scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Direct stiffness method

About: Direct stiffness method is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 2584 publications have been published within this topic receiving 53131 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, an equivalent frame model is presented for the T-stub to predict the axial stiffness, designed for hand calculation, and the response is calculated analytically on the basis of a beam assembly representation for the flanges and the bolts.

35 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Direct Flexibility Method (DFM) as mentioned in this paper is based on a decomposition of the finite element model into substructures, which may reduce to individual elements, and is used for solving finite element equations.

35 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a new effective smeared stiffener method was developed to compute the global buckling load of grid stiffened composite panels, which gives appropriate consideration of the skin-stiffener interactions based on a proposed improved mechanical hypothesis.

35 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a variable stiffness mechanism is presented, which is capable of achieving an output stiffness with infinite range and an unlimited output motion, i.e., the mechanism output is completely decoupled from the rotor motion, in the zero stiffness configuration.
Abstract: In this paper, a novel variable stiffness mechanism is presented, which is capable of achieving an output stiffness with infinite range and an unlimited output motion, i.e., the mechanism output is completely decoupled from the rotor motion, in the zero stiffness configuration. The mechanism makes use of leaf springs, which are engaged at different positions by means of two movable supports, to realize the variable output stiffness. The Euler–Bernoulli leaf spring model is derived and validated through experimental data. By shaping the leaf springs, it is shown that the stiffness characteristic of the mechanism can be changed to fulfill different application requirements. Alternative designs can achieve the same behavior with only one leaf spring and one movable support pin.

35 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the same type of boundary matrices which have a clear physical interpretation are identified in the three boundary-element methods, each of which is illustrated with a simple static example.
Abstract: Starting from a weighted-residual formulation, the various boundary-element methods, i.e. the weighted-residual technique, the indirect boundary-element method and the direct boundary-element method, are systematically developed for the calculation of the dynamic-stiffness matrix of an embedded foundation. In all three methods, loads whose analytical response in the unbounded domain can be determined are introduced acting on the continuous soil towards the region to be excavated. In the weighted-residual technique and in the indirect boundary-element method, a weighting function is used; in the latter case, it is selected as the Green's function for the surface traction. In the direct boundary-element method, the surface traction along the structure-soil interface is interpolated. The same type of boundary matrices which have a clear physical interpretation are identified in the three formulations, each of which is illustrated with a simple static example. The indirect boundary-element method leads to the most accurate results. The guaranteed symmetry and the fact that the displacement arising from the applied loads can easily be calculated and compared to the prescribed displacement makes the indirect boundary-element method especially attractive for calculating the dynamic-stiffness matrix of the soil. Instead of calculating the dynamic-stiffness matrix of the embedded foundation with the boundary-element method, it can be determined as the difference of those of the regular free field and of the excavated part. The calculation of the former does not require the Green's function for the surface traction. The dynamic stiffness of the excavated part can be calculated by the finite-element method.

35 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Finite element method
178.6K papers, 3M citations
85% related
Constitutive equation
24.9K papers, 665.1K citations
85% related
Mixed finite element method
22.2K papers, 614.1K citations
84% related
Numerical analysis
52.2K papers, 1.2M citations
81% related
Vibration
80K papers, 849.3K citations
81% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202334
202270
202123
202022
201930
201842