About: Crossover is a(n) research topic. Over the lifetime, 15599 publication(s) have been published within this topic receiving 283676 citation(s).
Papers published on a yearly basis
••04 May 1998
TL;DR: A new parameter, called inertia weight, is introduced into the original particle swarm optimizer, which resembles a school of flying birds since it adjusts its flying according to its own flying experience and its companions' flying experience.
Abstract: Evolutionary computation techniques, genetic algorithms, evolutionary strategies and genetic programming are motivated by the evolution of nature. A population of individuals, which encode the problem solutions are manipulated according to the rule of survival of the fittest through "genetic" operations, such as mutation, crossover and reproduction. A best solution is evolved through the generations. In contrast to evolutionary computation techniques, Eberhart and Kennedy developed a different algorithm through simulating social behavior (R.C. Eberhart et al., 1996; R.C. Eberhart and J. Kennedy, 1996; J. Kennedy and R.C. Eberhart, 1995; J. Kennedy, 1997). As in other algorithms, a population of individuals exists. This algorithm is called particle swarm optimization (PSO) since it resembles a school of flying birds. In a particle swarm optimizer, instead of using genetic operators, these individuals are "evolved" by cooperation and competition among the individuals themselves through generations. Each particle adjusts its flying according to its own flying experience and its companions' flying experience. We introduce a new parameter, called inertia weight, into the original particle swarm optimizer. Simulations have been done to illustrate the significant and effective impact of this new parameter on the particle swarm optimizer.
TL;DR: GA's population-based approach and ability to make pair-wise comparison in tournament selection operator are exploited to devise a penalty function approach that does not require any penalty parameter to guide the search towards the constrained optimum.
Abstract: Many real-world search and optimization problems involve inequality and/or equality constraints and are thus posed as constrained optimization problems. In trying to solve constrained optimization problems using genetic algorithms (GAs) or classical optimization methods, penalty function methods have been the most popular approach, because of their simplicity and ease of implementation. However, since the penalty function approach is generic and applicable to any type of constraint (linear or nonlinear), their performance is not always satisfactory. Thus, researchers have developed sophisticated penalty functions specific to the problem at hand and the search algorithm used for optimization. However, the most difficult aspect of the penalty function approach is to find appropriate penalty parameters needed to guide the search towards the constrained optimum. In this paper, GA's population-based approach and ability to make pair-wise comparison in tournament selection operator are exploited to devise a penalty function approach that does not require any penalty parameter. Careful comparisons among feasible and infeasible solutions are made so as to provide a search direction towards the feasible region. Once sufficient feasible solutions are found, a niching method (along with a controlled mutation operator) is used to maintain diversity among feasible solutions. This allows a real-parameter GA's crossover operator to continuously find better feasible solutions, gradually leading the search near the true optimum solution. GAs with this constraint handling approach have been tested on nine problems commonly used in the literature, including an engineering design problem. In all cases, the proposed approach has been able to repeatedly find solutions closer to the true optimum solution than that reported earlier.
TL;DR: A real-coded crossover operator is developed whose search power is similar to that of the single-point crossover used in binary-coded GAs, and SBX is found to be particularly useful in problems having mult ip le optimal solutions with a narrow global basin where the lower and upper bo unds of the global optimum are not known a priori.
Abstract: Abst ract . T he success of binary-coded gene t ic algorithms (GA s) in problems having discrete sear ch space largely depends on the coding used to represent the prob lem var iables and on the crossover ope ra tor that propagates buildin g blocks from parent strings to children st rings . In solving optimization problems having continuous search space, binary-coded GAs discr et ize the search space by using a coding of the problem var iables in binary strings. However , t he coding of realvalued vari ables in finit e-length st rings causes a number of difficulties: inability to achieve arbit rary pr ecision in the obtained solution , fixed mapping of problem var iab les, inh eren t Hamming cliff problem associated wit h binary coding, and processing of Holland 's schemata in cont inuous search space. Although a number of real-coded GAs are developed to solve optimization problems having a cont inuous search space, the search powers of these crossover operators are not adequate . In t his paper , t he search power of a crossover operator is defined in terms of the probability of creating an arbitrary child solut ion from a given pair of parent solutions . Motivated by the success of binarycoded GAs in discrete search space problems , we develop a real-coded crossover (which we call the simulated binar y crossover , or SBX) operator whose search power is similar to that of the single-point crossover used in binary-coded GAs . Simulation results on a nu mber of realvalued test problems of varying difficulty and dimensionality suggest t hat the real-cod ed GAs with the SBX operator ar e ab le to perfor m as good or bet ter than binary-cod ed GAs wit h the single-po int crossover. SBX is found to be particularly useful in problems having mult ip le optimal solutions with a narrow global basin an d in prob lems where the lower and upper bo unds of the global optimum are not known a priori. Further , a simulation on a two-var iable blocked function shows that the real-coded GA with SBX work s as suggested by Goldberg
••01 Apr 1994
TL;DR: An efficient approach for multimodal function optimization using genetic algorithms (GAs) and the use of adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation to realize the twin goals of maintaining diversity in the population and sustaining the, convergence capacity of the GA are described.
Abstract: In this paper we describe an efficient approach for multimodal function optimization using genetic algorithms (GAs). We recommend the use of adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation to realize the twin goals of maintaining diversity in the population and sustaining the, convergence capacity of the GA. In the adaptive genetic algorithm (AGA), the probabilities of crossover and mutation, p/sub c/ and p/sub m/, are varied depending on the fitness values of the solutions. High-fitness solutions are 'protected', while solutions with subaverage fitnesses are totally disrupted. By using adaptively varying p/sub c/ and p/sub ,/ we also provide a solution to the problem of deciding the optimal values of p/sub c/ and p/sub m/, i.e., p/sub c/ and p/sub m/ need not be specified at all. The AGA is compared with previous approaches for adapting operator probabilities in genetic algorithms. The Schema theorem is derived for the AGA, and the working of the AGA is analyzed. We compare the performance of the AGA with that of the standard GA (SGA) in optimizing several nontrivial multimodal functions with varying degrees of complexity. >
01 Jun 1989
Trending Questions (4)