Gambit

About: Gambit is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 518 publications have been published within this topic receiving 6300 citations.

The Sicilian gambit. A new approach to the classification of antiarrhythmic drugs based on their actions on arrhythmogenic mechanisms

Abstract: The Queen's Gambit is an opening move in chess that provides a variety of aggressive options to the player electing it. This report represents a similar gambit (the Sicilian Gambit) on the part of a group of basic and clinical investigators who met in Taormina, Sicily to consider the classification of antiarrhythmic drugs. Paramount to their considerations were 1) dissatisfaction with the options offered by existing classification systems for inspiring and directing research, development, and therapy, 2) the disarray in the field of antiarrhythmic drug development and testing in this post-Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) era, and 3) the desire to provide an operational framework for consideration of antiarrhythmic drugs that will both encourage advancement and have the plasticity to grow as a result of the advances that occur. The multifaceted approach suggested is, like the title of the article, a gambit. It is an opening rather than a compendium and is intended to challenge thought and investigation rather than to resolve issues. The article incorporates first, a discussion of the shortcomings of the present system for drug classification; second, a review of the molecular targets on which drugs act (including channels and receptors); third, a consideration of the mechanisms responsible for arrhythmias, including the identification of "vulnerable parameter" that might be most accessible to drug effect; and finally, clinical considerations with respect to antiarrhythmic drugs. Information relating to the various levels of information is correlated across categories (i.e., clinical arrhythmias, cellular mechanisms, and molecular targets), and a "spread sheet" approach to antiarrhythmic action is presented that considers each drug as a unit, with similarities to and dissimilarities from other drugs being highlighted. A complete reference list for this work would require as many pages as the text itself. For this reason, referencing is selective and incomplete. It is designed, in fact, to provide sufficient background information to give the interested reader a starting frame of reference rather than to recognize the complete body of literature that is the basis for this article.

Optimal strategies for predator avoidance: the relative importance of speed and manoeuvrability.

Abstract: The relative importance of speed and manoeuvrability in predator-prey chases was assessed by investigating whether or not a pursuing predator could catch its prey in a simple turning gambit initiated by the prey animal. The turning radius and velocity of the prey were normalized by dividing them by those of the predator. With the use of numerical methods to solve implicit equations it was determined for what values of relative radii and velocity the prey could escape. When escape was possible the optimal time of initiation of the prey's turn and the minimum closure distance of the predator were computed. It was found initially by numerical and subsequently by analytic techniques that, in order for the prey to escape the predator in the turning gambit, its normalized velocity must be related to its normalized radius by the inequality: v>r 1 2 over the interval 0 ⩽ r ⩽ 1. Situations in which the results of the turning gambit may be expected to give realistic predictions of capture or escape are discussed together with physical factors governing the relationship between turning radius and velocity, and the conditions under which the prey might profitably trade higher velocity for a smaller turning radius. Lastly, a number of specific predator-prey combinations are treated with a view towards illustrating the application of the theory and promoting the collection of simultaneous turning radii and velocity data.

The 'Sicilian Gambit' - A new approach to the classification of antiarrhythmic drugs based on their actions on arrhythmogenic mechanisms

Abstract: The Queen's Gambit is an opening move in chess that provides a variety of aggressive options to the player electing it. This report represents a similar gambit (the Sicilian Gambit) on the part of a group of basic and clinical investigators who met in Taormina, Sicily to consider the classification of antiarrhythmic drugs. Paramount to their considerations were 1) dissatisfaction with the options offered by existing classification systems for inspiring and directing research, development, and therapy, 2) the disarray in the field of antiarrhythmic drug development and testing in this post-Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) era, and 3) the desire to provide an operational framework for consideration of antiarrhythmic drugs that will both encourage advancement and have the plasticity to grow as a result of the advances that occur. The multifaceted approach suggested is, like the title of the article, a gambit. It is an opening rather than a compendium and is intended to challenge thought and investigation rather than to resolve issues. The article incorporates first, a discussion of the shortcomings of the present system for drug classification; second, a review of the molecular targets on which drugs act (including channels and receptors); third, a consideration of the mechanisms responsible for arrhythmias, including the identification of "vulnerable parameter" that might be most accessible to drug effect; and finally, clinical considerations with respect to antiarrhythmic drugs. Information relating to the various levels of information is correlated across categories (i.e., clinical arrhythmias, cellular mechanisms, and molecular targets), and a "spread sheet" approach to antiarrhythmic action is presented that considers each drug as a unit, with similarities to and dissimilarities from other drugs being highlighted. A complete reference list for this work would require as many pages as the text itself. For this reason, referencing is selective and incomplete. It is designed, in fact, to provide sufficient background information to give the interested reader a starting frame of reference rather than to recognize the complete body of literature that is the basis for this article.