Showing papers on "Corporate governance published in 1975"
Book•
01 Jun 1975
34 citations
Book•
01 Jan 1975
27 citations
20 citations
16 citations
01 Jan 1975
TL;DR: A recent survey by Social Systems, Inc. as mentioned in this paper indicates that since 1970 over 1000 corporations in the United States and Canada have begun developing and using corporate simulation models, however, the percentage of corporations that have experience with corporate models remains relatively small.
Abstract: A recent survey by Social Systems, Inc., indicates that since 1970 over 1000 corporations in the United States and Canada have begun developing and using corporate simulation models. However, the percentage of corporations that have experience with corporate models remains relatively small. Why aren't more corporations using these models today? Why are the corporate model users restricted to the larger corporations? Are the primary constraints impeding the use of these models technical problems, computer hardware problems, software problems, or political problems?
12 citations
Book•
01 Jan 1975
12 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, a theoretically based articulation of the concept of legitimacy and application of the concepts of legitimacy to concrete problems in university governance has been proposed, which is measured by the assessment of several elements of governance by constituents.
Abstract: This paper attempts a theoretically based articulation of the concept of legitimacy and applies the elements of the concept to concrete problems in university governance. Legitimacy is measured by the assessment of several elements of governance by constituents. It is a function of constituents' value systems, of the decision-making issue, and of the level at which decisions are made. The components of legitimacy are developed, and illustrative applications are provided. Through operational application of the idea of political legitimacy, it is contended that more realistic and workable solutions to governance can be approximated and that crisis oriented governance tactics can be reserved for situations which genuinely require them.
Book•
01 Jan 1975
Journal Article•
Book•
01 Jun 1975
TL;DR: The Economics of the Corporate Economy as discussed by the authors is a seminal work in the field of organizational research and economic analysis of the corporate economy. Journal of the Operational Research Society: Vol. 27, Volume 27, issue 4, pp. 1033-1033.
Abstract: (1976). The Economics of the Corporate Economy. Journal of the Operational Research Society: Vol. 27, Volume 27, issue 4, pp. 1033-1033.
29 Dec 1975
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a survey of the state of the art in bioinformatics research, including the following: http://www.docurentresume.com/
Abstract: DOCURENT RESUME
Journal Article•
Journal Article•
01 Aug 1975
TL;DR: The authors argue that profit maximization is a doctrine that is no longer a defense of the corporation's role in society, and that the corporation has only one role: to maximize profits for the shareholder owner.
Abstract: Traditionally the corporation has one role in society: to maximize profits for the shareholder owner. On the other hand, there are those who argue that profit maximization is a doctrine that is no ...
TL;DR: A recent study revealed that 7 out of every 10 faculty members now say they would vote for a collective bargaining agent if an election were held on their campus as mentioned in this paper, while a number of facts about the causes of this unionization and the
Abstract: seventh of the colleges and universities in the country. Some 12 percent of all professional staff and over 20 percent of the full-time teaching faculty in American higher education are currently represented by unions. One recent study revealed that 7 out of every 10 faculty members now say they would vote for a collective bargaining agent if an election were held on their campus. While a number of facts about the causes of this unionization and the
TL;DR: Powell and Vergin this article have published several books and numerous articles on economics and commerce. But their main contribution is the introduction of the E.P.D. Services for MacMillan Bloedel Limited.
Abstract: Mr. Powell is Manager, E.D.P. Services for MacMillan Bloedel Limited, Vancouver, British Columbia. He holds a BASc in chemical engineering from the University of British Columbia and an MBA from Simon Fraser University. Mr. Vergin is Professor of Economics and Commerce at Simon Fraser University. He holds a BA, MS and PhD in Business Administration from the University of Minnesota. He is the author of two books and numerous articles.
TL;DR: Governance can be improved through a study of structure, but if the participants' behavior remains unchanged, new systems soon are burdened with the problems of their predecessors.
Abstract: Governance can be improved through a study of structure, but if the participants' behavior remains unchanged, new systems soon are burdened with the problems of their predecessors. The pleasures and the pain induced by improving human relations are well described.
TL;DR: The second Stuart inherited an impoverished royal treasury, and the eleven years' interval without parliament further curtailed the king's access to traditional sources of income as discussed by the authors, and despite Charles's ingenuity for financial devices of dubious legality, opposition to the ship money tax was due more often to mundane bureaucratic problems, such as procedural confusion in rating or dissatisfaction with administrative personnel.
Abstract: I 'T'HE reign of Charles I, prior to the outbreak of the Civil A War, witnessed royal dependence on numerous financial expedients forced loans, compulsory knighthoods, ship money, coat and conduct money which aroused hostility and criticism among certain of the more vociferous of his subjects.1 The second Stuart inherited an impoverished royal treasury, and the eleven years' interval without parliament further curtailed the king's access to traditional sources of income. Despite Charles's ingenuity for financial devices of dubious legality, opposition to the ship money tax was due more often to mundane bureaucratic problems, such as procedural confusion in rating or dissatisfaction with administrative personnel, than to principled constitutional objections.2 By 1640, when the House of Commons exploited ship money as a major grievance against the king and indicted Charles's governance, three of the complaints in the Grand Remonstrance concerned ship money.3 During the annual
Book•
01 Jan 1975