Topic
Dynamic Vibration Absorber
About: Dynamic Vibration Absorber is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 4764 publications have been published within this topic receiving 49429 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this article, a method of multi-mode vibration control for the carbody of high-speed electric multiple unit (EMU) trains by using the onboard and suspended equipments as dynamic vibration absorbers (DVAs) is proposed.
36 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, a second-order acceleration feedback controller that acts as an active vibration absorber is proposed to provide guaranteed stability margins for collocated accelerometer/actuator pairs in the absence of accelerometer and actuator dynamics and computational time delay.
Abstract: The development of control technology for large flexible structures must include practical demonstrations to aid in the understanding of controlled structures in space. To support this effort, a testbed facility has been developed to study practical implementation of new control technologies. The paper discusses the design of a second-order acceleration feedback controller that acts as an active vibration absorber. This controller provides guaranteed stability margins for collocated accelerometer/actuator pairs in the absence of accelerometer/actuator dynamics and computational time delay. Experimental results in the presence of these factors are presented and discussed. The primary performance objective considered is damping augmentation of the first nine structural modes. Comparison of experimental and predicted closed-loop damping is presented, including test and simulated-time histories for open- and closed-loop cases. Although the simulation and test results are not in full agreement, robustness of this design under model uncertainty is demonstrated. The basic advantage of this second-order controller design is that the stability of the controller is model-independent for collocated accelerometers and actuators.
35 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, an on-road energy conversion and vibration absorber apparatus receives the kinetic energy from moving vehicles and pedestrians when being weighed down and converts the received kinetic energy into a potential energy using a restorable elastic element compressing a fluid thereby storing the potential energy in a pressure chamber, and then conducting the pressurized fluid to pass though a check valve along a conduit and drive a vane wheel by releasing its potential energy.
Abstract: An on-road energy conversion and vibration absorber apparatus receives the kinetic energy from moving vehicles and pedestrians when being weighed down, and converts the received kinetic energy into a potential energy using a restorable elastic element compressing a fluid thereby storing the potential energy in a pressure chamber, and then conducting the pressurized fluid to pass though a check valve along a conduit and drive a vane wheel by releasing its potential energy. The vane wheel in turn drives a generator to generate electric energy, and the vibration of the vehicles is alleviated by cushion effect provided by the apparatus.
35 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compared three control strategies for machining chatter: direct velocity feedback, tuned-mass-damper control (or vibration absorber control), and active-tuned-massdamper-control (or active vibrator control).
Abstract: Proof-mass actuators have been considered for a broad range of structural vibration control problems, from seismic protection for tall buildings to the improvement of metal machining productivity by stabilizing the self-excited vibrations known as chatter. This broad range of potential applications means that a variety of controllers have been proposed, without drawing direct comparisons with other controller designs that have been considered for different applications. This article takes three controllers that are potentially suitable for the machining chatter problem: Direct velocity feedback, tuned-mass-damper control (or vibration absorber control), and active-tuned-mass-damper control (or active vibration absorber control). These control strategies are restated within the more general framework of Virtual Passive Control. Their performance is first compared using root locus techniques, with a model based on experimental data, including the low frequency dynamics of the proof-mass. The frequency response of the test structure is then illustrated under open and closed-loop conditions. The application of the control strategies to avoid machine-tool chatter vibrations is then discussed, without going into detail on the underlying physical mechanisms of chatter. It is concluded that virtual passive absorber control is more straightforward to implement than virtual skyhook damping, and may be better suited to the problem of machining chatter.
35 citations