scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Discourse analysis

About: Discourse analysis is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 16055 publications have been published within this topic receiving 515384 citations. The topic is also known as: DA & discourse studies.


Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 1996
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on three themes on which they would like to focus attention, whose full incorporation into the analysis of discourse is, in their view, critical for its optimum further development.
Abstract: There are three themes on which I would like to focus attention, whose full incorporation into the analysis of discourse is, in my view, critical for its optimum further development. What needs to be incorporated is an orientation 1) to action, 2) to interaction, and 3) to multi-party interaction. It will turn out that orientation to each of these themes confronts the student of discourse with a sort of challenge whose depth and consequentiality has not yet been fully registered or explored, but is likely to be substantial. What becomes inescapable in facing up to action, interaction and multi-party interaction is the challenge of contingency. What exactly I mean by “contingency” will only come into view over the course of the discussion of empirical materials; as it cannot be usefully elaborated here, I will return to the import of contingency at the end.

123 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors examined how consumers construct their luxury brand consumption amidst countervailing cultural discourses in the market (Thompson and Haytko) and found that respondents construct an ostensibly distinct and stable version of luxury expressing its subjective, experiential, moral and artistic constructs.
Abstract: Purpose – The aim of this paper is to offer a discursive perspective on luxury brand consumptionDesign/methodology/approach – Discourse analysis is used to examine how consumers construct their luxury brand consumption amidst countervailing cultural discourses in the market (Thompson and Haytko) Consumer discourse is generated through in‐depth, semi‐structured interviewsFindings – In the context of countervailing discourses that challenge the notion of luxury (eg “masstige”, “chav” and “bling”), respondents construct an ostensibly distinct and stable version of luxury expressing its subjective, experiential, moral and artistic constructs Analysis demonstrates how these four themes operate at a linguistic‐textual level to delineate important cultural categories and boundaries around luxury Luxury brand discourse operates strategic juxtapositions between normatively positive (ideal) and normatively negative (problematic) categories, which are paradoxically interdependentResearch limitations/implicat

123 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a theoretical model of dyadic native-nonnative speaker (NS-NNS) discourse is proposed in which discourse is described in terms of three features: interactional contingency, the goal orientation of participants, and dominance.
Abstract: In this paper a theoretical model of dyadic native-nonnative speaker (NS-NNS) discourse is proposed in which discourse is described in terms of three features: interactional contingency, the goal orientation of participants, and dominance. The model is then used to study the discourse of 30 dyadic oral interviews of the Cambridge First Certificate in English examination. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of the model in abstracting the structure of oral interview discourse. They show that the discourse of oral proficiency interviews is characterized by greater reactiveness by NNS candidates and greater orientation toward goals by NS examiners. Variation in the structure of the discourse is also investigated in this study. This is shown to be related to the examiner, the theme of the interview, the task in which the participants are engaged, and the gender of examiner and candidate.

123 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors traces the evolution of scientific research writing in English from 1675 to 1975 using discourse analysis and sociolinguistic register analysis, finding that research writing was substantially influenced by communicative norms of author-centered genteel conduct, greater attention to methodology and precision in the interest of scientific specialization brought about pronounced textual changes in the 19th century, although gentlemanly norms were still in evidence.
Abstract: This study traces the evolution of scientific research writing in English from 1675 to 1975. Two separate methods of discourse analysis – rhetorical analysis focusing on broad genre characteristics, and sociolinguistic register analysis – are applied to a large corpus of articles from the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. The two sets of results are then interpreted vis-a-vis the Royal Society's social history to yield an integrated description. Findings indicate that: (a) research writing in the 17th – 18th centuries was substantially influenced by communicative norms of author-centered genteel conduct; (b) greater attention to methodology and precision in the interest of scientific specialization brought about pronounced textual changes in the 19th century, although gentlemanly norms were still in evidence; and (c) by the late 20th century, expanded theoretical description/discussions appear to have replaced experiments and methods as the rhetorical centerpiece of the research article. (Discourse analysis, rhetorical analysis, register, social studies of science, scientific writing, corpus linguistics)

122 citations

01 Jan 1995
TL;DR: This paper investigated the teaching of conversational English implicature of 126 Japanese English-as-a-foreign-Language (EFL) learners and found that teaching implicatures through explicit explanations of rules and consciousness-raising tasks is highly facilitative, amount of time and exposure to the pragmatic system may be a crucial factor to induction.
Abstract: As teaching pragmatic competence is considered to be one of the neglected aspects in English language teaching in Japan, this paper investigates the teaching of conversational English implicature of 126 Japanese English-as-a-Foreign-Language (EFL) learners. University student participants were divided into three groups and given a multiple choice test and a sentence-combining test. In one group, the explanations of rules were given by a teacher; in the second, consciousness-raising tasks evolved from group discussion. The third group was a control. All subjects received a pre-test and two post-tests. Results indicate that experimental groups generated significantly better responses. In addition, no subjects extracted the expected pragmatic generalizations from the treatment that they were applying to the new items. Also, the conscious-raising groups performed better in the post-test than in the pre-test, and they had significantly higher scores in the guessing of items on the first post-test than the pre-test. Results confirm that teaching conversational implicature through explicit explanations of rules and consciousness-raising tasks is highly facilitative, amount of time and exposure to the pragmatic system may be a crucial factor to induction, and it may be advantageous for learners to process language on their own through consciousness-raising tasks. (Contains 20 references.) (Author/NAV) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** Teachability of Conversational Implicature to Japanese EFL Learners ccn

122 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Educational research
38.5K papers, 1.3M citations
83% related
Experiential learning
63.4K papers, 1.6M citations
82% related
Higher education
244.3K papers, 3.5M citations
81% related
Qualitative research
39.9K papers, 2.3M citations
80% related
Social change
61.1K papers, 1.7M citations
80% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023216
2022394
2021632
2020851
2019833
2018803