scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Corporate sustainability

About: Corporate sustainability is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 3517 publications have been published within this topic receiving 94075 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a mixed methods design was employed featuring semi-structured interviews with managers (sustainability experts, business managers from various functions) and external stakeholders; and self-completion questionnaires (also targeting sustainability experts and business managers) to collect complementary quantitative data.
Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to fill the void of empirical cross‐industry research in the area of corporate sustainability management and its business case.Design/methodology/approach – Nine industries (oil and gas, utility, aviation, automotive, chemical, pharmaceutical, technology, financial services and food and beverage) are compared in terms of their environmental and social issues, the pressure they face from their stakeholders, and the resulting business case for corporate sustainability. For this approach, a mixed methods design was employed featuring semi‐structured interviews with managers (sustainability experts, business managers from various functions) and external stakeholders); and self‐completion questionnaires (also targeting sustainability experts and business managers) to collect complementary quantitative data. It was possible to draw upon more than 400 interviews and 1,100 questionnaires.Findings – It was ascertained that the business case is clearly sector‐specific and diff...

96 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed the understanding and relevance of some major CEE companies that are leaders in sustainability reporting and concluded that the understanding of corporate responsibility is context-specific, but also that the differences are not as stark as one might expect.
Abstract: In Western Europe, corporate (social) responsibility (CR) has become a popular concept that no major company can afford to ignore. However, what about the major companies from the new Central-Eastern Europe (CEE) Member States? The present paper is one of the first attempts to analyse the understanding and relevance of the CR of some major CEE companies that are leaders in sustainability reporting. This analysis is conducted in direct comparison with a similar analysis on major Western European companies. Methodologically, the paper intertwines two qualitative strands of research: An analysis of 19 CR reports (12 from CEE and 7 from Western Europe) provides a general impression about the understanding of CR across different socio-political contexts. This report-based depiction is complemented by two surveys of 22 companies (11 from CEE and 11 from Western Europe). The surveys show the relevance that the companies attach to specific CR issues. Overall, the paper concludes that the understanding of CR is context-specific, but also that, in the case of major companies that are leading in CR reporting, the differences are not as stark as one might expect.

96 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a formal approach for integrating the societal perspective of sustainable development with the corporate perspective of CSR and CS is presented, which is complementary to a company's internal CSR evaluation.
Abstract: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate sustainability (CS) are variously defined in the literature. Providing formal definitions for the two concepts, we show in this article that CS and CSR are distinct but interrelated concepts that can be usefully formalized with capital-theoretic and welfare economic approaches. CSR can particularly constitute a strategy to cope with externalities and serve as insurance against reputational risks that harm profit prospects and corporate value. Moreover, we present a formal approach for integrating the societal perspective of sustainable development with the corporate perspective of CSR and CS. This approach is complementary to a company's internal CSR and CS evaluation.

95 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors classify corporate responsibility actions into three types: philanthropy, CR integration and CR innovation, and examine different forms of corporate engagement with nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) through this categorization.
Abstract: Purpose – This paper aims to classify different corporate responsibility (CR) actions into three types – philanthropy, CR integration and CR innovation – and examines different forms of corporate engagement with nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) through this categorization. The focus is on the societal and business outcomes of engagement.Design/methodology/approach – The study analyzes 20 business‐NGO collaborations of three case companies – Hindustan Unilever, Nokia and Stora Enso. Cases are chosen based on revelatory sampling and data are gathered through documentary research of corporate sustainability reports, project reports and websites. Data analysis focuses on engagement forms, business and societal outcomes of engagement and utilizes a categorization of CR.Findings – Different CR types involve different forms of cooperation ranging from sponsorship to partnership. Furthermore, CR integration and CR innovation seem to have more potential for long‐term positive business outcomes than philanthrop...

95 citations

Book
01 Mar 2013
TL;DR: For example, Dauvergne and Lister as mentioned in this paper show that the ecoefficiencies achieved by big-brand companies limit the potential for finding deeper solutions to pressing environmental problems and reinforce runaway consumption.
Abstract: Two experts explain the consequences for the planet when corporations use sustainability as a business tool. McDonald's promises to use only beef, coffee, fish, chicken, and cooking oil obtained from sustainable sources. Coca-Cola promises to achieve water neutrality. Unilever seeks to achieve 100 percent sustainable agricultural sourcing by 2020. Walmart has pledged to become carbon neutral. Big-brand companies seem to be making commitments that go beyond the usual "greenwashing" efforts undertaken largely for public-relations purposes. In Eco-Business, Peter Dauvergne and Jane Lister examine this new corporate embrace of sustainability, its actual accomplishments, and the consequences for the environment. For many leading-brand companies, these corporate sustainability efforts go deep, reorienting central operations and extending through global supply chains. Yet, as Dauvergne and Lister point out, these companies are doing this not for the good of the planet but for their own profits and market share in a volatile, globalized economy. They are using sustainability as a business tool. Dauvergne and Lister show that the eco-efficiencies achieved by big-brand companies limit the potential for finding deeper solutions to pressing environmental problems and reinforce runaway consumption. Eco-business promotes the sustainability of big business, not the sustainability of life on Earth.

94 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Competitive advantage
46.6K papers, 1.5M citations
85% related
Corporate governance
118.5K papers, 2.7M citations
82% related
Sustainability
129.3K papers, 2.5M citations
81% related
Entrepreneurship
71.7K papers, 1.7M citations
80% related
Organizational learning
32.6K papers, 1.6M citations
79% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023147
2022261
2021321
2020349
2019334
2018300