Epworth Sleepiness Scale

About: Epworth Sleepiness Scale is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 4742 publications have been published within this topic receiving 155088 citations.

Continuous positive airways pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea is the periodic reduction (hypopnoea) or cessation (apnoea) of breathing due to narrowing or occlusion of the upper airway during sleep. The main symptom is daytime sleepiness and it has been suggested it is linked to premature death, hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, stroke and road traffic accidents. OBJECTIVES: The main treatment for sleep apnoea is with the use of continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP), which requires a flow generator and mask. These are used at night to prevent apnoea, hypoxia and sleep disturbance. The objective was to assess the effects of CPAP in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Trials Register and reference lists of articles. We consulted experts in the field. Searches were current to July 2005. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials comparing nocturnal CPAP with an inactive control or oral appliances in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea (an apnoea and hypopnoea index greater than five per hour). Trials had a minimum intervention period of two weeks. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed and two review authors extracted data independently. Study authors were contacted for missing information. Parallel and crossover group trials were analysed separately. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-six trials involving 1718 people met the inclusion criteria. Study quality was mixed. Compared with control, CPAP showed significant improvements in objective and subjective sleepiness and several quality of life, cognitive function and depression measures (parallel-group studies: Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) -3.83 units, 95% CI -4.57 to -3.09; crossover studies: ESS -1.84 units, 95% CI -2.57 to -1.11). Twenty-four hour systolic and diastolic blood pressures were lower with CPAP compared with control (parallel-group trials). Compared with oral appliances, CPAP significantly reduced the apnoea and hypopnoea index (crossover studies: -7.97 events/hr, 95% CI -9.56 to -6.38) and improved sleep efficiency (crossover studies: 2.31%, 95% CI 0.02 to 4.6) and minimum oxygen saturation (4.14%, 95% CI 3.25 to 5.03). Responders to both treatments expressed a strong preference for the oral appliance. However, participants were more likely to withdraw on OA than on CPAP therapy. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: CPAP is effective in reducing symptoms of sleepiness and improving quality of life measures in people with moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). It is more effective than oral appliances in reducing respiratory disturbances in these people but subjective outcomes are more equivocal. Certain people tend to prefer oral appliances to CPAP where both are effective. This could be because they offer a more convenient way of controlling OSA. Short-term data indicate that CPAP leads to lower blood pressure than in controls. Long-term data are required for all outcomes in order to determine whether the initial benefits seen in short-term clinical trials persist. Language: en

Relationship between hours of CPAP use and achieving normal levels of sleepiness and daily functioning.

Abstract: CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE (CPAP) CURRENTLY IS CONSIDERED THE MOST EFFECTIVE TREATMENT FOR OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA (OSA) THIS device provides a pneumatic splint to prevent nocturnal airway collapse In randomized clinical trials that included use of sham CPAP as a placebo, treatment with this device has been shown to produce improvements in symptoms, quality of life, sleepiness, neuropsychological performance, and hypertension1 It has also been established that optimal effectiveness depends on consistent use Skipping even 1 night of treatment reverses improvements in daytime sleepiness, response performance, and the physiologic measure of disease severity, the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)2–4 Although these benefits have been shown in randomized clinical trials, there is considerable variation in use of CPAP by patients in routine clinical practice,5–8 with approximately half using it consistently every night on average 6 hours per night and the other half skipping from 1 to 7 nights per week using it on average 35 hours per night5 It is not known, however, what the impact of differential use of CPAP is on effectiveness of therapy in routine clinical practice It may be that individuals with shorter hours of use are, in general, less well treated with respect to improvements in outcomes such as sleepiness, than are those with longer durations of use Alternatively, there might be individual variation in need for CPAP so that, even though some individuals have shorter hours of CPAP use, they are effectively treated with respect to sleepiness This individual variation might be mediated by biologic mechanisms similar to those of the recently described individual variation in response to sleep deprivation9 To address this question, we conducted a multisite effectiveness study in which we evaluated clinical status outcomes before and after 3 months of routine clinical care that included measurement of CPAP adherence during the entire follow-up period This multisite international study capitalized on patient heterogeneity with regard to average nightly use of CPAP, in order to estimate relationships between the likelihood of achieving a “normal” value on salient clinical measures of sleepiness and functional status and the “dose” of CPAP treatment received (ie, hours of CPAP use per night) Because there is no consensus regarding which outcomes are primary with regard to the assessment of CPAP treatment response, we chose those deemed most applicable to the clinical management of OSA—subjective sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]10), physiologic sleepiness (Multiple Sleep Latency Test [MSLT]11), and disease-specific functional status (Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire [FOSQ]12) By evaluating the nightly duration of CPAP relative to obtaining normal values in those impaired on each of these measures, we provide data that the clinician can employ in determining optimal treatment response within the context of treatment goals, eg, to reduce daytime sleepiness, improve daily functioning, or both

