scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Damages

About: Damages is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 9365 publications have been published within this topic receiving 89750 citations. The topic is also known as: compensation award.


Papers
More filters
Posted Content
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that economists ignore the possibility of hedonic adaptation (the idea that people bounce back from utility shocks) and provide longitudinal evidence that individuals who become disabled go on to exhibit recovery in mental wellbeing.
Abstract: Economics ignores the possibility of hedonic adaptation (the idea that people bounce back from utility shocks). This paper argues that economists are wrong to do so. It provides longitudinal evidence that individuals who become disabled go on to exhibit recovery in mental wellbeing. Adaptation to severe disability, however, is shown to be incomplete. The paper suggests ways to calculate the level of compensatory damages for the pain and suffering from disablement. Courts all over the world currently use ad hoc methods.

504 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
09 Sep 2011-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: The damage estimates provide a crucial but previously missing component of cost-benefit analyses to evaluate policies and management options intended to reduce species introductions and could be similarly employed to estimate damages in other countries or natural resource sectors.
Abstract: Reliable estimates of the impacts and costs of biological invasions are critical to developing credible management, trade and regulatory policies. Worldwide, forests and urban trees provide important ecosystem services as well as economic and social benefits, but are threatened by non-native insects. More than 450 non-native forest insects are established in the United States but estimates of broad-scale economic impacts associated with these species are largely unavailable. We developed a novel modeling approach that maximizes the use of available data, accounts for multiple sources of uncertainty, and provides cost estimates for three major feeding guilds of non-native forest insects. For each guild, we calculated the economic damages for five cost categories and we estimated the probability of future introductions of damaging pests. We found that costs are largely borne by homeowners and municipal governments. Wood- and phloemboring insects are anticipated to cause the largest economic impacts by annually inducing nearly $1.7 billion in local government expenditures and approximately $830 million in lost residential property values. Given observations of new species, there is a 32% chance that another highly destructive borer species will invade the U.S. in the next 10 years. Our damage estimates provide a crucial but previously missing component of cost-benefit analyses to evaluate policies and management options intended to reduce species introductions. The modeling approach we developed is highly flexible and could be similarly employed to estimate damages in other countries or natural resource sectors.

489 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change as discussed by the authors found that the need for extreme immediate action will not survive the substitution of discounting assumptions that are consistent with today's market place.
Abstract: How much and how fast should the globe reduce greenhouse-gas emissions? How should nations balance the costs of the reductions against the damages and dangers of climate change? This question has been addressed by the recent "Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change," which answers these questions clearly and unambiguously We need urgent, sharp, and immediate reductions in greenhouse-gas emissions An analysis of the "Stern Review" finds that these recommendations depend decisively on the assumption of a near-zero social discount rate The Review's unambiguous conclusions about the need for extreme immediate action will not survive the substitution of discounting assumptions that are consistent with today's market place

427 citations

Book
01 Jan 1991
TL;DR: Anderson and Leal as mentioned in this paper argue that the environment and the market are inextricably connected in a positive rather than negative way, and that individual property owners, who are in a position and have an incentive to obtain time and place-specific information about their resource endowments, are better suited than centralized bureaucracies to manage resources.
Abstract: Free Market Environmentalism by Terry L. Anderson and Donald R. Leal is a call to action rather than an empirical study. These authors argue that the environment and the market are inextricably connected in a positive rather than negative way. In their view, individual property owners, who are in a position and have an incentive to obtain time- and place-specific information about their resource endowments, are better suited than centralized bureaucracies to manage resources. Government should strive as much as possible to encourage and facilitate the working of the market through the enforcement of property rights, including clearly specified titles, strict liability rules and adjudication of disputed property rights in court. Markets could then be created in a variety of environmental policy domains. For example, Yellowstone National park currently has a problem with migrating bison who wander off the park premises and infect the cattle of adjoining ranches with deadly viruses. To Anderson and Leal, this problem could be solved if park officials owned the bison and could be sued for damages. Overfishing could be solved through the allocation of property rights to specific people who would be allowed to trade their rights. This property rights model is applied tomore » a wide variety of environmental circumstances and problems including land policy, outdoor recreation, energy development, groundwater pollution, garbage disposal, and global warming.« less

424 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a framework to include environmental externali- ties into a system of national accounts, and they estimate the air pollution damages for each industry in the United States.
Abstract: This study presents a framework to include environmental externali- ties into a system of national accounts. The paper estimates the air pollution damages for each industry in the United States. An inte- grated-assessment model quantifies the marginal damages of air pol- lution emissions for the US which are multiplied times the quantity of emissions by industry to compute gross damages. Solid waste com- bustion, sewage treatment, stone quarrying, marinas, and oil and coal-fired power plants have air pollution damages larger than their value added. The largest industrial contributor to external costs is coal-fired electric generation, whose damages range from 0.8 to 5.6 times value added. (JEL E01, L94, Q53, Q56)

420 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Government
141K papers, 1.9M citations
77% related
Public policy
76.7K papers, 1.6M citations
76% related
Risk assessment
43K papers, 1.1M citations
75% related
Environmental pollution
100.4K papers, 1.1M citations
74% related
Sustainable development
101.4K papers, 1.5M citations
74% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20242
2023929
20221,943
2021234
2020340
2019324