Cycloaddition

About: Cycloaddition is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 39904 publications have been published within this topic receiving 728711 citations. The topic is also known as: Cycloaddition reaction.

Asymmetric Syntheses of Oxindoleand Indole Spirocyclic Alkaloid Natural Products

Abstract: This review highlights the advances in the literature up to May2009 in the synthesis of spirocyclic indoline natural products. Thefocus is on formation of the spirocyclic chiral center, including bothenantioselective and diastereoselective methods. This review issplit into two main sections, the first consisting of the formation ofspirooxindoles and their application towards oxindole alkaloids, andthe second covering asymmetric synthesis of spiroindoline naturalproducts. 1 Introduction 2 Spirooxindole Alkaloids 2.1 Oxidative Rearrangements 2.2 Azomethine Ylide Cycloaddition 2.3 Asymmetric Addition-Elimination 2.4 Palladium-Catalyzed Heck Reactions 2.5 Palladium-Catalyzed Allylic Alkylation 2.6 Ring Expansion 2.7 Mannich Reaction 3 Spiroindoline Alkaloids 3.1 Palladium Catalyzed Asymmetric Allylic Alkylation 3.2 [4+2] Cycloaddition 3.3 Oxidative Rearrangement 3.4 Diastereoselective Pummerer Rearrangement 3.5 Tandem Iminium Cascade 3.6 Fischer Indole Synthesis 3.6.1 Diastereoselective Ring-Closing Metathesis 3.6.2 Diastereoselective Alkylation of Chiral Lactams 3.6.3 Regioselective Schmidt Reaction 3.6.4 Diastereoselective Ketene Lactonization 3.6.5 Harley-Mason Reaction 3.6.6 S N 2-Type Indole Alkylation 3.6.7 Aza-Cope-Mannich Rearrangement 4 Conclusion

Analysis and Optimization of Copper-Catalyzed Azide–Alkyne Cycloaddition for Bioconjugation

Abstract: Since its discovery in 2002, the copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC)[1] reaction—the most widely recognized example of click chemistry[2]—has been rapidly embraced for applications in myriad fields.[3] The attractiveness of this procedure (and its copper-free strained-alkyne variant[4]) stems from the selective reactivity of azides and alkynes only with each other. Because of the fragile nature and low concentrations at which biomolecules are often manipulated, bioconjugation presents significant challenges for any ligation methodology. Several different CuAAC procedures have been reported to address specific cases involving peptides, proteins, polynucleotides, and fixed cells, often with excellent results,[5] but also occasionally with somewhat less satisfying outcomes.[6] We describe here a generally applicable procedure that solves the most vexing click bioconjugation problems in our laboratory, and therefore should be of use in many other situations. The CuAAC reaction requires the copper catalyst, usually prepared with an appropriate chelating ligand,[7] to be maintained in the CuI oxidation state. Several years ago we developed a system featuring a sulfonated bathophenanthroline ligand,[8] which was optimized into a useful bioconjugation protocol.[9] A significant drawback was the catalyst’s acute oxygen sensitivity, requiring air-free techniques which can be difficult to execute when an inert-atmosphere glove box is unavailable or when sensitive biomolecules are used in small volumes of aqueous solution. We also introduced an electrochemical method to generate and protect catalytically active CuI–ligand species for CuAAC bioconjugation and synthetic coupling reactions with miminal effort to exclude air.[10] Under these conditions, no hydrogen peroxide was produced in the oxygen-scrubbing process, resulting in protein conjugates that were uncontaminated with oxidative byproducts. However, this solution is also practical only for the specialist with access to the proper equipment. Other protocols have employed copper(I) sources such as CuBr for labeling fixed cells[11] and synthesizing glycoproteins.[12] In these cases, the instability of CuI in air imposes a requirement for large excesses of Cu (greater than 4 mm) and ligand for efficient reactions, which raises concerns about protein damage or precipitation, plus the presence of residual metal after purification. The most convenient CuAAC procedure involves the use of an in situ reducing agent. Sodium ascorbate is the reductant of choice for CuAAC reactions in organic and materials synthesis, but is avoided in bioconjugation with a few exceptions.[13] Copper and sodium ascorbate have been shown to be detrimental to biological[14] and synthetic[15] polymers due to copper-mediated generation of reactive oxygen species.[16] Moreover, dehydroascorbate and other ascorbate byproducts can react with lysine amine and arginine guanidine groups, leading to covalent modification and potential aggregation of proteins.[6a,17] We hoped that solutions to these problems would allow ascorbate to be used in fast and efficient CuAAC reactions using micromolar concentration of copper in the presence of atmospheric oxygen. This has now been achieved, allowing demanding reactions to be performed with biomolecules of all types by the nonspecialist. For purposes of catalyst optimization and reaction screening, the fluorogenic coumarin azide 1 developed by Wang et al. has proven to be invaluable (Scheme 1).[18] The progress of cycloaddition reactions between mid-micromolar concentrations of azide and alkyne in aqueous buffers was followed by the increase in fluorescence at 470 nm upon formation of the triazole 2. Scheme 1 Top: Reaction used for screening CuAAC catalysts and conditions. Below: Accelerating ligand 3 and additive 4 used in these studies. DMSO=dimethylsulfoxide.

