Full configuration interaction

About: Full configuration interaction is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 1081 publications have been published within this topic receiving 61024 citations.

A full coupled‐cluster singles and doubles model: The inclusion of disconnected triples

Abstract: The coupled‐cluster singles and doubles model (CCSD) is derived algebraically, presenting the full set of equations for a general reference function explicitly in spin–orbital form. The computational implementation of the CCSD model, which involves cubic and quartic terms, is discussed and results are reported and compared with full CI calculations for H2O and BeH2. We demonstrate that the CCSD exponential ansatz sums higher‐order correlation effects efficiently even for BeH2, near its transition state geometry where quasidegeneracy efforts are quite large, recovering 98% of the full CI correlation energy. For H2O, CCSD plus the fourth‐order triple excitation correction agrees with the full CI energy to 0.5 kcal/mol. Comparisons with low‐order models provide estimates of the effect of the higher‐order terms T1T2, T21T2, T31, and T41 on the correlation energy.

Quadratic configuration interaction. A general technique for determining electron correlation energies

Abstract: A general procedure is introduced for calculation of the electron correlation energy, starting from a single Hartree–Fock determinant. The normal equations of (linear) configuration interaction theory are modified by introducing new terms which are quadratic in the configuration coefficients and which ensure size consistency in the resulting total energy. When used in the truncated configuration space of single and double substitutions, the method, termed QCISD, leads to a tractable set of quadratic equations. The relation of this method to coupled‐cluster (CCSD) theory is discussed. A simplified method of adding corrections for triple substitutions is outlined, leading to a method termed QCISD(T). Both of these new procedures are tested (and compared with other procedures) by application to some small systems for which full configuration interaction results are available.

The equation of motion coupled‐cluster method. A systematic biorthogonal approach to molecular excitation energies, transition probabilities, and excited state properties

Abstract: A comprehensive overview of the equation of motion coupled‐cluster (EOM‐CC) method and its application to molecular systems is presented. By exploiting the biorthogonal nature of the theory, it is shown that excited state properties and transition strengths can be evaluated via a generalized expectation value approach that incorporates both the bra and ket state wave functions. Reduced density matrices defined by this procedure are given by closed form expressions. For the root of the EOM‐CC effective Hamiltonian that corresponds to the ground state, the resulting equations are equivalent to the usual expressions for normal single‐reference CC density matrices. Thus, the method described in this paper provides a universal definition of coupled‐cluster density matrices, providing a link between EOM‐CC and traditional ground state CC theory.Excitation energy,oscillator strength, and property calculations are illustrated by means of several numerical examples, including comparisons with full configuration interaction calculations and a detailed study of the ten lowest electronically excited states of the cyclic isomer of C4.

Coupled‐cluster methods with noniterative triple excitations for restricted open‐shell Hartree–Fock and other general single determinant reference functions. Energies and analytical gradients

Abstract: A new, noniterative triples correction to the coupled‐cluster singles and doubles (CCSD), method, for general single determinant reference functions is proposed and investigated numerically for various cases, including non‐Hartree–Fock (non‐HF) reference functions. It is correct through fourth‐order of perturbation theory for non‐HF references, and unlike other such methods, retains the usual invariance properties common to CC methods, while requiring only a single N7 step. In the canonical Hartree–Fock case, the method is equivalent to the usual CCSD(T) method, but now permits the use of restricted open‐shell Hartree‐Fock (ROHF) and quasirestricted Hartree–Fock (QRHF) reference determinants, along with many others. Comparisons with full configuration interaction (FCI) results are presented for CH2, CH2+, CH3, NH2, and SiH2. The paper also reports the derivation and initial computational implementation of analytical gradients for the ROHF‐CCSD(T) method, which includes unrestricted Hartree–Fock (UHF) CCSD...