumination of the retina as the colourful scene. The variability sometimes makes a difference (eg Shevell and Wei, 1998 Vision Research 38 1561-1566), and sometimes it does not (eg Brenner and Cornelissen, 1998 Vision Research 38 1789-1793). Is this because of the nonlinearity in cone responses? We designed scenes that stimulated the cones in an equivalent manner, both on average and in terms of variability, and yet differed markedly in chromatic variability. The more colourful surroundings had considerably less influence on subjects' colour judgments. We conclude that early cone-specific regulation of sensitivity cannot be responsible for the change in perceived colour, and deduce that chromatic induction takes place after contrast gain control.

56 citations


Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20241
20231,864
20223,760
2021413
2020329
2019354