Upper airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea

Abstract: BACKGROUND Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with considerable health risks. Although continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) can mitigate these risks, effectiveness can be reduced by inadequate adherence to treatment. We evaluated the clinical safety and effectiveness of upper-airway stimulation at 12 months for the treatment of moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS Using a multicenter, prospective, single-group, cohort design, we surgically implanted an upper-airway stimulation device in patients with obstructive sleep apnea who had difficulty either accepting or adhering to CPAP therapy. The primary outcome measures were the apnea–hypopnea index (AHI; the number of apnea or hypopnea events per hour, with a score of ≥15 indicating moderate-to-severe apnea) and the oxygen desaturation index (ODI; the number of times per hour of sleep that the blood oxygen level drops by ≥4 percentage points from baseline). Secondary outcome measures were the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), and the percentage of sleep time with the oxygen saturation less than 90%. Consecutive participants with a response were included in a randomized, controlled therapy-withdrawal trial. RESULTS The study included 126 participants; 83% were men. The mean age was 54.5 years, and the mean body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) was 28.4. The median AHI score at 12 months decreased 68%, from 29.3 events per hour to 9.0 events per hour (P<0.001); the ODI score decreased 70%, from 25.4 events per hour to 7.4 events per hour (P<0.001). Secondary outcome measures showed a reduction in the effects of sleep apnea and improved quality of life. In the randomized phase, the mean AHI score did not differ significantly from the 12-month score in the nonrandomized phase among the 23 participants in the therapy-maintenance group (8.9 and 7.2 events per hour, respectively); the AHI score was significantly higher (indicating more severe apnea) among the 23 participants in the therapy-withdrawal group (25.8 vs. 7.6 events per hour, P<0.001). The ODI results followed a similar pattern. The rate of procedure-related serious adverse events was less than 2%. CONCLUSIONS In this uncontrolled cohort study, upper-airway stimulation led to significant improvements in objective and subjective measurements of the severity of obstructive sleep apnea. (Funded by Inspire Medical Systems; STAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01161420.)

Association of Resident Fatigue and Distress With Perceived Medical Errors

Abstract: Results The mean response rate to individual surveys was 67.5%. Of the 356 participants providing error data (93.7%), 139 (39%) reported making at least 1 major medical error during the study period. In univariate analyses, there was an association of subsequent self-reported error with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (odds ratio [OR], 1.10 per unit increase; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.16; P=.002) and fatigue score (OR, 1.14 per unit increase; 95% CI, 1.08-1.21; P.001). Subsequent error was also associated with burnout (ORs per 1-unit change: depersonalization OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.12; P.001; emotional exhaustion OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.041.08;P.001; lower personal accomplishment OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.97; P.001), a positive depression screen (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.76-3.72;P.001), and overall QOL (OR, 0.84 per unit increase; 95% CI, 0.79-0.91; P.001). Fatigue and distress variables remained statistically significant when modeled together with little change in the point estimates of effect. Sleepiness and distress, when modeled together, showed little change in point estimates of effect, but sleepiness no longer had a statistically significant association with errors when adjusted for burnout or depression. Conclusion Among internal medicine residents, higher levels of fatigue and distress are independently associated with self-perceived medical errors.