scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Dredging

About: Dredging is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 3300 publications have been published within this topic receiving 28325 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal Article
TL;DR: A moderately developed tidal creek feeding the U.S. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway was closed to shellfishing for a number of years because of high fecal coliform counts as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: A moderately-developed tidal creek feeding the U.S. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway was closed to shellfishing for a number of years because of high fecal coliform counts. An investigation was unable to determine an anthropogenic source for the contamination. Because dung piles and other wild animal signs were concentrated in the most affected area of the creek animals were assumed to be a major source of the coliform pollution. Over the years a sandbar had accumulated across the mouth of the creek, impeding flow into the creek. A coalition consisting of a concerned citizen's group, local government, and university scientists obtained permits to conduct limited creek-mouth dredging to improve flushing and increase salinity in polluted areas. Following dredging, fecal coliform counts decreased 35 to 60% creek-wide, with greatest decreases in stations midway up the creek. Nitrate concentrations decreased significantly and turbidity increased significantly at two creek stations. A continuous monitor located midway up the creek recorded higher salinities and less intertidal salinity variability following dredging than before dredging. The North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries reopened the creek to shellfishing a year after dredging. While dredging proved to lower fecal coliform counts to acceptable levels, it did not remove the source of contamination; rather, it alleviated the symptoms.

12 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
19 Nov 2020-Water
TL;DR: In this paper, the anthropogenic sediment budget has been calculated as an algebraic sum of sediment inputs, outputs and transfer (m3) within a 40-year time interval (1980-2020).
Abstract: In the present study we describe a straightforward and highly replicable methodology to assess the anthropogenic sediment budget within a coastal system (the Northern Tuscany littoral cell, Italy), specifically selected in a partially natural and partially highly urbanized coastal area, characterized by erosion and accretion processes. The anthropogenic sediment budget has been here calculated as an algebraic sum of sediment inputs, outputs and transfer (m3) within a 40 year time interval (1980–2020). Sediment management strongly influences the sediment budget and, even if its evaluation is crucial to assess the efficiency of a coastal management policy, it is often difficult to quantify the anthropogenic contribution to sedimentary processes. Different types of intervention are carried out by a variety of competent authorities over time (Municipalities, Marinas, Port Authorities), and the correct accountability of sediment budget is no longer known, or possible, for the scientific community. In the Northern Tuscany littoral cell, sedimentation is concentrated in a convergent zone and updrift of port structures, which have determined a series of actions, from offshore dumping and disposal into confined facilities (sediment output), to bypassing and redistribution interventions (sediment transfer); conversely, river mouths and coastal areas protected by groins and barriers are subjected to severe erosion and coastline retreat, resulting in many beach nourishments (sediment input). The majority of coastal protection interventions were carried out to redistribute sand from one site to another within the study area (2,949,800 m3), while the sediment input (1,011,000 m3) almost matched the sediment output (1,254,900 m3) in the considered time interval. A negative anthropogenic sediment budget (−243,900 m3) is here documented.

12 citations

Book
01 Jun 1970

12 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed recommendations to optimize the re-use of these sediments in considering technical, environmental and economical criteria, and a reuse process has been studied in laboratory and tested on field site.
Abstract: Across the world, every year, several millions of tons of sediments are dredged in harbours. These sediments, which are sometimes polluted, represent an interesting granular resource for the civil engineering. For this study, fine sediments are chosen because of the difficulties to evacuate them after dredging, in comparison to sands, induced by their high water content, the presence of organic matters, their mechanical behaviour and, in some cases, the presence of pollutants. The paper shows the study carried out with fine sediments from harbours of the north of France. The authors propose recommendations to optimize the re-use of these sediments in considering technical, environmental and economical criteria. A re-use process has been studied in laboratory and tested on field site.

12 citations

Patent
01 Jul 2015

12 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Sediment
48.7K papers, 1.2M citations
83% related
Surface runoff
45.1K papers, 1.1M citations
77% related
Groundwater
59.3K papers, 1M citations
76% related
Land use
57K papers, 1.1M citations
76% related
Ecosystem
25.4K papers, 1.2M citations
76% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023189
2022438
202170
2020119
2019150
2018131