scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Debulking

About: Debulking is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 4583 publications have been published within this topic receiving 105786 citations. The topic is also known as: cytoreduction surgical procedure & cytoreduction.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery was not inferior to primary debulked surgery followed by chemotherapy as a treatment option for patients with bulky stage IIIC or IV ovarian carcinoma in this study.
Abstract: Of the 670 patients randomly assigned to a study treatment, 632 (94.3%) were eligible and started the treatment. The majority of these patients had extensive stage IIIC or IV disease at primary debulking surgery (metastatic lesions that were larger than 5 cm in diameter in 74.5% of patients and larger than 10 cm in 61.6%). The largest residual tumor was 1 cm or less in diameter in 41.6% of patients after primary debulking and in 80.6% of patients after interval debulking. Postoperative rates of adverse effects and mortality tended to be higher after primary debulking than after interval debulking. The hazard ratio for death (intention-to-treat analysis) in the group assigned to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking, as compared with the group assigned to primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy, was 0.98 (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.13; P = 0.01 for noninferiority), and the hazard ratio for progressive disease was 1.01 (90% CI, 0.89 to 1.15). Complete resection of all macroscopic disease (at primary or interval surgery) was the strongest independent variable in predicting overall survival. Conclusions Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery was not inferior to primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy as a treatment option for patients with bulky stage IIIC or IV ovarian carcinoma in this study. Complete resection of all macroscopic disease, whether performed as primary treatment or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, remains the objective whenever cytoreductive surgery is performed. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00003636.)

1,865 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of bevacizumab and paclitaxel on progression-free survival in patients with stage III or stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer.
Abstract: METHODS In our double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned eligible patients with newly diagnosed stage III (incompletely resectable) or stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer who had undergone debulking surgery to receive one of three treatments All three included chemotherapy consisting of intravenous paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg per square meter of body-surface area, plus carboplatin at an area under the curve of 6, for cycles 1 through 6, plus a study treatment for cycles 2 through 22, each cycle of 3 weeks’ duration The control treatment was chemotherapy with placebo added in cycles 2 through 22; bevacizumab-initiation treatment was che motherapy with bevacizumab (15 mg per kilogram of body weight) added in cycles 2 through 6 and placebo added in cycles 7 through 22 Bevacizumab-throughout treatment was chemotherapy with bevacizumab added in cycles 2 through 22 The primary end point was progression-free survival RESULTS Overall, 1873 women were enrolled The median progression-free survival was 103 months in the control group, 112 in the bevacizumab-initiation group, and 141 in the bevacizumab-throughout group Relative to control treatment, the hazard ratio for progression or death was 0908 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0795 to 1040; P = 016) with bevacizumab initiation and 0717 (95% CI, 0625 to 0824; P<0001) with bevacizumab throughout At the time of analysis, 763% of patients were alive, with no significant differences in overall survival among the three groups The rate of hypertension requiring medical therapy was higher in the bevacizumab-initiation group (165%) and the bevacizumab-throughout group (229%) than in the control group (72%) Gastrointestinal-wall disruption requiring medical intervention occurred in 12%, 28%, and 26% of patients in the control group, the bevacizumab-initiation group, and the bevacizumab-throughout group, respectively CONCLUSIONS The use of bevacizumab during and up to 10 months after carboplatin and pacli taxel chemotherapy prolongs the median progression-free survival by about 4 months in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and Genentech; ClinicalTrialsgov number, NCT00262847)

1,552 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: Clinical trials with hematoporphyrin derivative PDT in the sites mentioned are in progress and laboratory work to better understand HpD also continues, as well as investigations into alternative photosensitizers with improved tumor localization, less cutaneous photosensitivity, and absorption peaks at deeper penetrating wavelengths of light.
Abstract: PDT represents another modality for the treatment of human malignancy. Photoactivated hematoporphyrins have definite antitumor activity in both in vitro and in vivo experimental systems. Much of the early clinical work involved treatment of patients with advanced, recurrent disease who had not responded to conventional therapy. Because good responses with acceptable toxicity have been obtained in these patients, active investigation continued and is aimed at defining the most appropriate sites and applications for the technique. Because of the limited depth of light penetration in tissue, the most promising sites may be those where there is limited thickness of tumor, such as in superficial skin lesions or carcinomas in situ involving the aerodigestive tract, bronchial tree, or genitourinary tract. Other potential uses include those where PDT could be combined with surgical or chemotherapeutic debulking, such as pleural mesothelioma or advanced stage ovarian cancer. Whether PDT can be of benefit in surgical cases where the margins of resection are close is an interesting but speculative notion at the present time. Clinical trials with hematoporphyrin derivative PDT in the sites mentioned are in progress. Laboratory work to better understand HpD also continues, as well as investigations into alternative photosensitizers with improved tumor localization, less cutaneous photosensitivity, and absorption peaks at deeper penetrating wavelengths of light. Attempts at measuring singlet oxygen, if successful, will permit the development of more meaningful dosimetry in order to correlate response with actual tissue levels of the purported cytotoxic agent. Hopefully, these and other developments in the field of PDT will improve the treatment for patients with cancer.

1,175 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This multinational double-blind placebo-controlled trial was designed to evaluate the addition of bevacizumab to standard front-line ovarian cancer therapy in patients with stage III or IV epithelial ovarian cancer.
Abstract: METHODS In our double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned eligible patients with newly diagnosed stage III (incompletely resectable) or stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer who had undergone debulking surgery to receive one of three treatments. All three included chemotherapy consisting of intravenous paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg per square meter of body-surface area, plus carboplatin at an area under the curve of 6, for cycles 1 through 6, plus a study treatment for cycles 2 through 22, each cycle of 3 weeks’ duration. The control treatment was chemotherapy with placebo added in cycles 2 through 22; bevacizumab-initiation treatment was che motherapy with bevacizumab (15 mg per kilogram of body weight) added in cycles 2 through 6 and placebo added in cycles 7 through 22. Bevacizumab-throughout treatment was chemotherapy with bevacizumab added in cycles 2 through 22. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS Overall, 1873 women were enrolled. The median progression-free survival was 10.3 months in the control group, 11.2 in the bevacizumab-initiation group, and 14.1 in the bevacizumab-throughout group. Relative to control treatment, the hazard ratio for progression or death was 0.908 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.795 to 1.040; P = 0.16) with bevacizumab initiation and 0.717 (95% CI, 0.625 to 0.824; P<0.001) with bevacizumab throughout. At the time of analysis, 76.3% of patients were alive, with no significant differences in overall survival among the three groups. The rate of hypertension requiring medical therapy was higher in the bevacizumab-initiation group (16.5%) and the bevacizumab-throughout group (22.9%) than in the control group (7.2%). Gastrointestinal-wall disruption requiring medical intervention occurred in 1.2%, 2.8%, and 2.6% of patients in the control group, the bevacizumab-initiation group, and the bevacizumab-throughout group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The use of bevacizumab during and up to 10 months after carboplatin and pacli taxel chemotherapy prolongs the median progression-free survival by about 4 months in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and Genentech; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00262847.)

883 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Metastasis
103.6K papers, 3.4M citations
86% related
Survival rate
73.3K papers, 3.5M citations
85% related
Carcinoma
78.2K papers, 2.2M citations
84% related
Cancer
339.6K papers, 10.9M citations
84% related
Radiation therapy
76.3K papers, 2M citations
82% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023274
2022737
2021297
2020297
2019263
2018250