scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Dosage compensation

About: Dosage compensation is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 1920 publications have been published within this topic receiving 124589 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 1989-Genetics
TL;DR: A genetic characterization of several essential components of the dosage compensation process in Caenorhabditis elegans suggests that dosage compensation is functioning in XX animals by mid-embryogenesis, when many zygotically transcribed genes are active.
Abstract: We report a genetic characterization of several essential components of the dosage compensation process in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mutations in the genes dpy-26, dpy-27, dpy-28, and the newly identified gene dpy-29 disrupt dosage compensation, resulting in elevated X-linked gene expression in XX animals and an incompletely penetrant maternal-effect XX-specific lethality. These dpy mutations appear to cause XX animals to express each set of X-linked genes at a level appropriate for XO animals. XO dpy animals are essentially wild type. Both the viability and the level of X-linked gene expression in XX animals carrying mutations in two or more dpy genes are the same as in animals carrying only a single mutation, consistent with the view that these genes act together in a single process (dosage compensation). To define a potential time of action for the gene dpd-28 we performed reciprocal temperature-shift experiments with a heat sensitive allele. The temperature-sensitive period for lethality begins 5 hr after fertilization at the 300-cell stage and extends to about 9 hr, a point well beyond the end of cell proliferation. This temperature-sensitive period suggests that dosage compensation is functioning in XX animals by mid-embryogenesis, when many zygotically transcribed genes are active. While mutations in the dpy genes have no effect on the sexual phenotype of otherwise wild-type XX or XO animals, they do have a slight feminizing effect on animals whose sex-determination process is already genetically perturbed. The opposite directions of the feminizing effects on sex determination and the masculinizing effects on dosage compensation caused by the dpy mutations are inconsistent with the wild-type dpy genes acting to coordinately control both processes. Instead, the feminizing effects are most likely an indirect consequence of disruptions in dosage compensation caused by the dpy mutations. Based on the cumulative evidence, the likely mechanism of dosage compensation in C. elegans involves reducing X-linked gene expression in XX animals to equal that in XO animals via the action of the dpy genes.

93 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
13 Jan 1995-Cell
TL;DR: It is suggested that assessment of the X/A ratio occurs only early in embryogenesis to determine sex and that sdc-2, a gene that must be repressed by xol-1 to ensure male development, may be a direct target of negative regulation by xOL-1.

93 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
12 Aug 2004-Oncogene
TL;DR: It is found that cancer cells (PSK-1) derived from a patient with Klinefelter syndrome (47XXY) showing loss of an inactive X chromosome subsequently gained active X chromosomes.
Abstract: The increased risk of several types of cancer in Klinefelter syndrome (47XXY) suggests that the extra X chromosome may be involved in the tumorigenesis associated with this syndrome. Here, we show that cancer cells (PSK-1) derived from a patient with Klinefelter syndrome (47XXY) showing loss of an inactive X chromosome subsequently gained active X chromosomes. We found that this abnormal X chromosome composition in PSK-1 is caused by a loss of an inactive X chromosome followed by multiplication of identical active X chromosomes, not by reactivation of an inactive X chromosome. Furthermore, we extended the characterization of loss-of-inactive X in a series of 22 female-derived cancer cell lines (eight breast cancer cell lines, seven ovarian cancer cell lines, and seven cervical cancer cell lines). The data demonstrate that loss-of-inactive X in the female-derived cancer cells is mainly achieved by loss of an inactive X chromosomes followed by multiplication of an identical active X chromosomes. However, distinctive pathways, including reactivation of an inactive X chromosome, are also involved in the mechanisms for loss-of-inactive X and gain-of-active X in female-derived cancer cells. The biological significance of the loss-of-inactive X and gain-of-active X in the oncogenesis of Klinefelter syndrome and female-derived cancer cells are discussed.

