scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Dredging

About: Dredging is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 3300 publications have been published within this topic receiving 28325 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Cheng Liu1, Jicheng Zhong1, Jianjun Wang1, Lu Zhang1, Chengxin Fan1 
TL;DR: The results showed that the release of soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) could be suppressed quickly after dredging, and that the dredging effect was sustained for about 18 months, suggesting that the mid-term (<3 years) reduction of internal N and P loading could be achieved by dredging if the external pollution loading were not reduced.

54 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
02 Dec 2015-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: Relationships with distance from dredging for a range of water quality metrics are described and information can be used to more formally develop water quality thresholds for benthic organisms in future laboratory- and field-based studies using environmentally realistic and relevant exposure scenarios.
Abstract: Dredging poses a potential risk to tropical ecosystems, especially in turbidity-sensitive environments such as coral reefs, filter feeding communities and seagrasses. There is little detailed observational time-series data on the spatial effects of dredging on turbidity and light and defining likely footprints is a fundamental task for impact prediction, the EIA process, and for designing monitoring projects when dredging is underway. It is also important for public perception of risks associated with dredging. Using an extensive collection of in situ water quality data (73 sites) from three recent large scale capital dredging programs in Australia, and which included extensive pre-dredging baseline data, we describe relationships with distance from dredging for a range of water quality metrics. Using a criterion to define a zone of potential impact of where the water quality value exceeds the 80th percentile of the baseline value for turbidity-based metrics or the 20th percentile for the light based metrics, effects were observed predominantly up to three km from dredging, but in one instance up to nearly 20 km. This upper (~20 km) limit was unusual and caused by a local oceanographic feature of consistent unidirectional flow during the project. Water quality loggers were located along the principal axis of this flow (from 200 m to 30 km) and provided the opportunity to develop a matrix of exposure based on running means calculated across multiple time periods (from hours to one month) and distance from the dredging, and summarized across a broad range of percentile values. This information can be used to more formally develop water quality thresholds for benthic organisms, such as corals, filter-feeders (e.g. sponges) and seagrasses in future laboratory- and field-based studies using environmentally realistic and relevant exposure scenarios, that may be used to further refine distance based analyses of impact, potentially further reducing the size of the dredging footprint.

53 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Although predictions about the effect of environmental dredging continue to improve, a clear need remains to better understand the effect that sediment remediation processes have on contaminant exposures and receptors of concern.
Abstract: Timely and effective remediation of contaminated sediments is essential for protecting human health and the environment and restoring beneficial uses to waterways. A number of site operational conditions influence the effect of environmental dredging of contaminated sediment on aquatic systems. Site experience shows that resuspension of contaminated sediment and release of contaminants occur during dredging and that contaminated sediment residuals will remain after operations. It is also understood that these processes affect the magnitude, distribution, and bioavailability of the contaminants, and hence the exposure and risk to receptors of concern. However, even after decades of sediment remediation project experience, substantial uncertainties still exist in our understanding of the cause–effect relationships relating dredging processes to risk. During the past few years, contaminated sediment site managers, researchers, and practitioners have recognized the need to better define and understand dredging-related processes. In this article, we present information and research needs on these processes as synthesized from recent symposia, reports, and remediation efforts. Although predictions about the effect of environmental dredging continue to improve, a clear need remains to better understand the effect that sediment remediation processes have on contaminant exposures and receptors of concern. Collecting, learning from, and incorporating new information into practice is the only avenue to improving the effectiveness of remedial operations. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2010;6:619–630. © 2010 SETAC

53 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This study shows the importance of obtaining both chemical and biological data in standard monitoring procedures and that the remobilization of contaminants by dredging operations may be grossly underestimated, which calls for caution when assessing the impact of these activities even in low to moderately polluted areas.

53 citations

01 Sep 2008
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide technical guidelines for evaluating environmental dredging as a sediment remedy component, which is applicable to contaminated sediment sites evaluated under various environmental laws and regulatory programs.
Abstract: : This report provides technical guidelines for evaluating environmental dredging as a sediment remedy component. This document supports the Contaminated Sediment Remediation Guidance for Hazardous Waste Sites, released by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) in 2005, by providing detailed information regarding evaluation of environmental dredging as a remedy component. This document is intended to be applicable to contaminated sediment sites evaluated under various environmental laws and regulatory programs. The intended audience for this report includes all stakeholders potentially involved in evaluating environmental dredging for purposes of a feasibility study, remedial design, and implementation. The scope of this document is limited to the technical aspects of the environmental dredging process itself, but it is important that environmental dredging be integrated with other components such as transport, dewatering, treatment, and rehandling and disposal options. This report covers initial evaluation, pertinent site conditions and sediment characteristics, environmental dredging performance standards, equipment capabilities and selection, evaluation of production, duration, and transport, methods for estimating resuspension, residuals and release, control measures, operating methods and strategies, and monitoring.

53 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Sediment
48.7K papers, 1.2M citations
83% related
Surface runoff
45.1K papers, 1.1M citations
77% related
Groundwater
59.3K papers, 1M citations
76% related
Land use
57K papers, 1.1M citations
76% related
Ecosystem
25.4K papers, 1.2M citations
76% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023189
2022438
202170
2020119
2019150
2018131