Topic
Cost effectiveness
About: Cost effectiveness is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 69775 publications have been published within this topic receiving 1531477 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: Screening HIV-positive homosexual and bisexual men for ASIL and anal SCC with anal Pap tests offers quality-adjusted life expectancy benefits at a cost comparable with other accepted clinical preventive interventions.
Abstract: ContextHomosexual and bisexual men infected with human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are at increased risk for human
papillomavirus–related anal neoplasia and anal squamous cell carcinoma
(SCC).ObjectiveTo estimate the clinical benefits and
cost-effectiveness of screening HIV-positive homosexual and bisexual
men for anal squamous intraepithelial lesions (ASIL) and anal SCC.DesignCost-effectiveness analysis performed from a societal
perspective that used reference case recommendations from the Panel on
Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. A state-transition Markov
model was developed to calculate lifetime costs, life expectancy, and
quality-adjusted life expectancy for no screening vs several screening
strategies for ASIL and anal SCC using anal Papanicolaou (Pap) testing
at different intervals. Values for incidence, progression, and
regression of anal neoplasia; efficacy of screening and treatment;
natural history of HIV; health-related quality of life; and costs were
obtained from the literature.Setting and ParticipantsHypothetical cohort of homosexual and
bisexual HIV-positive men living in the United States.Main Outcome MeasuresLife expectancy, quality-adjusted life
expectancy, quality-adjusted years of life saved, lifetime costs, and
incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.ResultsScreening for ASIL increased quality-adjusted life
expectancy at all stages of HIV disease. Screening with anal Pap tests
every 2 years, beginning in early HIV disease (CD4 cell count
>0.50×109/L), resulted in a 2.7-month
gain in quality-adjusted life expectancy for an incremental
cost-effectiveness ratio of $13,000 per quality-adjusted life
year saved. Screening with anal Pap tests yearly provided additional
benefit at an incremental cost of $16,600 per quality-adjusted
life year saved. If screening was not initiated until later in the
course of HIV disease (CD4 cell count
<0.50×109/L), then yearly Pap test
screening was preferred due to the greater amount of prevalent anal
disease (cost-effectiveness ratio of less than $25,000 per
quality-adjusted life year saved compared with no screening). Screening
every 6 months provided little additional benefit over that of yearly
screening. Results were most sensitive to the rate of progression of
ASIL to anal SCC and the effectiveness of treatment of precancerous
lesions.ConclusionsScreening HIV-positive homosexual and bisexual men for
ASIL and anal SCC with anal Pap tests offers quality-adjusted life
expectancy benefits at a cost comparable with other accepted clinical
preventive interventions.
409 citations
••
TL;DR: Regardless of disease severity, improvements in the efficiency of bladder cancer care to limit unnecessary interventions and optimize effective cancer treatment can reduce overall health care costs.
409 citations
••
TL;DR: Addition of tomosynthesis to digital mammography offers the dual benefit of significantly increased diagnostic accuracy and significantly reduced recall rates for noncancer cases.
Abstract: The addition of tomosynthesis to digital mammography offers the dual benefit of improved diagnostic accuracy and significant reduction in false-positive recall rate, thereby avoiding unnecessary additional testing and decreasing attendant anxiety, inconvenience, and cost for women.
408 citations
••
TL;DR: A summary of flavonoids and their effectiveness in cancer treatment targeting apoptosis has been discussed and their high bioavailability, safety, minimal side effects and cost effectiveness are discussed.
Abstract: Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally. Although, there are many different approaches to cancer treatment, they are often painful due to adverse side effects and are sometimes ineffective due to increasing resistance to classical anti-cancer drugs or radiation therapy. Targeting delayed/inhibited apoptosis is a major approach in cancer treatment and a highly active area of research. Plant derived natural compounds are of major interest due to their high bioavailability, safety, minimal side effects and, most importantly, cost effectiveness. Flavonoids have gained importance as anti-cancer agents and have shown great potential as cytotoxic anti-cancer agents promoting apoptosis in cancer cells. In this review, a summary of flavonoids and their effectiveness in cancer treatment targeting apoptosis has been discussed.
407 citations
••
TL;DR: Treatment of secondary IFX failure using an algorithm based on combined IFX and IFX antibody measurements significantly reduces average treatment costs per patient compared with routine IFX dose escalation and without any apparent negative effect on clinical efficacy.
Abstract: Objective Although the reasons for secondary loss of response to infliximab (IFX) maintenance therapy in Crohn’s disease vary, dose intensification is usually recommended. This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of interventions defined by an algorithm designed to identify specific reasons for therapeutic failure. Design Randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre study. 69 patients with secondary IFX failure were randomised to IFX dose intensification (5 mg/kg every 4 weeks) (n=36) or interventions based on serum IFX and IFX antibody levels using the proposed algorithm (n=33). Predefined co-primary end points at week 12 were proportion of patients responding (Crohn9s Disease Activity Index (CDAI) decrease ≥70, or ≥50% reduction in active fistulas) and accumulated costs related to treatment of Crohn’s disease, expressed as mean cost per patient, based on the Danish National Patient Registry for all hospitalisation and outpatient costs in the Danish healthcare sector. Results Costs for intention-to-treat patients were substantially lower (34%) for those treated in accordance with the algorithm than by IFX dose intensification: €6038 vs €9178, p Conclusions Treatment of secondary IFX failure using an algorithm based on combined IFX and IFX antibody measurements significantly reduces average treatment costs per patient compared with routine IFX dose escalation and without any apparent negative effect on clinical efficacy. Trial Registration No NCT00851565.
406 citations