scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Enlightenment

About: Enlightenment is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 6845 publications have been published within this topic receiving 116832 citations.


Papers
More filters
Book
01 Jan 2009
TL;DR: The most extensive critical Italian edition of "Dei delitti e delle pene" was published in 1984 as discussed by the authors, the last edition that Beccaria personally oversaw and revised.
Abstract: Becarria's influential "Treatise On Crimes and Punishments" is considered a foundation work in the modern field of criminology. As Newman and Marongiu note in their introduction to the work, three master themes of the Enlightenment run through the Treatise: the idea of the social contract, the idea of science, and the belief in progress. The idea of the social contact forms the moral and political basis of the work's reformist zeal. The idea of science supports a dispassionate and reasoned appeal for reforms. The belief in progress is inextricably bound to the idea of science. All three provide the necessary foundation for accepting Beccaria's proposals. It is virtually impossible to ascertain which of several versions of the Treatise that appeared during his lifetime best reflected Becccaria's own thought. His use of many ideas of Enlightenment thinkers also makes it difficult to interpret what he has written. While Enlightenment thinkers wanted to break the chains of religion and advocated free men and free minds, there was considerable disagreement as to how this might be achieved, except in the most general terms. The editors have based this translation on the "Francioni" (1984) text, by far the most exhaustive critical Italian edition of "Dei delitti e delle pene". This edition is undoubtedly the last that Beccaria personally oversaw and revised. This new translation, which includes an outstanding opening essay by the editors, is a welcome introduction to Beccaria and to the modern beginnings of criminology.

80 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
24 Sep 2008-Minerva
TL;DR: The authors examines conceptions of scientific internationalism from the Enlightenment to the Cold War, and their varying relations to cosmopolitanism, nationalism, socialism, and "the West" and concludes that science is fundamentally universal.
Abstract: That science is fundamentally universal has been proclaimed innumerable times. But the precise geographical meaning of this universality has changed historically. This article examines conceptions of scientific internationalism from the Enlightenment to the Cold War, and their varying relations to cosmopolitanism, nationalism, socialism, and ‘the West’. These views are confronted with recent tendencies to cast science as a uniquely European product.

79 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article argued that the Enlightenments from their outset recognized the possibility of an intellectual fanaticism arising within as well as without the enterprises in which they were engaged, and the historicist error is that of supposing that all roads led to this conclusion.
Abstract: TW A Te are moving toward a reassessment of Enlightenment, in which there will no longer be "The Enlightenment,"a unitary and universal phenomenon with a single history to be either celebrated or condemned, but instead a family of discourses arising about the same time in a number of European cultures, Protestant as well as Catholic, insular as well as peninsular, and certainly not all occasioned by the Parisian intellectual hegemony that sought to establish itself among them. This view reasserts the diversity of cultures, some of them national and some of them built by states, in a Europe presenting itself at the end of the twentieth century as a cultural homogenization bent on the destruction of both states and nations; in resisting this aggression, the study of Enlightenment discourses seeks to maintain the open society by articulating the diversity of voices within it. Within a family of Enlightenments, furthermore, there is room for the recognition of family quarrels, some of them bitter and terrible in their conduct; and in escaping the false unity of "The Enlightenment," we escape the error of regarding "it" as culminating in "The Enlightenment Project," a construct invented by both left and right in order that they many denounce it (thus imposing on the open society the poverty of historicism). This enterprise, however malevolent, focuses on a problem others may wish to discuss: how it was that Enlightenment, very often at its beginnings a program of persuading the human mind to recognize its limitations, in certain cases became a program of revolutionary triumphalism. This did sometimes happen; the historicist error is that of supposing that all roads led to this conclusion. By first pluralizing the Enlightenments, and then by focusing upon the concept of enthusiasm-one of the key words in the Enlightened lexicon-this essay attempts to show that the Enlightenments from their outset recognized the possibility of an intellectual fanaticism arising within as well as without the enterprises in which they were engaged.

79 citations

Book
01 Jan 1996
TL;DR: Sorkin this article argues that Mendelssohn attempted to rearticulate the medieval Jewish rationalist tradition in the terms of eighteenth-century philosophy, thereby showing his essential similarity to the Protestant and Catholic thinkers of the religious Enlightenment who attempted to use the new science and philosophy to renew faith.
Abstract: Through a close study of Mendelssohn's Hebrew and German writings, David Sorkin argues that Mendelssohn's two spheres of endeavor were entirely consistent. Mendelssohn attempted to rearticulate the medieval Jewish rationalist tradition in the terms of eighteenth-century philosophy, thereby showing his essential similarity to the Protestant and Catholic thinkers of the religious Enlightenment who attempted to use the new science and philosophy to renew faith. Sorkin restores Mendelssohn to his eighteenth-century milieu and in so doing shows that Mendelssohn, by being turned into a symbol, has been fundamentally misunderstood.

79 citations

Book
30 Nov 1981
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the foundations of modern empiricism and the history of geography in the seventeenth-century encounter between science and philosophy, and discuss the way ahead.
Abstract: 1. Foundations of modern empiricism 2. Science and geography: the seventeenth-century encounter 3. Geography in decline: the age of Newton 4. Eighteenth-century empiricism: Locke, Berkley and Hume 5. On the margins of science: eighteenth-century geography texts 6. Science and philosophy: enlightenment conflicts in Europe 7. Geography revived: the age of Humboldt 8. Epilogue: the way ahead.

79 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Ideology
54.2K papers, 1.1M citations
89% related
China
84.3K papers, 983.5K citations
80% related
Politics
263.7K papers, 5.3M citations
79% related
Happiness
22K papers, 728.4K citations
78% related
Government
141K papers, 1.9M citations
77% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20241
2023965
20222,158
202181
2020179
2019214