scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Cost effectiveness

About: Cost effectiveness is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 69775 publications have been published within this topic receiving 1531477 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Cumulative costs for treatment of perioperative coagulation disorders can be reduced by "bedside" ROTEM analysis to achieve a selective substitution management and saved costs for blood- and coagulated products clearly outweighed the expenses of ROTem.
Abstract: Objective: Demographic changes and aggressive platelet inhibition have resulted in a marked increase in blood- and coagulation product expenditureand costs incardiac surgery. We analyzed‘bedside’coagulation test (ROTEM) inorderto verifyclot formingqualityfor thepurposeof finding a cost-effective treatment path. Methods: Annual treatment costs of all cardiosurgical patients were analyzed before (729 patients) and after (693 patients) implementation of ‘bedside’ ROTEM. Cumulative numbers and costs of platelet concentrates (PltC), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), red blood cell units (RBC), and coagulation factors: pooled coagulation concentrates (PCC), recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), factor XIII (FXIII), and fibrinogen were assessed. Average monthly numbers and costs were compared. Number of resternotomies and early mortality was assessed and compared in both periods. Results: After ROMTEM implementation cumulative RBC expenditure showed 25% decrease while PltC exhibited 50% decrease. FFP expenditure remained unchanged. PCC, FXIII were markedly reduced (80%) while rFVIIa were entirely omitted. Fibrinogen, however, increased two-fold. Cumulative average monthly costs of all blood products decreased from 66,000s to 45,000s (32%). Coagulation factor average monthly costs decreased from 60,000s to 30,000s (50%) yielding combined savings of 44%. In contrast, average monthly costs for ROTEM were 1.580s. Total number of resternotomies decreased from 6.6% to 5.5% while early mortality (5.9%; 6.0%) remained stable.Conclusion:Cumulativecostsfortreatmentofperioperativecoagulationdisorderscanbereducedby‘bedside’ROTEManalysisto achieve a selective substitution management. Saved costs for blood- and coagulation products clearly outweighed the expenses of ROTEM. Adequate differential coagulation management can therefore be cost-effective. # 2007 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

206 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Fazli Can1
TL;DR: Through empirical testing it is shown that the algorithm achieves cost effectiveness and generates statistically valid clusters that are compatible with those of reclustering.
Abstract: Clustering of very large document databases is useful for both searching and browsing. The periodic updating of clusters is required due to the dynamic nature of databases. An algorithm for incremental clustering is introduced. The complexity and cost analysis of the algorithm together with an investigation of its expected behavior are presented. Through empirical testing it is shown that the algorithm achieves cost effectiveness and generates statistically valid clusters that are compatible with those of reclustering. The experimental evidence shows that the algorithm creates an effective and efficient retrieval environment.

