Foveal

About: Foveal is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 2652 publications have been published within this topic receiving 94120 citations.

Impaired analysis of moving objects due to deficient smooth pursuit eye movements

Abstract: It is usually assumed that the raison d'etre for smooth pursuit eye movements is an advantage in the visual analysis of moving objects due to the stabilization of the retinal image on the fovea. Although such benefits resulting from foveal pursuit are plausible, there have been few attempts to demonstrate them rigorously. Moreover, it is unknown whether and to what extent pursuit deficits due to neurological disease impair vision. In this study, therefore, we measured psychophysical thresholds for two different discrimination tasks assessing the visual analysis of moving objects as a function of smooth pursuit performance. Results from a group of healthy subjects were compared with those obtained from patients exhibiting catch-up saccades ( n = 9) or saccadic intrusions in the form of square-wave jerks ( n = 2). In a first set of experiments we measured acuity thresholds for Landolt optotypes moving horizontally at velocities of up to 14°/s (dynamic visual acuity, DVA). In the control group ( n = 20), DVA thresholds were indistinguishable from thresholds observed under stationary fixation due to efficient pursuit eye movements allowing continuous foveal stabilization of the retinal Landolt image. In contrast, all patients with catch-up saccades showed pursuit gains that decreased with increasing velocity, paralleled by a dramatic rise in DVA thresholds. Patients with square-wave jerks in turn revealed sufficient pursuit velocity but impaired foveation due to the involuntary saccades that occurred at similar frequencies independent of target velocity. In these patients, thresholds were more or less independent of the Landolt velocity but significantly raised compared with controls. Similar results were obtained in a test determining the sensitivity for vertical position steps of a given pursuit target. In summary, our results indicate that the lack of adequate pursuit eye movements is indeed deleterious for the visual analysis of moving objects.

How are spatial filters used in fovea and parafovea

Abstract: The information used in the output of the visual filters was examined for a blur discrimination task for which it had previously been claimed that the best human performance was with pedestal blurs of intermediate magnitude. This conclusion was verified for parameters leading to asymptotic performance for foveal and parafoveal locations. The nature of the computations underlying these visual discriminations was then assessed experimentally and by simulations. The results suggest that a frequency-based model in its simplest form cannot explain these findings. A model based on the spatial properties of filter outputs is discussed.

Functional neuroanatomy of the human near/far response to blur cues: eye-lens accommodation/vergence to point targets varying in depth.

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to identify the networks involved in the regulation of visual accommodation/vergence by contrasting the cortical functions subservient to eye-lens accommodation with those evoked by foveal fixation. Neural activity was assessed in normal volunteers by changes in rCBF measured with PET. Thirteen right-handed subjects participated in three monocular tasks: (i) resting with eyes closed; (ii) sustained foveal fixation upon a LED at 1.2 m (0.83 D); and (iii) accommodating alternately on a near (24 cm, 4.16 D) vs. a far (3.0 m, 0.33 D) LED alternately illuminated in sequential 2 s epochs. The contrast between the conditions of near/far accommodation and of constant foveal fixation revealed activation in cerebellar hemispheres and vermis; middle and inferior temporal cortex (BA 20, 21, 37); striate cortex and associative visual areas (BA 17/18). Comparison of the condition of constant fixation with the condition of resting with closed eyes indicated activation of cerebellar hemispheres and vermis; visual cortices (BA 17/18); a right hemisphere dominant network encompassing prefrontal (BA 6, 9, 47), superior parietal (BA 7), and superior temporal (BA 40) cortices; and bilateral thalamus. The contrast between the conditions of near/far accommodation with closed-eye rest reflected an incremental summation of the activations found in the previous comparisons (i.e. activations associated with constant fixation). Neural circuits activated selectively during the near/far response to blur cues over those during constant visual fixation, occupy posterior structures that include occipital visual regions, cerebellar hemispheres and vermis, and temporal cortex.

Human discrimination of visual direction of motion with and without smooth pursuit eye movements.

Abstract: It has long been known that ocular pursuit of a moving target has a major influence on its perceived speed (Aubert, 1886; Fleischl, 1882). However, little is known about the effect of smooth pursuit on the perception of target direction. Here we compare the precision of human visual-direction judgments under two oculomotor conditions (pursuit vs. fixation). We also examine the impact of stimulus duration (200 ms vs. ~800 ms) and absolute direction (cardinal vs. oblique). Our main finding is that direction discrimination thresholds in the fixation and pursuit conditions are indistinguishable. Furthermore, the two oculomotor conditions showed oblique effects of similar magnitudes. These data suggest that the neural direction signals supporting perception are the same with or without pursuit, despite remarkably different retinal stimulation. During fixation, the stimulus information is restricted to large, purely peripheral retinal motion, while during steady-state pursuit, the stimulus information consists of small, unreliable foveal retinal motion and a large efference-copy signal. A parsimonious explanation of our findings is that the signal limiting the precision of direction judgments is a neural estimate of target motion in head-centered (or world-centered) coordinates (i.e., a combined retinal and eye motion signal) as found in the medial superior temporal area (MST), and not simply an estimate of retinal motion as found in the middle temporal area (MT).