Topic
Convention on Biological Diversity
About: Convention on Biological Diversity is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 2232 publications have been published within this topic receiving 65599 citations. The topic is also known as: CBD & United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used the spatially explicit reserve design software, Marxan, to identify priority sites for protected area expansion under climate change in the state of New South Wales (NSW), Australia.
Abstract: Protected areas are the primary strategy for maintaining natural landscapes and separating biodiversity features from preventable anthropogenic threats. The Convention on Biological Diversity calls for the coverage of at least 17% of land by protected areas, and the strategic prioritization of important biodiversity areas. Using the spatially explicit reserve design software, Marxan, this study combines climate refugia modelled under future climates in the year 2070 and bioregions to identify priority sites for protected area expansion under climate change in the state of New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Priority sites for new protected areas that meet bioregion and climate refugia targets were identified in central-western, northeast and patches of southeast NSW. Seven existing parks, including Kosciuszko National Park, overlapped with regions identified repeatedly as climate refugia under 12 future climate scenarios. The recommendations from this study support policy-makers in prioritizing the protection of biodiversity under a changing and uncertain climate.
25 citations
01 Jan 2004
TL;DR: The authors in this paper reviewed the legal system of Kenya based on legislation and common law to evaluate the adequacy and relevance of such regimes to liability and redress for damage caused by transboundary movement of Living Modified Organisms.
Abstract: The coming into force of the Biosafety Protocol2
charts out a new direction in the
growth and development of modern biotechnology. It is a timely and vital development
given that in a very short time frame, transgenic croplands have increased rapidly. This
decade will witness many African countries adopt and commercialize transgenic crops.
However, efforts to invest have to be guided by sound mechanisms for assessing risks
and benefits. This is crucial to enable African governments to make informed choices
and decisions.
The Protocol, an internationally binding legal instrument concluded by parties to the
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), was the result of the work of the Ad hoc
Working Group on Biosafety which was set up in 1995 and completed its work in 2000.
The Protocol aims at comprehensively addressing concerns raised about biotechnology.
These concerns include safe handling, use, and transfer of living modified organisms
(LMOs).3
All Parties to the Protocol have the obligation to comply with its terms.
However, the obligations set out in the Protocol do not fully align with the national
needs and priorities of many African countries. The numerous areas of non-consensus
within the Biosafety Working Group support the validity of this assertion.
4
The Protocol
contains not only elements of compromise but also provisions forced upon by some
parties, particularly African States.5
The indefinite position on liability and redress is
one such issue. However, most African States intend to implement the Protocol and
some have begun putting in place mechanisms for biosafety.6
To provide a suitable
framework for the implementation of the biosafety measures, parties are required to
put in place relevant national legislation.7
For LMOs intended for direct use as feed,
food or processing, only developed countries are obligated to put in place domestic
regulatory frameworks while developing countries including those with economies in
transition need only make decisions based on risk assessments.8 The challenge for
African states is to put in place effective legal and administrative structures to implement
the Protocol. African countries have been particularly concerned about the potential
harmful impacts of biotechnology on their environment and most of them have put in
place precautionary frameworks for biosafety The objective of this paper is to review Kenya s legal system based both on legislation
and common law. The main objective of the review is to analyse the adequacy and
relevance of such regimes to liability and redress for damage caused by transboundary
movement of Living Modified Organisms. It will seek to ascertain principles or provisions
that can help form the country s and regional position in future negotiations for the
elaboration of article 27. As a starting point, the paper will give an overview of the
Protocol s main provisions. We view the Protocol as an environmental impact assessment
aid and this position is borne out by the inclusion of major developments in biotechnology
including the introduction and testing of genetically modified organisms in the Second
Schedule of the Environment Management and Coordination Act (EMCA) as one of the
projects that should undergo environmental impact assessment. We will look at Kenya s
Constitution and other laws and identify the main liability regimes that exist under the
domestic legal framework.
25 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated a socio-economic and ecological framework for integrating local communities into assessments of global environmental conventions (GECs), such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD).
Abstract: Participation by local communities in the assessment and monitoring of efforts to implement global environmental conventions (GECs), such as Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), is a topic of growing interest worldwide. Previous implementation efforts were constrained by the lack of a methodological framework that integrates local knowledge and ecological methods. This study, conducted with assistance from Maasai herders in northern Tanzania, evaluated a socio-economic and ecological framework for integrating local communities into assessments of the GECs. To reach decisions related to CBD, herders used livestock grazing suitability (GS) and proxy indicators of biodiversity, while to reach decisions related to CCD herders used potential grazing capacity (PGC) related to the risk of degradation. We proposed criteria for indicator selection and developed step-wise research methods to assess performance of the indicators at spatial scales. The ecological and anthropogenic indicators were then analysed using a correlation matrix to evaluate management decisions. We showed that changes in ecological indicators influenced herder decisions. The anthropogenic indicators for potential were more sensitive to changes in soil degradation, range conditions and trends; while the decisions related to GS were more sensitive to the majority of the proxy indicators of biodiversity. The decisions reflected the potential responses to management, which had implications for CBD and CCD. Because decisions constitute a multiplicity of activities, the responses by local communities could be related to the potential role played by each indicator in the implementation of the convention at the local level. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
25 citations
••
TL;DR: Noncommercial research should expeditiously assert its interests and state its needs in the ABS negotiations to market to policy makers its special dual role as user of genetic resources and as generator of essential knowledge for the benefit of the CBD and society at large.
25 citations
••
University of Newcastle1, Mammal Research Institute2, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University3, University of Southern Queensland4, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries5, University of New England (Australia)6, University of Oxford7, Monash University8, Macquarie University9, Fauna & Flora International10, Endangered Wildlife Trust11, National University of Misiones12, Newcastle University13, Australian National University14, University of Queensland15, UPRRP College of Natural Sciences16, Michigan State University17, University of New South Wales18, University of Mpumalanga19, Rhodes University20, University of Adelaide21, Instituto Politécnico Nacional22
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the tenets of "compassionate conservation" are not scientifically proven to improve conservation outcomes, yet are critical of the current methods that do.
25 citations