206 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Routine HPV testing did not add significantly to the effectiveness of LBC in this study, and it would not be cost-effective to screen with cytology and HPV combined but HPV testing, as either triage or initial test triaged by cytology, would be cheaper than cytology without HPV testing.
Abstract: Objectives: Primary cervical screening uses cytology to detect cancer precursor lesions [cervical intraepithelial neoplasia stage 3 or beyond (CIN3+)]. Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing could add sensitivity as an adjunct to cytology or as a first test, reserving cytology for HPV-positive women. This study addresses the questions: Does the combination of cytology and HPV testing achieve a reduction in incident CIN3+?; Is HPV testing cost-effective in primary cervical screening?; Is its use associated with adverse psychosocial or psychosexual effects?; and How would it perform as an initial screening test followed by cytology for HPV positivity? Design: ARTISTIC was a randomised trial of cervical cytology versus cervical cytology plus HPV testing, evaluated over two screening rounds, 3 years apart. Round 1 would detect prevalent disease and round 2 a combination of incident and undetected disease from round 1. Setting: Women undergoing routine cervical screening in the NHS programme in Greater Manchester. Participants: In total 24,5 10 women aged 20-64 years were enrolled between July 2001 and September 2003. Interventions: HPV testing was performed on the liquid-based cytology (LBC) sample obtained at screening. Women were randomised in a ratio of 3:1 to have the HPV test result revealed and acted upon if persistently positive in cytology-negative cases or concealed. A detailed health economic evaluation and a psychosocial and psychosexual assessment were also performed. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was CIN3+ in round 2. Secondary outcomes included an economic assessment and psychosocial effects. A large HPV genotyping study was also conducted. Results: In round 1 there were 313 CIN3+ lesions, representing a prevalence in the revealed and concealed arms of 1.27% and 1.31% respectively (p = 0.81). Round 2 (30-48 months) involved 14,230 (58.1%) of the women screened in round 1 and only 31 CIN3+ were detected; the CIN3 rate was not significantly different between the revealed and concealed arms. A less restrictive definition of round 2 (26-54 months) increased CIN3+ to 45 and CIN3+ incidence in the arms was significantly different (p = 0.05). There was no difference in CIN3+ between the arms when rounds 1 and 2 were combined. Prevalence of high-risk HPV types was age-dependent. Overall prevalence of HPV 16/18 increased with severity of dyskaryosis. Mean costs per woman in round 1 were 72 pound and 56 pound for the revealed and concealed arms (p < 0.001); an age-adjustment reduced these mean costs to 65 pound and 52 pound. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for detecting additional CIN3+ by adding HPV testing to LBC screening in round 1 was 8,771 pound. Age-adjusted mean cost for LBC primary screening with HPV triage was 39 pound compared with 48 pound for HPV primary screening with LBC triage. HPV testing did not appear to cause significant psychosocial distress. Conclusions: Routine HPV testing did not add significantly to the effectiveness of LBC in this study. No significant adverse psychosocial effects were detected. It would not be cost-effective to screen with cytology and HPV combined but HPV testing, as either triage or initial test triaged by cytology, would be cheaper than cytology without HPV testing. LBC would not benefit from combination with HPV, it is highly effective as primary screening but HPV testing has twin advantages of high negative predictive value and automated platforms enabling high throughput. HPV primary screening would require major contraction and reconfiguration of laboratory services. Follow-up continues in ARTISTIC while maintaining concealment for a further 3-year round of screening, which will help in screening protocol development for the post-vaccination era.

206 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Harvard University1, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich2, Heidelberg University3, University of Greifswald4, Robert Koch Institute5, Hannover Medical School6, Scripps Health7, Tufts University8, Leibniz University of Hanover9, University of Hamburg10, University of Kiel11, Vancouver General Hospital12, University of New Mexico13, Saint Louis University14, Oregon Health & Science University15, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai16, University of Paris17, University of Virginia18, Cleveland Clinic19, University of Washington20, University of Florida21, University of Nebraska Omaha22, Autonomous University of Barcelona23, University of Colorado Denver24, University of Toronto25, Northwestern University26, University of Mainz27, California Pacific Medical Center28, Emory University29, University of Cologne30, Beaumont Hospital31, Uppsala University32, Cornell University33, Indiana University34, University of Iowa35, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center36, Lund University37, University of Southern California38, London Health Sciences Centre39, Pennsylvania State University40, Veterans Health Administration41, Ochsner Health System42, University of Pittsburgh43, Complutense University of Madrid44, University of Barcelona45, University of Miami46, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg47, Toronto General Hospital48, Virginia Commonwealth University49, Fundación Favaloro50, Innsbruck Medical University51, University of California, San Francisco52, Goethe University Frankfurt53
01 Mar 2003-Gut
TL;DR: Peginterferon α-2b plus ribavirin should reduce the incidence of liver complications, prolong life, improve quality of life, and be cost effective for the initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C.
Abstract: Background: Peginterferon α-2b plus ribavirin therapy in previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C yields the highest sustained virological response rates of any treatment strategy but is expensive. Aims: To estimate the cost effectiveness of treatment with peginterferon α-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon α-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Methods: Individual patient level data from a randomised clinical trial with peginterferon plus ribavirin were applied to a previously published and validated Markov model to project lifelong clinical outcomes. Quality of life and economic estimates were based on German patient data. We used a societal perspective and applied a 3% annual discount rate. Results: Compared with no antiviral therapy, peginterferon plus fixed or weight based dosing of ribavirin increased life expectancy by 4.2 and 4.7 years, respectively. Compared with standard interferon α-2b plus ribavirin, peginterferon plus fixed or weight based dosing of ribavirin increased life expectancy by 0.5 and by 1.0 years with incremental cost effectiveness ratios of €11 800 and €6600 per quality adjusted life year (QALY), respectively. Subgroup analyses by genotype, viral load, sex, and histology showed that peginterferon plus weight based ribavirin remained cost effective compared with other well accepted medical treatments. Conclusions: Peginterferon α-2b plus ribavirin should reduce the incidence of liver complications, prolong life, improve quality of life, and be cost effective for the initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