92 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The expression of the human homologue, XIST, in human preimplantation embryos from the 5- to 10-cell stage onwards consistent with its role in the initiation of inactivation is reported.
Abstract: In the somatic cells of female mammals, either the maternally or paternally derived X chromosome (X(M) or X(P)) is randomly inactivated to achieve dosage compensation for X-linked genes. In early mouse development, however, selective inactivation of X(P) occurs first in extraembryonic lineages at the blastocyst stage around the time of implantation before later random inactivation in the embryonic ectoderm from which the fetus is derived. Xist, a gene mapping to the X-inactivation centre (Xic), is exclusively expressed from the inactive X-chromosome and is thought to be involved in the initiation of X-inactivation. Consistent with this, Xist is first expressed at the 4-to 8-cell stages, prior to functional inactivation at the blastocyst stage, exclusively from X(P) in female embryos. This also suggests that genomic imprinting may influence the earliest expression of Xist resulting in selective inactivation of X(P) and a candidate methylation site in the promoter region has recently been described. Here we report the expression of the human homologue, XIST, in human preimplantation embryos from the 5- to 10-cell stage onwards consistent with its role in the initiation of inactivation. In contrast to the mouse, however, transcripts were detected in both male and female embryos demonstrating XIST expression from the X(M) in male embryos (X(M)Y).

92 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Aug 1994-Genetics
TL;DR: Dpy-30 mutations can dramatically influence the choice of sexual fate in animals with an ambiguous sexual identity, despite having no apparent effect on the sexual phenotype of otherwise wild-type animals, and reveal the complex regulatory relationship between the sex determination and dosage compensation processes.
Abstract: The need to regulate X chromosome expression in Caenorhabditis elegans arises as a consequence of the primary sex-determining signal, the X/A ratio (the ratio of X chromosomes to sets of autosomes), which directs 1X@A animals to develop as males and 2X/2A animals to develop as hermaphrodites. C. elegans possesses a dosage compensation mechanism that equalizes X chromosome expression between the two sexes despite their disparity in X chromosome dosage. Previous genetic analysis led to the identification of four autosomal genes, dpy-21, dpy-26, dpy-27 and dpy-28, whose products are essential in XX animals for proper dosage compensation, but not for sex determination. We report the identification and characterization of dpy-30, an essential component of the dosage compensation machinery. Putative null mutations in dpy-30 disrupt dosage compensation and cause a severe maternal-effect, XX-specific lethality. Rare survivors of the dpy-30 lethality are dumpy and express their X-linked genes at higher than wild-type levels. These dpy-30 mutant phenotypes superficially resemble those caused by mutations in dpy-26, dpy-27 and dpy-28; however, detailed phenotypic analysis reveals important differences that distinguish dpy-30 from these genes. In contrast to the XX-specific lethality caused by mutations in the other dpy genes, the XX-specific lethality caused by dpy-30 mutations is completely penetrant and temperature sensitive. In addition, unlike the other genes, dpy-30 is required for the normal development of XO animals. Although dpy-30 mutations do not significantly affect the viability of XO animals, they do cause them to be developmentally delayed and to possess numerous morphological and behavioral abnormalities. Finally, dpy-30 mutations can dramatically influence the choice of sexual fate in animals with an ambiguous sexual identity, despite having no apparent effect on the sexual phenotype of otherwise wild-type animals. Paradoxically, depending on the genetic background, dpy-30 mutations cause either masculinization or feminization, thus revealing the complex regulatory relationship between the sex determination and dosage compensation processes. The novel phenotypes caused by dpy-30 mutations suggest that in addition to acting in the dosage compensation process, dpy-30 may play a more general role in the development of both XX and XO animals.

92 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Chromatin
50.7K papers, 2.7M citations
88% related
Regulation of gene expression
85.4K papers, 5.8M citations
87% related
Gene
211.7K papers, 10.3M citations
87% related
Mutation
45.2K papers, 2.6M citations
86% related
Genome
74.2K papers, 3.8M citations
86% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202330
202272
202183
202051
201980
201870