Showing papers on "Face (sociological concept) published in 1980"
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors of a paper submitted to a leading social psychology journal were cross-classified by number of authors and a small relationship in the predicted direction was obtained and it persisted in the face of two relevant controls.
Abstract: Does collaboration improve the quality of scientific research? Editorial decision on papers submitted to a leading social psychology journal was cross-classified by number of authors. A small relationship in the predicted direction was obtained and it persisted in the face of two relevant controls.
132 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, a book that we will offer right here is the soft file concept, which is what make you can easily find and get this western political theory in the face of the future by reading this site.
Abstract: If you get the printed book in on-line book store, you may also find the same problem. So, you must move store to store and search for the available there. But, it will not happen here. The book that we will offer right here is the soft file concept. This is what make you can easily find and get this western political theory in the face of the future by reading this site. We offer you the best product, always and always.
49 citations
Journal Article•
15 citations
Book•
01 Aug 1980
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore the limits of collaboration between sociologist and theologian and explore the relationship between sociology and theology in their changing intellectual context. But they do not discuss the relationship of sociological explanations of religious phenomena and theology.
Abstract: Introduction: Of Two Minds, John Orme Mills 1. The Limits of Displacement: two disciplines face each other, Eileen Barker 2. Displacements and Reinstatements: the relations between sociology and theology considered in their changing intellectual context, Christopher Harris. Responses by Mary Hesse, Fergus Kerr, Nicholas Lash 3. The Sociological Mode and the Theological Vocabulary, David Martin 4. Theodicy and Social Theory: an exploration of the limits of collaboration between sociologist and theologian, W.S.F. Pickering 5. The Rational System of Beliefs, W. Donald Hudson 6. From Sociology to Theology, Robin Gill 7. The Sociology of Roman Catholic Theology, Gregory Baum 8. God, Man and Media: on a problem arising when theologians speak of the modern world, John Orme Mills 9. Relativizing the Relativizers: a theologian's assessment of the role of sociological explanation of religious phenomena and theology today, Timothy Radcliffe 10. Theology and Sociology: what point is there in keeping the distinction?, Antoine Lion Epilogue: Many Voices, Robert Towler Select Bibliography Index of Authors, Biblical Names and Sources
14 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a defense of situationalist approaches to study the rhetoric of social movements in the face of criticisms by McGee and Zarefsky, and defend the use of situationalism in social movements.
Abstract: This essay presents a defense of situationalist approaches to study of the rhetoric of social movements in the face of criticisms by McGee and Zarefsky.
14 citations
Journal Article•
TL;DR: The centrality of the human face as symbolic of personality permeates the fabric of human experience, and psychoanalytic concern with the “mirror” metaphor in clinical work and the psychology of the self carries an implicit reference to thehuman face as the center of personality.
Abstract: The centrality of the human face as symbolic of personality permeates the fabric of human experience. It is often observed that a full face to face sexual encounter is unique to human beings, an event profoundly linked with an earlier structural correlate—the rapt stare of the human infant at the mother's face during feeding. Again, as the infant develops, the appearance of a face or even mask is enough to evoke another uniquely defining quality of the human dimension—an expressively radiant smile. In a related fashion psychoanalytic concern with the “mirror” metaphor in clinical work and the psychology of the self carries an implicit reference to the human face as the center of personality, symbolically linked with reflexive mind.a
11 citations
[...]
TL;DR: In 1968 Paul Goodman, the radical social critic, came to Temple University, introduced himself as a social psychologist, and spoke eloquently against the war in Vietnam, none of this is surprising except for Goodman's self-identification as asocial psychologist.
Abstract: The history of social psychology offers some clues as to how it reached its stance on laboratory work. The widely acknowledged founder of experimental social psychology was Kurt Lewin, whose career spanned the twenties to the fifties. His famous adage, "There is nothing so practical as a good theory," soon came to be translated into something more like "Take care of theory and practical matters will take care of themselves." The deception researcher's personal dilemma is this: either one successfully dissociates the carefully crafted manipulative-ness that characterizes the relationship with research subjects from relationships with people outside the laboratory, or one does not. People should worry about the impact of inauthentic relationship on the subject, and about the researcher's learning to systematically shut off ethically central aspects of his or her personality learning to lie with a completely straight face and clear conscience.
8 citations
TL;DR: This article provided an account of contrasting cultural styles which are often a source of major difficulties in cross-cultural understanding, using the experiences of myself and my husband, who went into the field in Tlaxcala and Puebla convinced that we were warm, friendly, outgoing people.
Abstract: Recent work on politeness by Lakoff (1973) and Brown and Levinson (1978) provides some underlying principles which allow us to provide an account of contrasting cultural styles which are often a source of major difficulties in cross-cultural understanding. The examples in this paper are largely drawn from the experiences of myself and my husband, who went into the field in Tlaxcala and Puebla convinced that we were warm, friendly, outgoing people. We turned out, however, in contrast to the people among whom we worked, to exemplify an extraordinarily “up-tight” cultural style which is probably widespread among professional-managerial North Americans, including a good many anthropologists. An understanding of politeness principles proposed here may allow other field anthropologists working in similar contexts to modify their behavior to avoid many of the problems of misunderstanding and genuine full-blown “culture shock” which we experienced.