205 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The evidence on the effectiveness of drotrecogin alfa (activated) for the treatment of severe sepsis came primarily from one large pivotal randomised controlled trial, the PROWESS study, which demonstrated a statistically significant absolute reduction in 28-day mortality.
Abstract: Objectives To assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of drotrecogin alfa (activated) for the treatment of adults with severe sepsis in a UK context. Data sources Electronic databases. Data from the commercial use of the drug up to April 2002. Data from the manufacturer submission to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Review methods A systematic review of the literature and an economic evaluation were undertaken. Data were synthesised through a narrative review with full tabulation of results from included studies. Results The evidence on the effectiveness of drotrecogin alfa (activated) for the treatment of severe sepsis came primarily from one large pivotal randomised controlled trial, the PROWESS study. This study demonstrated a statistically significant absolute reduction in 28-day mortality of 6.5%. Longer term survival benefit was maintained to 90 days. By 9 months, the trend towards increased median survival was non-significant, although the survival curves did not cross. Results presented by the number of organ dysfunctions were not statistically significant, but when mortality rates for those with two or more organ failures were combined, the relative risk of death was significantly lower in those treated with drotrecogin alfa (activated) compared with placebo. However, this report highlights a number of considerations relevant to the subgroup analyses reported for the PROWESS study. Published cost-effectiveness studies of treatment with drotrecogin alfa (activated) have applied a range of methods to the estimation of benefits, estimating an incremental gain per treated patient of between 0.38 and 0.68 life-years (for patients with severe sepsis). For patients with severe sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction, the manufacturer (Eli Lilly) estimated an incremental gain of 1.115 life-years per treated patient, compared to 1.351 life-years per treated patient estimated by the Southampton Health Technology Assessments Centre (SHTAC). These latter UK analyses are based on a patient group that is more severely affected by disease, where effectiveness is greater and the baseline risk of all-cause mortality is much higher (SHTAC analysis), these factors are associated with the noted difference in effect. The three published cost-effectiveness studies report cost for US and Canadian patient groups; for those patients with severe sepsis they report the additional cost per patient treated in a range around 10,000-16,000 dollars. The manufacturer's submission reports analysis for the UK, based on 28-day survival data in patients with severe sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction (the European licence indication), with the additional mean cost per treated patient estimated to be 5106 pounds. The analysis undertaken by SHTAC, for a UK group of patients with severe sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction, estimates an additional mean cost per patient treated of 6661 pounds. The manufacturer's submission to NICE presents cost-effectiveness estimates for drotrecogin alfa (activated) in the UK, in patients with severe sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction, at 6637 pounds per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) based on 28-day effectiveness data, and 10,937 pounds per QALY based on longer term follow-up data. SHTAC developed an independent cost-effectiveness model and estimated a base-case cost per QALY of 8228 pounds in patients with severe sepsis and multiple organ failure (based on 28-day survival data). Simulation results indicate that where the NHS is willing to pay 20,000 pounds per QALY, drotrecogin alfa (activated) is a cost-effective use of resources in 98.7% of cases. Published economic evaluations report various sensitivity analyses, with results sensitive to changes in the measure of treatment effect, but otherwise studies reported that results were robust to variations in most assumptions used in the cost-effectiveness analysis. Conclusions Drotrecogin alfa (activated) plus best supportive care appears clinically and cost-effective compared with best supportive care alone, in a UK cohort of severe sepsis patients, and in the subgroup of more severely affected patients with severe sepsis and multiple organ failure. The introduction of drotrecogin alfa (activated) will involve a substantial additional cost to the NHS. The treatment-eligible population in England and Wales may comprise up to 16,570 patients, with an estimated annual drug acquisition cost of over 80 million pounds, excluding VAT. Further research is required on the longer term impact of drotrecogin alfa (activated) on both mortality and morbidity in UK patients with severe sepsis, on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in children (under 18 years) with severe sepsis, and on the effect of the timing of dosage and duration of treatment on outcomes in severe sepsis.

205 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Psychological intervention
82.6K papers, 2.6M citations
76% related
Health care
342.1K papers, 7.2M citations
74% related
Randomized controlled trial
119.8K papers, 4.8M citations
73% related
Cohort study
58.9K papers, 2.8M citations
73% related
Risk factor
91.9K papers, 5.7M citations
72% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023307
2022768
20213,022
20202,908
20192,945
20182,994