Ruthenium-catalyzed cycloaddition of alkynes and organic azides

Abstract: A convenient process for the regioselective synthesis of 1 ,5-disubstituted 1 ,2,3-triazoles and 1 ,4,5-trisubstituted 1 ,2,3-triazoles from organic azides and alkynes employs catalytic ruthenium.

Chiral bis(oxazoline) copper(II) complexes: versatile catalysts for enantioselective cycloaddition, Aldol, Michael, and carbonyl ene reactions.

Abstract: A bis(oxazoline) (box) copper(II) complex and its hydrated counterpart (1 and 2) function as enantioselective Lewis acid catalysts for carbocyclic and hetero Diels−Alder, aldol, Michael, ene, and amination reactions with substrates capable of chelation through six- and five-membered rings. X-ray crystallography of the chiral complexes reveals a propensity for the formation of distorted square planar or square pyramidal geometries. The sense of asymmetric induction is identical for all the processes catalyzed by [Cu((S,S)-t-Bu-box)](X)2 complexes 1 and 2 (X = OTf and SbF) resulting from the intervention of a distorted square planar catalyst-substrate binary complex. These catalyzed processes exhibit excellent temperature−selectivity profiles. Reactions catalyzed by [Cu(S,S-Ph-pybox)](SbF6)2 and their derived chelation complexes are also discussed.

Intramolecular dipolar cycloaddition reactions of azomethine ylides.

Abstract: It was in 1963 that Huisgen laid out the classification of 1,3-dipoles and the concepts for 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions, although it was not until 1976 that the first intramolecular 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction of an azomethine ylide was reported. Since then, impressive developments have been described in this area, with the establishment of various useful methods for the formation of azomethine ylides and the determination of the requirements for a successful intramolecular cycloaddition reaction. Use of this methodology for the synthesis of pyrrolidineand pyrrole-containing natural products has been expanding rapidly. This review aims to describe the background and mechanisms of azomethine ylide formation and intramolecular cycloaddition, giving a critical account including the very first example and covering to early 2005. It is hoped that this review will be a useful resource for chemists interested in cycloaddition reactions and will inspire further exciting developments in this area. Cycloaddition reactions are one of the most important class of reactions in synthetic chemistry. Within * Corresponding author. Tel: +44 (0)114 222 9428. Fax: +44 (0)114 222 9346. E-mail: i.coldham@sheffield.ac.uk. † University of Sheffield. ‡ Tripos Discovery Research Ltd. Iain Coldham (b. 1965) is a Reader in Organic Chemistry at the University of Sheffield. He obtained his undergraduate degree and Ph.D. from the University of Cambridge, completing his Ph.D. in 1989 under the supervision of Stuart Warren. After postdoctoral studies at the University of Texas with Philip Magnus, he joined the staff in 1991 at the University of Exeter, U.K. In 2003, he moved to the University of Sheffield where he is involved in research on chiral organolithium compounds and on dipolar cycloaddition reactions in synthetic organic chemistry.