Flying squirrel

About: Flying squirrel is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 360 publications have been published within this topic receiving 5689 citations. The topic is also known as: flying squirrel.

Utilization of Nest Boxes by the Southern Flying Squirrel, Glaucomys volans, in Central Arkansas

Abstract: Thirty-five nest boxes were placed 4.5-5.5 meters above the ground in an eight acre mixed pine-hardwood plot 20 km SE of Bryant, Saline County, Arkansas. These boxes were moni- tored from February, 1972, to May, 1975. Flying squirrels used the boxes between October and May, probably returning to den trees during the hotter period of the year. A total of 30 squirrels (18 males and 12 females) were marked by ear notching during the three year period. The winter population of the study area was estimated to be between 10 and 15 squirrels. It was not uncommon to find eight or more squirrels in one nest. There were five litters born in nest boxes during the study, with an average of two young/litter. Examina- tion of other females during January and February, together with these litters, indicated that all spring litters were born during March. Boxes served either as nesting areas or feeding stations. Nests were composed of shredded bark with a moss base and often filled a box to a depth of 8or more centimeters. Acorns were the major fooditem, with sweet-gum balls, immature pine cones, and insects also being utilized. Between April and October, the boxes were utilized most extensively by gray tree frogs, red wasps, dirt-dauber wasps, woodroaches, wrens, and black rat snakes.

A new “flying squirrel” (Rodentia: Sciuridae) from the Early Miocene of southwestern Saskatchewan

Abstract: Sciurion campestre, a new genus and species of “flying squirrel”, from the Cypress Hills Formation of southwestern Saskatchewan, is distinct from known North American and European Petauristinae. The fauna with which it is associated indicates a Hemingfordian age. This “flying squirrel” is the oldest known from the Great Plains of North America.

Keeping tabs : Are redundant marking systems needed for rodents?

Abstract: We use survival analysis to compare failure of passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags and loss of metal ear tags in 2,277 southern flying squirrels (Glaucomys volans), 124 house mice (Mus musculus), 112 hispid cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus), and 374 deer (Peromyscus maniculatus) and cotton mice (P. gossypinus). With the exception of cotton rats, failure rates between ear and PIT tags differed by species. Flying squirrels exhibited the highest proportional loss of both tag types and lost ear tags more readily than PIT tags failed. The opposite was true for cotton rats and deer and cotton mice. Most PIT tags appeared to fail shortly after implantation (≤3 days), except for flying squirrels and, to a lesser extent, cotton rats. Ear tags exhibited a consistent rate of loss in flying squirrels. Body mass did not influence failure of PIT tags; however, flying squirrel body mass was associated with increased loss of ear tags. For flying squirrels PIT tag failure increased with the number of times an individual had already received a PIT tag that failed. We provide recommendations for using PIT and ear tags in marking rodents based on species-specific patterns and suggest the combined use of external and internal markers to obtain the most reliable estimates of population parameters.

Gliding locomotion of Siberian flying squirrels in low-canopy forests: the role of energy-inefficient short-distance glides

Abstract: Short glides of less than 20 m seem energy inefficient for the Siberian flying squirrel Pteromys volans as with the northern flying squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus. However, Siberian flying squirrels in low-canopy forests frequently use short glides. Therefore, we sought to clarify the gliding patterns of Siberian flying squirrels for energy-efficient gliding transport in low-canopy forests (mean tree height, 15.3 m) in Hokkaido, Japan, based on records of 66 glides and 35 launch and landing trees. Mean launch height, landing height, and horizontal glide distance were 14.4, 2.7, and 21.4 m, respectively. For short distances, horizontal glide distance was strongly correlated with launch heights but not with launch tree height. For glides of more than 20 m, horizontal glide distance was significantly correlated with both launch height and launch tree height. The mean heights of launch and landing trees for short glides were 15.6 and 19.5 m, respectively. For long glides, these heights were 22.7 and 19.2 m. For short glides, mean launch tree height did not differ from overall mean tree height. However, for long glides, the mean launch tree height was greater than the overall mean tree height. Also, for short glides, the height of the landing tree was greater than that of the launch tree. Launch trees used for long glides were as high as the landing trees used in short glides. From these results, we conclude that Siberian flying squirrels in low-canopy forests save energy by gliding initially from a tree with sufficient height to permit a glide to a taller tree. This taller tree then permits long-distance glides that are energetically more efficient.

Oldest skeleton of a fossil flying squirrel casts new light on the phylogeny of the group

Abstract: Mammals can walk, hop, swim and fly; a few, like marsupial sugar gliders or colugos, can even glide. With 52 species scattered across the Northern hemisphere, flying squirrels are by far the most successful group that adopted this way of going airborne. To drift from tree to tree, these small animals pack their own ‘parachute’: a membrane draping between their lower limbs and the long cartilage rods that extend from their wrists. Tiny specialized wrist bones, which are unique to flying squirrels, help to support the cartilaginous extensions. The origin of flying squirrels is a point of contention: while most genetic studies point towards the group splitting from tree squirrels about 23 million years ago, the oldest remains – mostly cheek teeth – suggest the animals were already soaring through forests 36 million years ago. However, recent studies show that the dental features used to distinguish between gliding and non-gliding squirrels may actually be shared by the two groups. In 2002, the digging of a dump site in Barcelona unearthed a peculiar skeleton: first a tail and two thigh bones, big enough that the researchers thought it could be the fossil of a small primate. In fact, and much to the disappointment of paleoprimatologists, further excavating revealed that it was a rodent. As the specimen – nearly an entire skeleton – was being prepared, paleontologists insisted that all the ‘dirt’ attached to the bones had to be carefully screen-washed. From the mud emerged the minuscule specialized wrist bones: the primate-turned-rodent was in fact Miopetaurista neogrivensis, an extinct flying squirrel. Here, Casanovas-Vilar et al. describe the 11.6 million years old fossil, the oldest ever found. The wrist bones reveal that the animal belongs to the group of flying squirrels that have large sizes. Evolutionary analyses that combined molecular and paleontological data demonstrated that flying squirrels evolved from tree squirrels as far back as 31 to 25 million years ago, and possibly even earlier. In addition, the results show that Miopetaurista is closely related to Petaurista, a modern group of giant flying squirrels. In fact, their skeletons are so similar that the large species that currently inhabit the tropical and subtropical forests of Asia could be considered living fossils. Molecular and paleontological data are often at odds, but this fossil shows that they can be reconciled and combined to retrace history. Discovering older fossils, or even transitional forms, could help to retrace how flying squirrels took a leap from the rest of their evolutionary tree.