scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Emotional intelligence

About: Emotional intelligence is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 18082 publications have been published within this topic receiving 393093 citations. The topic is also known as: EI & Emotional Intelligence Quotient、 EQ.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors suggest that feelings play a central role in the leadership process and that emotional intelligence, the ability to understand and manage moods and emotions in the self and others, contributes to effective leadership in organizations.
Abstract: This paper suggests that feelings (moods and emotions) play a central role in the leadership process. More specifically, it is proposed that emotional intelligence, the ability to understand and manage moods and emotions in the self and others, contributes to effective leadership in organizations. Four major aspects of emotional intelligence, the appraisal and expression of emotion, the use of emotion to enhance cognitive processes and decision making, knowledge about emotions, and management of emotions, are described. Then, I propose how emotional intelligence contributes to effective leadership by focusing on five essential elements of leader effectiveness: development of collective goals and objectives; instilling in others an appreciation of the importance of work activities; generating and maintaining enthusiasm, confidence, optimism, cooperation, and trust; encouraging flexibility in decision making and change; and establishing and maintaining a meaningful identity for an organization.

1,809 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Mar 2000
TL;DR: Mayer and Salovey as mentioned in this paper defined emotional intelligence as the ability to perceive and express emotion, assimilate emotion in thought, understand and reason with emotion, and regulate emotion in the self and others.
Abstract: COMPETING MODELS OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE Studies of emotional intelligence initially appeared in academic articles beginning in the early 1990s. By middecade, the concept had attracted considerable popular attention, and powerful claims were made concerning its importance for predicting success. Emotional intelligence is the set of abilities that accounts for how people's emotional reports vary in their accuracy and how the more accurate understanding of emotion leads to better problem solving in an individual's emotional life. More formally, we define emotional intelligence as the ability to perceive and express emotion, assimilate emotion in thought, understand and reason with emotion, and regulate emotion in the self and others (Mayer & Salovey, 1997). As of now, the academic concept has been developed over several theoretical articles (e.g., Mayer & Salovey, 1997; Salovey & Mayer, 1990) and is based on a growing body of relevant research (e.g., Averill & Nunley, 1992; Buck, 1984; Lane, Sechrest, Reidel et al., 1996; Mayer, DiPaolo, & Salovey, 1990; Mayer & Geher, 1996; Mayer & Stevens, 1994; Rosenthal, Hall, DiMatteo, Rogers, & Archer, 1979; Salovey, Mayer, Goldman, Turvey, & Palfai, 1995; see also, Salovey & Sluyter, 1997). Shortly after the academic work began, a popular book on the subject appeared (Goleman, 1995a). The book covered much of the literature reviewed in the aforementioned articles as well as considerable additional research on emotions and the brain, emotions and social behavior, and school-based programs designed to help children develop emotional and social skills.

1,756 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is found that Specific-Ability and Integrative-Model approaches adequately conceptualize and measure EI and those studies that address the relation between EI measures and meaningful criteria including social outcomes, performance, and psychological and physical well-being are pivotal.
Abstract: Emotional intelligence (EI) involves the ability to carry out accurate reasoning about emotions and the ability to use emotions and emotional knowledge to enhance thought. We discuss the origins of the EI concept, define EI, and describe the scope of the field today. We review three approaches taken to date from both a theoretical and methodological perspective. We find that Specific-Ability and Integrative-Model approaches adequately conceptualize and measure EI. Pivotal in this review are those studies that address the relation between EI measures and meaningful criteria including social outcomes, performance, and psychological and physical well-being. The Discussion section is followed by a list of summary points and recommended issues for future research.

1,708 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: The author summarizes the key points, discusses the limitations of the model, and raises the ideas for developing a future model of ESI.
Abstract: The present manuscript is an empirically based theoretical paper that presents, describes, and examines the Bar-On Model of Emotional-Social Intelligence (ESI) in deep. First, a description of the Emotional Quotient Inventory (the EQ-i), which has played an instrumental role in developing the model, is given. The EQ-i is a self-report measure of emotionally and socially intelligent behaviour. It has been translated into more than 30 languages, and data have been collected around the world. The impact of age, gender, and ethnicity on the Bar-On model is presented. A description of the model's construct and predictive validity is given. Finally, the author summarizes the key points, discusses the limitations of the model, and raises the ideas for developing a future model of ESI.

1,575 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Mar 2003-Emotion
TL;DR: The MSCEIT achieved reasonable reliability, and confirmatory factor analysis supported theoretical models of EI, helping clarify issues raised in earlier articles published in Emotion.
Abstract: Does a recently introduced ability scale adequately measure emotional intelligence (EI) skills? Using the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT; J. D. Mayer, P. Salovey, & D. R. Caruso, 2002b), the authors examined (a) whether members of a general standardization sample and emotions experts identified the same test answers as correct, (b) the test's reliability, and (c) the possible factor structures of EI. Twenty-one emotions experts endorsed many of the same answers, as did 2,112 members of the standardization sample, and exhibited superior agreement, particularly when research provides clearer answers to test questions (e.g., emotional perception in faces). The MSCEIT achieved reasonable reliability, and confirmatory factor analysis supported theoretical models of EI. These findings help clarify issues raised in earlier articles published in Emotion.

1,563 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Job satisfaction
58K papers, 1.8M citations
89% related
Qualitative research
39.9K papers, 2.3M citations
84% related
Personality
75.6K papers, 2.6M citations
82% related
Empirical research
51.3K papers, 1.9M citations
82% related
Cognition
99.9K papers, 4.3M citations
80% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20244
2023881
20221,900
20211,073
20201,384
20191,347