scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers on "Disaster recovery published in 1987"


Journal Article

5 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The fires of Ash Wednesday, 1983 have been a significant turning-point in the history of disaster management concepts and practices in Australia and disaster recovery management has been identified as an important area of management in its own right.
Abstract: The fires of Ash Wednesday, 1983 have been a significant turning-point in the history of disaster management concepts and practices in Australia. Disaster recovery management has been identified as an important area of management in its own right, containing complex and prolonged programs and activities and requiring the participation of the affected community and involvement from the wide community. Recovery from disaster is no longer seen merely in terms of response and relief activities, or as a physical process of reconstruction. It is an enabling and supportive process, which allows individuals, families and communities to attain a proper level of functioning through the provision of information, resources and specialist services.

2 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: For example, Dynes as discussed by the authors argued that a disaster is an event, located in time and space, that produces conditions whereby the continuity of the structure and processes of social units becomes problematic.
Abstract: Understanding of what constitutes a disaster has altered over time in accordance with changing notions of cause and effects. The “Black Death” which swept Europe was then regarded as inevitable, with some religious groups descibing it as “An Act of God”. Perception of disaster has moved from an emphasis on the physical effects of an event, such as cyclone, fire or chemical explosion, to a perception that the extent of deleterious effects is predominately a social issue. “Sociologically, a disaster is an event, located in time and space, that produces conditions whereby the continuity of the structure and processes of social units becomes problematic. Disaster agents may differ as to their cause, frequency, controllability, speed and onset, length of forewarning, duration, scope of impact and destructive potential” (Dynes, 1975).