scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Eigenface

About: Eigenface is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 2128 publications have been published within this topic receiving 110119 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper study face hallucination, or synthesizing a high-resolution face image from an input low-resolution image, with the help of a large collection of other high- resolution face images to generate photorealistic face images.
Abstract: In this paper, we study face hallucination, or synthesizing a high-resolution face image from an input low-resolution image, with the help of a large collection of other high-resolution face images. Our theoretical contribution is a two-step statistical modeling approach that integrates both a global parametric model and a local nonparametric model. At the first step, we derive a global linear model to learn the relationship between the high-resolution face images and their smoothed and down-sampled lower resolution ones. At the second step, we model the residue between an original high-resolution image and the reconstructed high-resolution image after applying the learned linear model by a patch-based non-parametric Markov network to capture the high-frequency content. By integrating both global and local models, we can generate photorealistic face images. A practical contribution is a robust warping algorithm to align the low-resolution face images to obtain good hallucination results. The effectiveness of our approach is demonstrated by extensive experiments generating high-quality hallucinated face images from low-resolution input with no manual alignment.

450 citations

01 Jan 1997
TL;DR: Analysis and experimental results indicate that the eigenface algorithm, which is essentially a minimum distance classifier, works well when lighting variation is small but deteriorates significantly as lighting variation increases.
Abstract: This paper is a comparative study of three recently proposed algorithms for face recognition: eigenface, autoassociation and classification neural nets, and elastic matching. After these algorithms were analyzed under a common statistical decision framework, they were evaluated experimentally on four individual data bases, each with a moderate subject size, and a combined data base with more than a hundred different subjects. Analysis and experimental results indicate that the eigenface algorithm, which is essentially a minimum distance classifier, works well when lighting variation is small. Its performance deteriorates significantly as lighting variation increases. The elastic matching algorithm, on the other hand, is insensitive to lighting, face position, and expression variations and therefore is more versatile. The performance of the autoassociation and classification nets is upper bounded by that of the eigenface but is more difficult to implement in practice.

420 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Sep 1997
TL;DR: In this article, a comparative study of three recently proposed algorithms for face recognition: eigenface, auto-association and classification neural nets, and elastic matching was performed under a common statistical decision framework, they were evaluated experimentally on four individual data bases, each with a moderate subject size, and a combined data base with more than a hundred different subjects.
Abstract: This paper is a comparative study of three recently proposed algorithms for face recognition: eigenface, autoassociation and classification neural nets, and elastic matching. After these algorithms were analyzed under a common statistical decision framework, they were evaluated experimentally on four individual data bases, each with a moderate subject size, and a combined data base with more than a hundred different subjects. Analysis and experimental results indicate that the eigenface algorithm, which is essentially a minimum distance classifier, works well when lighting variation is small. Its performance deteriorates significantly as lighting variation increases. The elastic matching algorithm, on the other hand, is insensitive to lighting, face position, and expression variations and therefore is more versatile. The performance of the autoassociation and classification nets is upper bounded by that of the eigenface but is more difficult to implement in practice.

418 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper first model face difference with three components: intrinsic difference, transformation difference, and noise, and builds a unified framework by using this face difference model and a detailed subspace analysis on the three components.
Abstract: PCA, LDA, and Bayesian analysis are the three most representative subspace face recognition approaches. In this paper, we show that they can be unified under the same framework. We first model face difference with three components: intrinsic difference, transformation difference, and noise. A unified framework is then constructed by using this face difference model and a detailed subspace analysis on the three components. We explain the inherent relationship among different subspace methods and their unique contributions to the extraction of discriminating information from the face difference. Based on the framework, a unified subspace analysis method is developed using PCA, Bayes, and LDA as three steps. A 3D parameter space is constructed using the three subspace dimensions as axes. Searching through this parameter space, we achieve better recognition performance than standard subspace methods.

400 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: EP has better recognition performance than PCA (eigenfaces) and better generalization abilities than the Fisher linear discriminant (Fisherfaces).
Abstract: Introduces evolutionary pursuit (EP) as an adaptive representation method for image encoding and classification In analogy to projection pursuit, EP seeks to learn an optimal basis for the dual purpose of data compression and pattern classification It should increase the generalization ability of the learning machine as a result of seeking the trade-off between minimizing the empirical risk encountered during training and narrowing the confidence interval for reducing the guaranteed risk during testing It therefore implements strategies characteristic of GA for searching the space of possible solutions to determine the optimal basis It projects the original data into a lower dimensional whitened principal component analysis (PCA) space Directed random rotations of the basis vectors in this space are searched by GA where evolution is driven by a fitness function defined by performance accuracy (empirical risk) and class separation (confidence interval) Accuracy indicates the extent to which learning has been successful, while separation gives an indication of expected fitness The method has been tested on face recognition using a greedy search algorithm To assess both accuracy and generalization capability, the data includes for each subject images acquired at different times or under different illumination conditions EP has better recognition performance than PCA (eigenfaces) and better generalization abilities than the Fisher linear discriminant (Fisherfaces)

343 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Feature (computer vision)
128.2K papers, 1.7M citations
87% related
Feature extraction
111.8K papers, 2.1M citations
86% related
Image segmentation
79.6K papers, 1.8M citations
85% related
Convolutional neural network
74.7K papers, 2M citations
83% related
Deep learning
79.8K papers, 2.1M citations
82% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202316
202249
202120
202043
201953
201840